mrsmrtss

8 ms·

121.
by mrsmrtss 1y ago
That's partially attributed to the fact that .NET is a truly batteries included solution and quality of it is generally good enough that there is no need for second or third alternatives for every basic thing.
122.
by mrsmrtss 1y ago
I have developed .NET solutions on Linux over 8 years now (and about 10 years on Windows before) and would say the quality of development in Linux is even better than in Windows today. Sure you can't use Visual Studio in Linux, but you
123.
by mrsmrtss 1y ago
Why C# makes it worse?
124.
by mrsmrtss 1y ago
In your c# sample full namespaces are unnecessary and will add only noise in this context.
125.
by mrsmrtss 1y ago
If we look at .NET vs Java, then yes, Microsoft is better. Microsoft may charge for some of its dev tools (Visual Studio etc), but .NET itself is and was always totally free.
126.
by mrsmrtss 1y ago
And yet, Java is trying desperately to fix its generics now with project Valhalla (although value types are their main goal), but it's almost impossible to do without major breaking changes. Without reified generics there's major
127.
by mrsmrtss 1y ago
"Proper" generics, value types, LINQ, operator overloading, excellent native interop etc make a big enough difference to me atleast to prefer c# over java. Is being "Microsofty" a bad thing and "Oracly" or &quo
128.
by mrsmrtss 1y ago
It may also be related to the fact that .NET until now does not have any GC with super low latency pauses, but there are interesting development going on recently regarding this - https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/
129.
by mrsmrtss 1y ago
It's more likely they never tried C#, but have a very strong negative bias towards it nevertheless. C# can also be written very functional if you want, it's a multi-paradigm language like Typescript itself.
130.
by mrsmrtss 1y ago
Sorry, but there is absolutely nothing you gain with Node.js here in server side at least, it's clearly inferior choice for this job. You loose performance, type safety and in about two weeks there are hundreds of security issues foun
131.
by mrsmrtss 1y ago
And you are not using Typescript either, because it's a Microsoft language? Also .NET is open source over a decade already and c# was free and open from the beginning (Mono implementation).
132.
by mrsmrtss 1y ago
If you want to build a SPA, you would choose Vue, React, Angular or any other currently popular JS framework for front-end anyway. However, for a traditional web application, what's wrong with using ASP.NET Razor? Also, for desktop de
133.
by mrsmrtss 1y ago
That includes also all the "batteries" ( https://github.com/dotnet ).
134.
by mrsmrtss 1y ago
> I personally would get panic attacks and couldn't sleep anymore if my dependencies aren't open source and I would depend on a company for any reason. But that's just me, it definitely sounds very mature .NET is open sour