mrlala

44 ms·

1. 421.▲
   by mrlala 9y ago

   >and probably bad for you. But they have a $5bn company and I don’t. That is far more value creation than simple armchair criticism. Not necessarily. It's not value creation when you are creating a bubble and letting people do thin
2. 422.▲
   by mrlala 9y ago

   >And also from selling the trading data to high frequency traders to front-run the Robinhood traders. Where's your source on this because that is blatantly illegal- so I don't believe you.
3. 423.▲
   by mrlala 9y ago

   >but it’s not a good habit Being able to get things done is a good habit. There's of course a balance somewhere in the middle, but doing 50 projects in 50 days and having to work quick and write code that "works" is certai
4. 424.▲
   by mrlala 9y ago

   Like the sumo wrestler phenomenon from Freakanomics.. something like the top 10 are extremely well off where after that it's crap salary.
5. 425.▲
   by mrlala 9y ago

   There's an instrument to "track" future volatility in the market. There's also an instrument that does the opposite of this volatility. If the volatility moves from 15 -> 30, it goes up 100%. What happens if you are
6. 426.▲
   by mrlala 9y ago

   No that's not true. Leverage and "money that never existed" are not one in the same. For example, if you buy a futures contract with a value of $1000 but it only requires a 10% margin ($100) to buy the contract.. you are lev