mro_name

31 ms·

361.
by mro_name 5y ago
and so did facebook (=> remember friendfeed).
362.
by mro_name 5y ago
I bet it scared the shit out of Zuck and still does today. Add websub and few more and you have a social network, duh. Decentral. People owned.
363.
by mro_name 5y ago
atom, actually.
364.
by mro_name 5y ago
I like those unorthodox, against-cargo-cult approaches. Thx!
365.
by mro_name 5y ago
they've got emojiquette!
366.
by mro_name 5y ago
do as you please, but none of my family could responsibly maintain a dedicated server.
367.
by mro_name 5y ago
but hopefully leaving people not as clueless. But to not learn a thing seems to be part of the long-term promise. While short term they have to be devs. I would like that the way round. Start with laypersons to begin with. That may not look
368.
by mro_name 5y ago
if it just were without dependency hell but intended for long-term.
369.
by mro_name 5y ago
I can't imagine that the process level is an issue here – we're not talking military, do we? Other than that, prefer zero-knowledge designs and you can often reduce to the danger of vandalism. Have a friendly hoster and/or ba
370.
by mro_name 5y ago
while operating the server is the full thing, shared hosting is sensibly doable for most if not all people taking part in the internet. It's cumbersome application stacks that make hosting a part time job and scare the hell out of layp
371.
by mro_name 5y ago
The internet you have in mind is from corporations for corporations. Humans are the livestock. And as the corpos are huge, Conway predicts so will be the webpages. (=> 'Website obesity crisis' https://idlewords.com&#
372.
by mro_name 5y ago
I use a personal static microblog engine, miss it for the public and am about improving it.
373.
by mro_name 5y ago
it could also be a paper exercise book, couldn't it?
374.
by mro_name 5y ago
> a company with so much resources That is the problem: resources show up in abundance, not in scarcity. Only small or poor creators usually can do the latter. Conways law at work, I guess.
375.
by mro_name 5y ago
Website obesity crisis progressing. http://idlewords.com/talks/website_obesity.htm A webform requiring truckloads of stuff and gear.
376.
German government invites consultation on a right to fast internet at 10MBit/s(bundesnetzagentur.de)
1 points by mro_name 5y ago|1 comments
377.
by mro_name 5y ago
serious comments in german language welcome to ravt-konsultation@bnetza.de
378.
by mro_name 5y ago
comes with a bit of irony that you need 2 more cloud providers to actually get more than a white page. Has a neat offline appeal though. But offline and wilderness strongly resonate with me. Even more so, when it comes to children. It'
379.
by mro_name 5y ago
The Romans had no arabic numerals and no arithmetic - that's why the statics of the buildings were not calculated. So some were over- and others under-dimensioned. You only see the over-dimensioned ones. They are still standing today.
380.
by mro_name 5y ago
XML and YAML (including it's JSON representation) are complexity nightmares. But especially for xml, the tooling makes them appealing to use as e.g. distribution format with JS-less browser templating.
381.
by mro_name 5y ago
S-expressions, finally! Thanks!
382.
by mro_name 5y ago
lol. Get rid of GA by installing GA. Quite my humour.
383.
by mro_name 5y ago
I would rather not have an dedicated extension for every encroaching participant on the internet. I prefer, to have one tool for the same task in various situations (GA, FB, you name it).
384.
by mro_name 5y ago
> infiltrated by enemy saboteurs. alas, many saboteurs may consider themselves friends.
385.
by mro_name 5y ago
wow, thanks for sharing. You may know the talk about the connection between origami and math: https://www.ted.com/talks/robert_lang_folds_way_new_origami
386.
by mro_name 5y ago
even less so should three letters take ages, shouldn't it? E = m c^2 Any 5-year old can write this.
387.
by mro_name 5y ago
Indeed. That's enforced system boundaries.
388.
by mro_name 5y ago
you're in responsibility land then. That's not where they buy IBM to avoid getting fired. You get paid not for being smart, but for just doing responsibility for standard engineering. Plain craft. And do it seriously, not for admi
389.
by mro_name 5y ago
but? It think it's far deeper than mitigation, it's the solution. Edit: I apologize for getting 'sanitation' wrong. Don't do it.
390.
by mro_name 5y ago
it's all about system boundaries. Would you have arbitrary racoons in your closet?

More ›