mtarnovan

9 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by mtarnovan 7y ago

   It's just that when you say "performance on par with Go", people might imagine you could write a 3D engine in Elixir, which obviously isn't the case.
2. 32.▲
   by mtarnovan 7y ago

   For CPU intensive tasks, performance _is_ close to Ruby, while both Ruby and Elixir are far behind Go. Soft realtime doesn't mean fast, it just means good std deviation on response time and not a lot of missed deadlines. Fortunately as
3. 33.▲
   by mtarnovan 7y ago

   Correct me if i'm wrong but if you use something like Elixir's Stream you get composability for free and don't need transducers.
4. 34.▲
   by mtarnovan 7y ago

   I don't know why parent was downvoted. This is on top of the list of things that kept me from switching back to FF.
5. 35.▲
   by mtarnovan 7y ago

   I remember that thread now. Well, looks like standard Google behavior then.
6. 36.▲
   by mtarnovan 7y ago

   Looks like capitalism has blunted Hanlon's razor :-)
7. 37.▲
   by mtarnovan 7y ago

   Would they? Cause that would obviously give away that the break was intentional. If they break it for everyone they can still just blame it on an unintentional mistake.
8. 38.▲
   by mtarnovan 7y ago

   <tinfoil> What if it's not a bug, but Google testing user response </tinfoil> (assuming Google is not stupid so Hanlon's razor may not apply)
9. 39.▲
   by mtarnovan 7y ago

   Is shopify on google cloud? i noticed they are having issues too
10. 40.▲
    by mtarnovan 7y ago

    Ruby _is_ itself slow by any meaningful metric. That being said, the productivity gains usually outweigh the slowness. I've been doing Elixir/Phoenix lately and subjectively it feels significantly faster than Ruby/Rails.
11. 41.▲
    by mtarnovan 7y ago

    Lard is still very popular here in Romania. It's used extensively for cooking and frying. It's also consumed as a bread spread (salted and topped with onions, paprika etc). Meat and sausages stored in lard are also a delicacy. The
12. 42.▲
    HTTP 451 Unavailable for Legal Reasons(en.wikipedia.org)

    18 points by mtarnovan 8y ago|2 comments
13. 43.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    Examples? I read parts of the GDPR, especially those covering exceptions and everything I read seemed reasonable.
14. 44.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    Both of: * The pricing page includes a public IP for all instance types * It's an old plan they don't offer anymore So the cheapest one at the moment is START1-XS, which is 1EUR/month without public IP.
15. 45.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    Oh the irony. I click the link and a popup asks me to accept a bazillion cookies.
16. 46.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    I used both Hetzner and Scaleway. I trust Hetzner way more tbh. With Scaleway we had several issues other commenters also mentioned: instances not rebooting, random freezes, instance types out of stock. In the meantime we have both bare met
17. 47.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    Their cheapest instance is actually just 0.5EUR/month if you don't need a public IP.
18. 48.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    You should not ask: "When to use Microservices?" if your previous question was: "What is the difference between microservices and containers?"
19. 49.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    Sure. I just wanted to point out that the linked article describes similar weaponry used by the US in Vietnam, so the point about inspiration from a movie is kinda moot.
20. 50.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    "During the Vietnam War, the US used what it called "Lazy Dog" bombs. " Sure, they got the idea from the GI Joe movies /s
21. 51.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    I'm not sure what you mean.
22. 52.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    Not a fan of PHP, but people argued convincingly that server costs are very low compared to developers.
23. 53.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    I get a 403. Weird.
24. 54.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    I just found out that the Archer C7 now has support for both Qualcomm SFE and hardware decryption. No official builds yet (all official builds for the C7 are based on kernel 4.9 while SFE requires 4.14), but I found this: https:/&#x2
25. 55.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    Thanks, I tried this build: https://github.com/gwlim/openwrt-sfe-flowoffload and speeds are much improved (more than 2x, I'm getting 893.1Mbps downloads now).
26. 56.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    I should have been clearer. I was talking about two distinct issues: * lack of hardware encryption support * poor network performance (about 50% slower than with original firmware) - the issue I linked to
27. 57.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    Hardware encryption is on the C7 is not supported. If you have fast internet you're capped at 500mbps due to this issue: https://forum.archive.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=53703
28. 58.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    Anyone know a decently priced router with 802.11ac and hardware encryption that can run OpenWRT? I currently have an TP-LINK Archer C7 with OpenWRT but VPN performance is abysmal. I don't know if my router has any hardware decryption (
29. 59.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    I have a C7 with OpenWrt, but: If your internet is fast, OpenWrt is not good on the TP-Link C7, see this issue: https://forum.archive.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=53703 . I downgraded my internet from 1gbps to 500mbps becaus
30. 60.▲
    by mtarnovan 8y ago

    Last I checked SES had quite poor deliverability, at least compared to MC, sendgrid &co. Has that improved?