mrkeen

11 ms·

181.
by mrkeen 4mo ago
'Keeping up with regulations' may as well be a separate field from the core stuff. It has the same pressures as any other development effort. Managers will want the integration to the KYC service LLM'd as quickly as possibl
182.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
> fork() is a relatively expensive system call; it must copy the entire process state (including memory) for the child process. Many optimizations have been made over the years, but a fork is still a fundamentally costly operation. To ma
183.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
> don’t use recursion: spends multiple paragraphs implying that a function calling itself isn’t recursion It did the opposite. It wrote many paragraphs of code and threw each one out as soon as recursion showed up.
184.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
I dunno what version of the site you saw, but it probably hasn't changed in the last 17 minutes since your post. There's only one rule: generative AI cannot be used in the creation of the project.
185.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
OP paid a machine to have those moments instead of him.
186.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
> Test the speed in our live coding playground: playground.kog.ai > Dsatur in Haskell #include <iostream> #include <vector> #include <algorithm> using namespace std; int main() { int n; cin >&g
187.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
> Pardon my ignorance trying to follow up on what is most likely sarcasm but is this not Kafka's claim to fame? Yes > I am joining a new project and need to know to what extent Kafka is still a part of the future for new big data
188.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
This is correct, but databases only help to the extent that the whole world is happy to live in your database. As soon as you have customers (who interact via REST), or partner payment systems (e.g. stripe) you're back to: Two cust
189.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
You wouldn't implement the "plus 2" program in an actor system this way, because of race conditions . Same as you wouldn't implement the "plus 2" program in an OO, functional, or this way, because of race con
190.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
A race condition: Two processes intend to add two to a number. They each read the current value. Then they each write back the value which is two bigger then the original. If you instead use private fields and public getters&#x
191.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
Yes
192.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
> Nondeterminism is not a feature you want. I can get behind the sentiment, but you absolutely need nondeterminism. You can separate the d from the non-d, but only Haskellish languages even attempt it. It's a coarse separation to
193.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
"You can't" is simpler, because the inevitable reply is "but how do I do actual logging inside g"
194.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
Don't declare it as non-logging.
195.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
No, they are function colouring. That's the point. Someone writes a post lamenting red and blue functions, and everyone eats it up. Substitute colour for something meaningful and the idea becomes idiotic. "Top level function de
196.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
So the following should be a boolean expression ? input.ariaDescribedByElements = [helpText]; No, the article calls for Equals to be assigned Assignment. With a healthy does of implicit getters on the LHS.
197.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
Yep. But we all know that one machine can and will fail (or be patched and restarted), so the log needs to be distributed. Different workflows should probably go in different buckets or "topics" for clarity. Since it's dist
198.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
Can't get past Anubis. Guess I'm an AI crawler?
199.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
I will try harder to connect the dots more explicitly. Do you think an idea being 'self-centered' has any bearing on whether that idea is true or false? What are the typical atheist arguments from Dawkins, etc.? Why are they not a
200.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
> Much less self centered than assume we’re developed from a mud on our own, without any external intervention. No. "From mud" is strictly less egocentric than "in God's image" for any possible interpretation. &
201.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
Will concede that, if you can get from "there is no proof of not-god" to supporting any claim about the nature of reality according to faith or scripture.
202.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
Arrogance, self-centeredness, "militancy" (laughable when applied to elderly armchair thinkers who call for no-one's death) are all criticisms of humans and have nothing to do with objective reality. But while we're look
203.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
The fact that the brain can trip should be taken as evidence that, when the supernatural happens, a better explanation is someone's brain is tripping, and the supernatural isn't actually happening.
204.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
I love that failure is an option. Despite all the pressure from money, the science still won out. In a parallel universe, it would be hard to imagine that much money not altering the reported results significantly.
205.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
Let's settle on having three then. (If you had just one, it would look pretty silly calling himself father and praying to himself.)
206.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
> the ultimate implication of it is that nothing can be defined since everything is a continuum. What does this even mean?
207.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
If you need a god to explain where the universe came from, induction would like a word with you
208.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
Or maybe you're not allowed to! https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-tetragrammaton/ Chalk this up as one more disagreement between believers (that they really should have settled by now, given their
209.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
I always used to wonder this about software stacks even prior to LLMs, but it seems more relevant now somehow: When will Uber (or your favourite company) be 'done'? They've been writing software for 16 years. They match dri
210.
by mrkeen 5mo ago
My last job was for a product which launched with a promise of a free tier forever, which they removed a year or two ago.

More ›