mst

50 ms·

721.
by mst 3y ago
Then it may be worth asking yourselves "how do we get this fact publicised more widely?" since I don't recall reading about Rocky's contributions either. (I'm not a heavy user of RHish distros, mind, I only ever ant
722.
by mst 3y ago
The entire situation smells like an iterated prisoner's dilemma that's going to end up locked in an eternal defect/defect cycle with assorted odd and unintended collateral damage on the margins. Hopefully in your case - given
723.
by mst 3y ago
A neophyte wants to make a thing that -does- something, but part of the idea of Racket's Language Oriented Programming thing is to increase the subset of somethings for which throwing together a quick DSL makes for easier/nicer co
724.
by mst 3y ago
> What do I need to monitor? I think it's worth looking at those decisions as wanting to be made both top-down -and- bottom-up. Top-down as in "start from what makes the business a viable business and then analyze downwards fro
725.
by mst 3y ago
> every ORM seems to resist having a table with no primary key perl's DBIx::Class doesn't honestly give a shit. I understand there are many perfectly understandable reasons why people dislike perl itself, but it's really a
726.
by mst 3y ago
Thank you.
727.
by mst 3y ago
"TF cards" ? Either I don't know the term or I'm undercaffeinated and my memory hasn't booted properly yet, either way please take pity on me and explain?
728.
by mst 3y ago
53 bit integers should be enough for anyone (in practice for config it usually is but enforcing it is horribly patchy)
729.
by mst 3y ago
if it's a fresh field, I think I might turn out to prefer them always initialised the same way for the sake of my muscle memory. Now, that may not be true of -me- in practice, but it's definitely possible for whoever did implement
730.
by mst 3y ago
There's a class of fanboys who will be telling you about that because they're Really Excited that they got it Just How They Wanted It. Most of us think "we like it, some people don't, great if it's an option, probab
731.
by mst 3y ago
In fact, it got to the point where I realised I was only ever hitting the arrow keys by accident while in insert mode so my vimrc now contains: inoremap <Left> <NOP> inoremap <Right> <NOP> inoremap &lt
732.
by mst 3y ago
The other approach I've seen is having some sort of weird key combination (like "hitting both shift keys at once") to switch back and forth between two layouts. I saw somebody using it for QWERTY vs. DVORAK but it seems like
733.
by mst 3y ago
I use heirloom vi (while making it clear when asked that I doubt the person asking me should do the same ;) I was basically forced into learning vi to begin with (editing things on a -very- heterogenous collection of servers) but then found
734.
by mst 3y ago
Does that mean that one could trap Ctrl+AltGr+8 and map it to the same effect? (and the same for 7/9/0 if required) If so, I'll try and remember that if ever tempted to use Ctrl and {[]} together I need to handle that as well
735.
by mst 3y ago
If I conceptualise it as "your device unlock code is now also your master password but instead of randomly generated passwords we're using a key system actually designed for what we're doing with it" it makes a lot of se
736.
by mst 3y ago
Poasted with no ragrets.
737.
by mst 3y ago
It's still on my "I keep meaning to play with this" list because I keep getting distracted by other shiny things but you might find gomacro interesting.
738.
by mst 3y ago
The goals of Taxi feel at least somewhat like 'creating a domain driven design style Ubiquitous Language to describe data and relationships' and the deliberate not-forcing-a-single-global-thing seems like it'll at least make
739.
by mst 3y ago
And then of course you have to pick between lodash and ramda (I'd say "whichever your dependencies use" but every time I've tried to use that as a deciding factor the answer has turned out to be "both"). It&#x2
740.
by mst 3y ago
It would be unsurprising to discover that M. Yglesias attracted the attention of a twitter cluster that holds a fairly specific niche view very strongly and lots of that cluster piled in to the thread in question. This is not, after all, a
741.
by mst 3y ago
Hence the existence of "confidence and supply" agreements where a party agrees to a loose coalition whose only pledge is to support the main party therein by voting for budgets (supply) and against no-confidence motions.
742.
by mst 3y ago
I've seen enough examples go past to think that single subject rules tend to be honoured in the letter but not the spirit, but equally if a frankenbill can pass without a single legislator invoking that rule, then it's entirely po
743.
by mst 3y ago
If you find the code wants factoring out (if you don't, just leave it be, parsers are wonderful things to have written but IME writing them is generally a labour of love) then that split tends to be very natural and works well in the v
744.
by mst 3y ago
-facepalm- Thank you.
745.
by mst 3y ago
I completely messed up one of the examples, sorry. I meant the 'this' thing - a sibling comment to yours contains the correct code.
746.
by mst 3y ago
I tend to call ARM a load/store architecture to emphasise that difference and it seems to get my point across without derailing the conversation into a RISC-or-not debate. (Note that I'm endorsing this as working in human to human
747.
by mst 3y ago
It continues to sadden me that the implicit this injection happens only on direct invocation - let res = obj.method(arg); and let m = obj.method; let res = obj.method(arg); being different things seems like an unfortun
748.
by mst 3y ago
That feels like an argument for 'final' more than 'private.' Personally, at least for library code, I tend to assume -somebody- will extend any given class of mine at -some- point and would prefer they had a reasonable t
749.
by mst 3y ago
https://archive.ph/ffvTF
750.
by mst 3y ago
Database appears to have gone poof but somebody archived it beforehand: https://archive.ph/ffvTF

More ›