Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mro_name
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
46 ms
·
511.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
phones? how lame.
512.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
yes, I do think that
513.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
think of the metric/imperial example above. The distance isn't just a number. Holds for most other things, too. Typed is key. Be it either static or dynamic.
514.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
I apologise for the misleading example "leap year".
515.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
in real life nobody will guarantee you anything. But treating dates and surnames alike doesn't help robustness either. Or separate types for metric distance and imperial distance might have prevented mars(?) lander losses. Or for sea l
516.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
maybe you get the sunshine case out of the door quicker. But beware new-year or leap years. Or daylight saving change. Or non-ascii. I mean, who would ever care about fringe cases when you can have continuous delivery instead?
517.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
paying whatsapp doesn't pay for the signal service.
518.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
lol, that sadly doesn't count then.
519.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
how much do you spend on the service that's so crucial to you? What do you expect to get when giving nothing? Whoever is keeping a Whatsapp Account nowadays shits on the privacy of all their addressbook contacts and can't be helpe
520.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
I think that works extremely well – taken action is relevant while intentions are much less so aren't they? And building a "coalition" isn't a natural law nor even how things were intended – the house is named "parl
521.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
so do(n't) I.
522.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
with the "Decline!" double meaning (refuse! vs. list the grammatical cases of the noun!)
523.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
… and were faster (in visiting their consultant).
524.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
sounds like Clausewitz.
525.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
sounds a lot more like blockchain.
526.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
nothing wrong. Searching unmodified html though is sometimes preferable.
527.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
it's statically linkable rust, isn't it? Awesome. I'm looking for a successor to $ xmllint --html --xpath … that doesn't choke on inline svg.
528.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
> Everyone assumes you can’t code your way out of a paper bag if you haven’t worked with their exact stack for one year longer than it has existed, even though it’s all incredibly easy to learn. Indeed, I see this a lot – complaining abo
529.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
while I don't buy the article on typography, the surrounding site was interesting, thanks for sharing!
530.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
The square hole is hilarious.
531.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
this is a remarkably well designed website, thanks for sharing.
532.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
...and what simplicity won't buy you, nothing else will.
533.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
I doubt that humans, being the herd animals that they are, use anything other than mere perceptibility (= volume and repetition possibly weighted with the status of the speaker) to reach consensus. As usual, 10% of the population are not qu
534.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
Kinda near-range walkie, nice. Bluetooth transmission should do, shouldn't it?
535.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
another google honeypot. So ironic. haha.
536.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
> This prevents AT&T, Sun or SCO from taking the GNU code, claiming it as their own, and suing the linux crowd for infringement. you see, no matter how trivial the matter, the lawyers manage to have their share.
537.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
so what?
538.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
I guess consumerism is at the heart of the problem. And juicy complexity successfully keeps consumers remaining such. I think humans - having been nomads for the most part of their existence – just aren't equipped to care for their hab
539.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com comes quite close IMO. And: make it long-term-proof, so you can leave things as they are for decades.
540.
▲
by
mro_name
5y ago
Full ACK esp. for the part about promotion. David Pogue delivered a nice TED Talk 2006 [1], when he's enthusiastic about a new version of a program that didn't change a thing but just made it more robust. [1] https://ww
More ›