ms123

9 ms·

61.
by ms123 15y ago
Perfect. What is there more to say, really? You made the world a little better today.
62.
by ms123 15y ago
Thanks for pointing out the article
63.
IDEs Are Dangerous(sokolmichael.com)
11 points by ms123 15y ago|12 comments
64.
by ms123 15y ago
Your point is valid. My stand is that recursion forces the programmer to think about the edge cases first, which would make a bug less likely to appear.
65.
Things I learned from functional programming(sokolmichael.heroku.com)
5 points by ms123 15y ago|3 comments
66.
by ms123 15y ago
Thanks for the award. Yup, there's only one implementation. But doesn't in change? What will the compiled code be like in 3 years from now? The compiled code's prupose is to be optimised, not consistent. This is my point. By restricting you
67.
by ms123 15y ago
Am I the only one to completely disagree with the author? It's important not to mix everything. CoffeeScript is a language . There just happen to have an implementation for it. This invalidates the "debug" workflow problem. Let me restat
68.
The Evil League to support 'Community'(evilleague.heroku.com)
1 points by ms123 15y ago|0 comments
69.
by ms123 15y ago
It's worth mentioning 'css3buttons' project which does the same thing in a really elegent way. https://github.com/michenriksen/css3buttons
70.
by ms123 15y ago
Fun, little, and mind-rewarding. That's just how hacks should be. I found what I'll be doing this afternoon.
71.
by ms123 15y ago
Interesting experiment. It goes to show the importance of wording and conciseness in titles.
72.
by ms123 15y ago
my point is that programs can be pipelined, not applications.
73.
by ms123 15y ago
To me the difference between "old-web" and "new-web" is a lot like the one between "program" and "application. Old-web was just text and markup. A lot like the output of command line programs that could then be used by other programs to per