mrcheesebreeze

11 ms·

61.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
also its similar to watchdogs, in that game series the companies used ai to predict crimes and stole tons of user data to profit by selling it. we are already dealing with the latter irl, hopefully the former doesn't come to fruition.
62.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
its because we inherently rely on them too much to produce products. If we fight them both us and them lose out on enough trade to do a lot of damage. they need our money, we need their stuff, we are shackled together.
63.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
many people, nowadays if you disagree with the current president his entire "side" will insult you. It was a conspiracy theory, according to liberals, to believe that the vaccine would be mandatory and that it would not stop the d
64.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
because there are double standards for certain groups. Nowadays if you are religious or conservatives you are a bigot nazi and should be demonized always. This isn't one sided though, conservatives demonize liberals as terrorist commie
65.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
depends what was in the books, many "woke" books are just inappropriate for kids.
66.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
An alternative reason could be that they are in a great place right now. Despite the usa's promises, china's economic chokehold could theoretically let them invade with few repercussions. It would explain the slow but increasing e
67.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
I don't believe that. There is a certain point where its just impossible, you can't make something like that.
68.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
yes, that's why he gave certain groups more preference. He talked a big game but wasn't new. Remember how he, like most recent presidents, shilled for the apartheid state israel? He was a harder to control stooge so he was ditched
69.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
just set an alarm on your phone, I can't understand how someone could have this problem.
70.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
they literally pushed to purge so many russian stuff and to screw russian citizens on the internet a few months ago. they can't get mad on this issue because if they can force this on other nations then nations can decide to do it to t
71.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
actually banks are one of the worst ways to store money for real emergencies. In the event of a bad recession you will quickly find the banks are more fragile than you thought. Multiple times in history people who thought the banks couldn&#
72.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
you are a very annoying person, its really not hard to understand. The guy doesn't like being ripped off. He rents what is marketed as rent-able, and wants what is marketed as something you buy to be actually so. Its a very basic conce
73.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
congrats, you just realized what the majority of tech "improvements" from the last few years really were. It was about making it easier for companies and gaining more control, not about the consumer. The tech world will only get w
74.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
thats why I often say real democracy and republics stop existing shortly after creation. They always descend into some sort of plutocracy where you can buy politicians loyalty or a dictatorship. for example: america - plutocracy, russia - d
75.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
thats why if you have reserve funds they need to not be in us banks, they can close down and go out of business in a recession. Take physical wealth and move somewhere else if a really bad one happens.
76.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
the us dollar is quite fragile too. Remember that it had to invade libya and iraq to stop them from selling oil in other currencies. If the saudi and other arab nations' deals with china and their acquiring of yuans are significant, it
77.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
here's a funny idea: no islamic golden age which meant no european enlightenment. Yeah middle earth's history is completely different, there is no europe or arabia. Despite this it would be funny that the easterling's lack of
78.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
no but you don't understand "muh freedomz" erases the destabalization of the middle east and large swaths of africa despite us doing it for zero reason. it also erases our allies killing and starving the yemenis and the starv
79.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
also they splintered into multiple khanates early on with the great khans only having some respect rather than the ability to stop the infighting.
80.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
You just decribed the appeal of sandbox games in the most morbid way lol. You are right, games let us do things you couldn't and they just give you more control. Sandbox games specifically just let you do whatever you want, from testin
81.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
pov: you play hearts of iron 4
82.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
furthermore if many westerners woke up they would realize that many people envy them like we envy billionaires. The average joe in america and many other places has more money in a month than many have a year, the average american or europe
83.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
there is no problem with being a billionare provided you do the near impossible and not hurt anyone to get it. Being rich isn't criminal, being criminal to get rich is.
84.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
can confirm, I see tons of offices for lease or rent now.
85.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
yeah but I was talking about brutality vs numbers. the commies killed far more than anyone by numbers and in barbaric ways, but their brutality was beaten by those who killed less in more gruesome ways. the mongols excelled at both but I ar
86.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
some mongol people to this day. People tend to ignore their ancestor's warcrimes. Even if they admit they were evil they can't bring themselves to hate them. This applies to most old empires, many people can't bring themselve
87.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
I don't know if we can call them the most evil. There are plenty of contenders, even if the death rates don't match up. If we go purely by deathrates then we should pick communist china or the soviet union. If we go by barbarity t
88.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
the main claim that borte ran the mongol empire, she didn't. She was a great help and most great leaders had amazing wives who helped them. Despite this her actions were greatly inflated by the title and main claim.
89.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
which is a fair point, but its a far cry from the claim of running the empire. The wives of many leaders tend to be important politically and have a hand in the nation's affairs, but its a large leap to claim that means they ran it. Sh
90.
by mrcheesebreeze 4y ago
he is being downvoted for the same reason this article exists, pc culture doesn't like being corrected. There is a war against historical accuracy for the sake of adding in women or random races that wouldn't be there. The annoyin

More ›