Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mrkramer
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
59 ms
·
751.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
This blog post[0] explains how to bypass hardcoded DNS servers with PiHole. It might help those who don't know how to do it. Didn't test it personally, I still use uBlock Origin. [0] https://labzilla.io/blog/f
752.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
They were speaking about Log In session cookies that is what I was referring to. I don't know what legal status of session cookies is but they are required in order for a website to track if you are logged in or not otherwise you would
753.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
>Using cookies to track state on a website, that is only used for that website, is fine. You don't need to ask for consent. That is how a site tracks things like whether you are logged in. They are called 1st party cookies and they
754.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
But Google is so huge that they are only satisfied if they serve hundreds of millions or billions of users. For example if you have SaaS company you would be very happy to serve hundreds or thousands of customers but if your business model
755.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
They will evolve step by step just like everything does.
756.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
Larry Page said he is worried because of Google was and is doing too many things. But they simply have to do it because their cash pile is so big that it can't just hang out in bank for decades.
757.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
>Search was full of low-hanging fruit. TF-IDF was well-known. PageRank less so but when the nascent internet has so much signal-to-noise it’s often hard to go wrong. PageRank actually originates from Economics[0] where Input–output model
758.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
Google always figures out how to scale products to millions and millions of users e.g. Search, Gmail, Google Maps, YouTube, Android. But I agree with you, they are not really innovating. I would say they are scaling software in order to mak
759.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
>Google invented something unique and innovative and they were rewarded tremendously for it. There were literally hundreds of other companies trying to do the same thing but Google was better. If it was low hanging fruit then Hotbot or a
760.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
>Try building a search engine today. The barriers to entry are much harder. Finding useful sites and filtering out spam are much more difficult now than when Google started. I'm not a programmer but I can write down on a piece of pa
761.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
When will Google Search close?
762.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
>For example, that the way to make truly big bucks is not to rob banks, but to manipulate the stock market. Ah so that's why GameStop Stonk meme happened :)
763.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
That's why I said >I'm not an expert in this matters but if you know any relevant studies claiming that nudity is not harmful for kids, please show them to me.
764.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
Idk I'm not an expert in this matters but people talk about exposing kids to anything including nudity is harmful to them. I really don't know but I think there is consensus that kids shouldn't be exposed to nudity.
765.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
GirlsDoPorn case is somewhat surprising to me because I think US regulators failed to prevent abuse of protentional and eventual victims of this porn company. The company was active from 2009 to 2020 and they only stopped their business whe
766.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
>There were memes, blogs, video content, music, etc. Aka user-generated content.
767.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
I assume you speak about East Europe and perhaps South America but most of them are lured into porn not forced.
768.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
>Growing up my father believed playing the GTA would be detrimental to my development. Almost all parents think that, COD included. But I think recent studies said that video game violence does not influence kids and teens to commit real
769.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
>Showing a naked boob is considered porn and banned on most of these platform Probably because a lot of kids use these platforms aka social networks.
770.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
They refused Facebook's acquisition offer but I think their endgame is getting acquired by Google. Facebook offered $3bn but Google will have to offer much more, at least x5 more.
771.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
Snapchat is still doing fine considering how much competition they have all over the place e.g. Instagram, TikTok, YouTube etc. TikTok won't be banned because US will force it to relocate all their relevant servers to US and hand in U
772.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
Moore's law is our friend and in the future seamless cloud gaming will be possible.
773.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
This is Google's modus operandi; if they can't dominate the particular market and gain monopol, they will simply shut it down. Why bother losing money or breaking even when you can go to some other niche and try to dominate it and
774.
▲
Google Search now queries Reddit and Quora in response to open-ended questions
(techcrunch.com)
11 points
by
mrkramer
4y ago
|
0 comments
775.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
I saw your comment only now but I wanted to say that I value free, reliable and somewhat satisfactory service that Amazon, Google and Facebook offer. They are not excellent but they get the job done. I'm aware that I'm trading my
776.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
News like this scare me because they make you realize you can't rely 100% on the technology. My Samsung phone is 2 years old and it didn't swell. I hope it won't but man it sucks that stuff like this happens. Maybe it is just
777.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
That's wild.
778.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
In practice it doesn't work in the short term but it should work in the long term because Google processes so much data with billions of data points so their algorithms need some time to catch up. Sad but true. The same situation is wi
779.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
This article is akin to dot-com bubble mentality: "Internet sucks", "Internet is dead, move on" etc. but then Amazon, Google and Facebook rose, proved critics wrong and got mad rich doing it. If engagement and revenue is
780.
▲
by
mrkramer
4y ago
So apparently nobody cares anymore?! Big Pharma had good run but luckily for them boosters will still be used for years to come.
More ›