Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mrlala
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
41 ms
·
361.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
> I have a right to travel and a right to privacy. Saying that I can only use one of these rights at a time is absurd. You are so fixated on the car in this mindeset. Do you have the right to fly an airplane and have privacy at the same
362.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
Do they potentially propagate through matter with less interference than electromagnetic waves? I have no idea, that would be the only thought.. otherwise yeah I don't see what the appeal would be.. and how the hell do you create them
363.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
Why shouldn't law enforcement be able to use it? I mean.. wouldn't it be great to know if people are driving without valid registrations? Or if a criminal is trying to get somewhere, and you have their plates? Not sure I see a dow
364.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
>privacy implications I think you voluntarily giving up a certain amount of privacy when you choose to drive on the road. Sure yes you can argue most places you don't really have a choice since you need a car. But then I could arg
365.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
>But streaming services are also heavily underutilized ? >Even 5-6 people, I doubt my Netflix account is used for more than 10-15 hours a week in total. Err, you seem to be under the impression that 2 hours/person/week is th
366.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
>The problem would be the friction of deciding what I reward and what I don't. I don't want to make 200 decisions like that every month in my day to day browsing. Yeah that is exactly the problem. It would be like having an al
367.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
If this is indeed the case then I mostly agree it sounds like he's arguing why it's called assault. For example, people will call it "rape" when it's someone underage no matter the circumstance. Having willful sex
368.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
I'm not going to pay for every stupid little thing I do on the internet. And I'm sure there have been attempts at stuff like this, but who really wants this? I can see it now.. every link I click on here or reddit I have to pay $
369.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
Agreed. Part of a two person team, but the other is mainly on the business development front and I'm the main designer/coder. It's so hard sometimes. No one to really bounce ideas off of, every little thing you have to do y
370.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
I know you are being facetious, but 'All in the Family' is still extremely relevant. And honestly what a show. They tackled a LOT of serious issues. I think today's trump republicans should turn it on every once and a whil
371.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
Then come home. I'm not really on his side here. If he thinks what he did was so morally correct then he should have stayed.
372.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
>If everyone has a degree, it offers no advantage. No advantage? Everyone would have a much broader education including a specialty. Even if they don't directly use that specialty it in their future career, it's still useful.
373.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
>The US public does not want this Yes, they do.
374.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
Maybe a start would be having universal healthcare so we don't have to worry so much about someone having a full-time job. I have to imagine a large part of this argument is rideshare drivers just want some healthcare without it cost
375.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
>a@xxxxx.com For when XXX is just not kinky enough for you.
376.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
Greed. Most upper middle class / rich people don't want to increase their tax burden 2-4% for something they already have. Also ignorance. A lot of people in that realm don't even understand the burden healthcare is on most
377.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
Completely agree. I've been using Dapper for a few years now and it's amazing because I have control over everything. I created a simple overlay, which also allows me to do some very specific things that you just cannot do with
378.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
Because when it's legal that destroys a lot of the market for illegal sellers.. so there are less illegal sellers around.
379.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
Are the engineers you are referring to in developing brain stages? You are replying to OP who said from 16-18.. that is still fairly prime development.. your bay area engineers are probably mid 20's? That is quite different when we ar
380.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
>would bother to wait in line for a physical voting booth ever again As someone living in a state with mail-in ballots, it still boggles my mind waiting in line for physical voting is a thing. Mail-in ballots seem to be the best of all
381.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
>how can we know if it was luck or skill? Easy, it's luck.
382.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
>Why do you need studies to give you permission to do something? No one said that. >Particularly when science is facing a crisis of reproducibility, I would not put so much emphasis on them Err.. science is facing a crisis of reproduc
383.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
The counter argument would be- just because you enjoy knitting 30 minutes a day and it relaxes you, does that mean it will work the same for anyone/everyone else? If there was a study that empirically proved knitting for 30 days made y
384.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
Not that I'm educated at all on the topic but just a guess... all the really really really dry shit burned last year? So there's less crazy at-risk parts to burn? California was at drought level for years if I remember correctly,
385.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
But I'm using a linear regression, isn't that AI!?
386.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
Hey the morons in /r/The_Donald can say what they want. That is what we have all determined. However, one of the largest social media sites out there (reddit) does NOT have to allow them to congregate together. Reddit should h
387.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
The theoretical argument is simple- if you ban one kind of speech, where does it end? The line can keep getting moved closer until what's not allowed is in a gray area and that's not where we want to be. However, the practical si
388.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
>It’s just semantics No it's not... I was responding to someone who said there is no "normal". Yeah, there is. Most people behave in a way you would expect. Most people exhibit motor controls the way you would expect. A
389.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
>You've made my point. It may not incur a personal cost at the time of use, but it incurs a cost regardless. You really think that made your point? Wow you are really really really trying to never let anyone use the word free aren&#
390.
▲
by
mrlala
7y ago
>there is no normal I mean, yeah there is? There are 7 billion people on this planet. If you could create some score of peoples intelligence, how they react/respond to people, their normal physical movements and put that into a dist
More ›