msane

10 ms·

61.
by msane 10y ago
If that's the case you shouldn't misrepresent why you don't have fluoride
62.
by msane 10y ago
Speaking of vulnerabilities and intrusion, pdf is a can of worms. I wish there were less pdf links...
63.
by msane 10y ago
I think this is our future, whether it's dystopian or not. Technology is eventually going to make it impossible to really prevent "Persistent aerial surveillance". What requires an expensive small blimp today might become the
64.
by msane 10y ago
idea of expressing your UI as a pure function of the form f(data) = view and being able to compose those functions together. This is a verbose re-statement of components, which are not new. Before React, you couldn't do this in a pe
65.
by msane 10y ago
The big story is the idea of expressing your UI as a pure function of the form f(data) = view and being able to compose those functions together. Before React, you couldn't do this in a performant, UX-positive way Well that is just e
66.
by msane 10y ago
The script style is intentional. They may be discovered / heard / stuck. It minimizes attribution. Even still, "poorly written" is mostly big talk.
67.
by msane 10y ago
He probably doesn't appreciate you letting us know what he said.
68.
by msane 10y ago
Attribution security is the meta-message. Perhaps that's the best attribution. It could be someone else taking advantage of the timing but that is definitely the intended frame. "Better than stuxnet" is also quite the claim.
69.
by msane 10y ago
There are a lot of little gems in the wording of the auction message. ( http://pastebin.com/raw/JBcipKBL ) If it is Russia there will be some content that only the US gov will understand. I wonder which portions those wo
70.
by msane 10y ago
Be careful what you say.
71.
by msane 10y ago
There are a few phrases which suggest perfectly fluent english, such as "can do with files as they please" . If anything stands out from the writing to me it's that it sounds like a scam.
72.
by msane 10y ago
In a world where all drugs are legal, do you think there should still be prescription medications?
73.
by msane 10y ago
The phrase is still less than persuasive.
74.
by msane 10y ago
That seems like a comment for reddit.
75.
by msane 10y ago
I don't know, the first 5 paragraphs were about his lunch.
76.
by msane 10y ago
The intent is keeping the entire platform free from malware and junk. Your app may be malware free, but it's pretty obvious there are many others which would not be.
77.
by msane 10y ago
But would they still have a safe platform?
78.
by msane 10y ago
:: breaks the url for clients / is not supported in the URL specs. Use the fragment or query.
79.
by msane 10y ago
People wouldn't sideload malware?
80.
by msane 10y ago
It's the cleanest mass market app store in existence. Highest quality apps, least malware.
81.
by msane 10y ago
Nobody is knocking Debian. Ubuntu picked Debian, for apt-get and stability, after all. But apt-get has undergone many improvements because of the swell in Ubuntu users. And that user-base has brought more documentation and energy to linux t
82.
by msane 10y ago
It doesn't tell the story of the company, how it runs, the disruption in its industry? Was it not true to the headline?
83.
by msane 10y ago
Thats odd because it looks like you understand the article. I didnt have any trouble understanding the thesises which were called out in the introductory paragraph either.
84.
by msane 10y ago
Credit theft. People can acquire a credit card by mail or online. That's interesting... in Spain does getting credit require an in-person appointment? Because maybe that's a simple answer to 2/3 of the identity theft in the
85.
by msane 10y ago
Is that really an argument? that you don't need to write it at the beginning ? you still have to do it...
86.
by msane 10y ago
What exactly do you not need? What does "single page app" mean to you? The term is not a description of the amount of features.
87.
by msane 10y ago
It takes more time and energy than the team realizes, which would otherwise be spent building the app. Its the frontend after all... what matters is UI and features. Component communication patterns and all this low level stuff is time lost
88.
by msane 10y ago
...the benefit of React is that you can choose an architecture... I don't see that as a benefit... you must choose, and hope you chose well, based on poorer information and docs. It's an expense and a risk. Some are more confide
89.
by msane 10y ago
One thing I prefer about Angular is all of these patterns are established and documented by the same people who designed the framework. In React they are distributed among hundreds of blogs and individual github repos, which all debate each
90.
by msane 10y ago
I don't mind DI, in Angular or elsewhere. I'm not sure in what way you think of it as a DSL, or even that it requires tooling. It's a useful pattern in OOP.

More ›