Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mrsssnake
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
mrsssnake
8mo ago
Not anonymous even for small amounts of money. Without tricks and workarounds Blik apps requires Google/Apple approved smartphone with Google/Apple approved build of the OS logged into Google/Apple account. Participation in t
62.
▲
by
mrsssnake
8mo ago
Seeing bad looking slop generated image -> Expecting badly written slop generated text
63.
▲
by
mrsssnake
8mo ago
No, it does not have any more access than any other app, as it work on unrooted devices too. That said, it has to be compiled for older Android SDK level because newer levels prevent apps to run executables they downloaded on their own and
64.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
I could talk about things better in Linux whole day. But besides popularity (so being preinstalled, proprietary software availability, being presented from childhood) is there a single reason to use Windows? Backwards compatibility, accessi
65.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
Example of evil maid attack. On laptops prevented automatically by secure boot or manually by encryption and checking fingerprints, not by bricking whole device.
66.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
If this would be the reason, downgrading would wipe the device not brick it permanently.
67.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
> they have no way to stop an attacker from loading up the broken firmware to exploit your device You mean the attacker having a physical access to the device plugging in some USB or UART, or the hacker that downgraded the firmware so it
68.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
Would switch to PostmarketOS tomorrow if there was any fully supported hardware (camera, 4G calling, etc.). All programs/apps I use are FOSS and standardized anyway.
69.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
Libre software should be used regardless. And the switching cost with it is still not low but drastically lower.
70.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
Carriers dropping legacy IP network and providing only direct connection to few popular CDNs would be natural next step for this security strategy.
71.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
> handling mobile devices' changing IP addresses as it hops from one subnet to another We could create TCP/UDP alternative that would handle mobile IP addresses or even make traffic take multiple of those paths at once (look up
72.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
How is nearly 50% of modern Internet infrastructure not well tested enough? Also, IPv6 is not an implementation by itself. > Network routing means there are dozens of TCPIP implementations touching traffic. One reason why routers should
73.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
> And please stop with that 'computers security', we all know here it does not exist (NAT or not), it is a fantasy. Saying otherwise is engaging in bad faith. So you are willing to message me your credentials then?
74.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
Also with IPv6 with NAT you definitely have this security, but with IPv4 without NAT you MIGHT have that security... Disabling security features makes them disabled. Also security of NAT is a side effect because of that the devices behind i
75.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
ISP hosting a virtual machine you remote desktop into from internal network as the only way to access the external internet can also work as a "de facto firewall". But the best de facto firewall is a proper firewall.
76.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
France with >85% IPv6 adoption mostly made of grandmothers driving a motorcycles across the town manually delivering packets like in their youth.
77.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
Disabled protection does not protect. This is UI/UX thing, not something in Internet-scale protocols. I can "curl https://somethingshady | bash -" but won't blame RFC1738.
78.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
With NAT turned on nana's computer is still protected by the same Arris gateway.
79.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
Not really, look at a great post on Tailscale blog how such P2P connection can be established: https://tailscale.com/blog/how-nat-traversal-works With IPv6 you might have to use a hack to make firewall allow incoming p
80.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
Discussions about NAT very often forget that it works by messing up with the transport layer. The fuzz is about hiding IP address and exposing services, but the worst thing about NAT is that technically it should not count as a connection t
81.
▲
by
mrsssnake
9mo ago
What's up with those comments? Am I still on HackerNews or did I visit Reddit with some HackerNews theme applied? Internet engineers pre-2000 had some idealistic, heavly mathematically proven ideas that still seem revolutionary today.
82.
▲
by
mrsssnake
10mo ago
Should really be called Restricted Boot
83.
▲
by
mrsssnake
10mo ago
- Russian Yandex.ru trackers on their website - proprietary app - no Linux version Looks like houndreds of others shitty chat apps, why even post it?
84.
▲
by
mrsssnake
11mo ago
Why not take it a step further and get cryptographically proven handle? Instead of relying on global top-to-bottom DNS system?
85.
▲
by
mrsssnake
11mo ago
There absolutely are annoyences IPv6 get rid of, that are much embedded in IT culture we only see them if we look. Port forwarding, external/internal address split, split horizon DNS, SNI proxies, NAT, hairpin routing - some of the hac
86.
▲
by
mrsssnake
11mo ago
> For those unfamiliar, a NAT Gateway acts as a one way door to your private subnet to access the internet without allowing traffic in Repeat after me: NAT is not a firewall. And we need to stop pretending it is.
87.
▲
by
mrsssnake
11mo ago
Unless you are going to self-host, you would be required to provide government ID for registration on a server.
88.
▲
by
mrsssnake
11mo ago
Nextcloud is AGPL, that ensures when using an external hosting provider you still has the freedoms, access to source code (their modifications) and the setup is portable. It can be very buggy and slow, especially the addon apps, but after y
89.
▲
by
mrsssnake
1y ago
The mere fact such phone exist could be enough argument for pushing back, for ex. hurtful legislations. People tend to see current world as carved in stone, like it is not going to change. It is, still not easy but, much easier to ask gover
90.
▲
by
mrsssnake
1y ago
> Most consumers DON'T CARE Why is this argument even a thing? They want to use Facebook, Instagram, TikTok... The exact services that wouldn't exist in the first place if there wasn't for the open neutral Internet, someth
More ›