mrdazm

8 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by mrdazm 7y ago

   Bring on the questions! I don’t mind one bit. Feel free to tweet or email me if needed too (email at the bottom of the landing page)! What’s funny is earlier versions of the landing page had way more detail for what you’re asking about and
2. 32.▲
   by mrdazm 7y ago

   Thanks for your thoughts and the clarification to your original point I understand your set and forget mentality with respect to paying a single fee, setting Passbox up and then leaving it be. Does that change for you at all given the fact
3. 33.▲
   by mrdazm 7y ago

   Are you presuming a scenario where the company would go dark with no notice?
4. 34.▲
   by mrdazm 7y ago

   Thanks for your reply! I’m not tied to pricing at all and had to start somewhere. There’s been pretty good discussion on it throughout this post. I’ll consider everything while also taking into account this being the HN crowd. I personally
5. 35.▲
   by mrdazm 7y ago

   I have - before this post even. It's been mentioned a few times in this post too. It's something to think about but not a current priority. Thanks for the suggestion! Oh, it's called Shamir's Secret Sharing by the way
6. 36.▲
   by mrdazm 7y ago

   Thanks for this. LP is cheaper depending on how many users you have. My current model allows for unlimited trusted users (people who can request access to your account) for the same price. LP charges per user.
7. 37.▲
   by mrdazm 7y ago

   That's awesome
8. 38.▲
   by mrdazm 7y ago

   Thanks for checking it out! Apologies for not striking the right balance of brevity while also being informative for you. I'm trying to improve there. All the sensitive data is encrypted at rest using a key/passphrase determined b
9. 39.▲
   by mrdazm 7y ago

   According to the post below they exist now. I'm hoping for recommendations! https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21345210
10. 40.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    Thanks for this. In my opinion that's not ideal because: 1. They'd have access right then and there 2. You could use a traditional password manager for that 3. Data changes could become more of a hassle to keep up-to-date
11. 41.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    What are some such tools that you know about/recommend? I've also considered this for Passbox but needed to start simply.
12. 42.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    I'm with you. That's one of the big challenges I (and anyone in the space, I presume) would have from outset. On the bright side Passbox would only be random until it's not. The right news article, partnership or some other f
13. 43.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    To me I think that'd definitely work with static content/data and of course physical items. Things like passwords, accounts, devices and any special notes you may want to leave can change pretty often and presumably could become a
14. 44.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    That's an idea for sure. What could be interesting is cases of some credentials/data/whatever being shared among multiple folks. So do you wait until each person has viewed/downloaded then close? Do I (Passbox) notify ev
15. 45.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    One potential benefit of something like a Passbox is that the important accounts would be ideally listed out vs having to guess what they are then reset the password via your gmail etc.
16. 46.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    Definitely. It'll be interesting for me to balance my recurring costs while matching with consumer ideals. To be continued...
17. 47.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    Definitely but with more of a focus on the assigning/sharing of data primarily than being a pw manager.
18. 48.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    Thanks for the head's up!
19. 49.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    It took me a while to even mention death in my copy but I know I have to embrace it - it's part of life!
20. 50.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    Wow. This hits way too close to home. Thanks for sharing!
21. 51.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    100% agreed with you here - no denying it - and no different from any service that we use where it's up to our trust that they will do the right thing. That said, I can for sure revisit my encryption strategy. Overall that's one u
22. 52.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    I appreciate this. Thanks! I'm using Stripe at the moment.
23. 53.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    It would be a shame if somehow, you know, being able to delete data became an uber-premium feature :D
24. 54.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    Coincidentally just addressed that here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21344759
25. 55.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    I've thought about this. Not a final decision per se (and I haven't coded anything for the scenario) but I imagine I'd maybe have the third party accessing the data pay (up to a cap) to reconcile the account to make it "
26. 56.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    You'd really be giving the company garbled (read: encrypted) data and allowing folks you care about access to your actual data/passwords/notes/whatever.
27. 57.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    I have _no_ idea what you're talking about. :) (Read: Thanks a ton!)
28. 58.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    If this actually goes anywhere I personally wouldn't shut the company down silently. I'd have contact information for everyone involved to help them prep for its sunsetting.
29. 59.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    > If you're finding that the users you're sharing your passbox with are requesting your passwords every day This is an interesting scenario I've thought about. Thanks for sharing! It could be the case that once the "d
30. 60.▲
    by mrdazm 7y ago

    And with lifetime pricing I don't like the idea of just keeping that money if someone churns. Maybe I'm just not enough of a hardened business person haha. In your case with Bitwarden you're sharing access to your credentials