mrexcess

9 ms·

91.
by mrexcess 9mo ago
Some really excellent points, here. I think reading the old HIG documents should be mandatory in UI design, and departure from it should require serious justification. One small nitpick: the ellipsis reuse in item #8 - that’s actually valid
92.
by mrexcess 9mo ago
>In 2005 Israel end the occupation in Gaza This is misinformation. Although Israel did pull its settlers from most of Gaza in 2005, it retained air, sea, and land border control. That is still a military occupation. The reality is, Israe
93.
by mrexcess 9mo ago
Disagree wholeheartedly. The only relevant litmus test is: "Did the accused party commit the offense they are accused of?" ...everything else is whataboutism, red herring, ad hominem, and DARVO. If the worlds worst person says 2+2
94.
by mrexcess 9mo ago
>Their point still stands: neither Israel nor the USA recognize the authority of the ICC Many others have already pointed out the fact here - that Palestine is under ICC jurisdiction. Instead what I want to focus on is WHY YOU DID NOT KN
95.
by mrexcess 9mo ago
>It's vastly outnumbered by Muslim countries, which is why traditionally Israel has received more criticism in the UN How is this anything but DARVO? Israel receives criticism in the UN for reasons that are easily verified and quite
96.
by mrexcess 9mo ago
>Francesca Albanese is conducting warfare HN moderation will protect outlandish hyperbolic comments like this, won't it? If it needed to be said, Francesca Albanese is not conducting warfare. She's doing her job as a UN Special
97.
by mrexcess 9mo ago
>Might makes right in international politics. But the whole point of Nuremberg was to prevent this, the whole idea of international law was meant to prevent this. The judges of Nuremberg warned us about this outcome. In a world where hum