mrbungie

6 ms·

31.
by mrbungie 5mo ago
There is now an Antigravity CLI which will replace Gemini CLI. Gemini CLI is going to be EOLd by June 18th afaik. Antigravity CLI and GUI share the same agent harness, so it might do the same task. Source: https://developers.goog
32.
by mrbungie 5mo ago
He is saying that while holding Worldcoin as THE solution behind his back. He hopes to show it when the time comes.
33.
by mrbungie 5mo ago
Well, we were overall better for a couple of centuries after abolishing all-powerful kings + some welfare laws here and there (ymmv, maybe serfdom sounds nice to you). So those changes can work for a while, big emphasis on can and for a w
34.
by mrbungie 5mo ago
Yeah, I know AI is useful for that, that's why I said after I learn. Hopefully once.
35.
by mrbungie 5mo ago
0 tokens per command >>> Hundreds of tokens per command
36.
by mrbungie 5mo ago
It is difficult to believe that you can cobra effect yourself into greatness. I'd rather say the most useful perk for companies doing this is the AI-washing adoption metrics they can report, which will hopefully (for them) increase val
37.
by mrbungie 5mo ago
Once I learn a command that is both repeatable and useful, I prefer to either keep it in my mind or in my aliases. Thank you.
38.
by mrbungie 5mo ago
I still don't know how to reconcile these reports with what other people say about GenAI-agentic assisted engineering being the only way of working nowadays, especially in startups. Probably there is no dichotomy going on and it depend
39.
by mrbungie 5mo ago
Ofc, they were practically dying 30 years ago. But I can't really see why that's is relevant here.
40.
by mrbungie 5mo ago
Pretty sure Apple can survive a legal war like this. On the other hand, it sounds like OpenAI is punching above its weight.
41.
by mrbungie 5mo ago
The article makes it sound like OpenAI is really entitled in this one. Also legal action is obviously going to be a strong signal of OpenAI's friendliness /s.
42.
by mrbungie 5mo ago
I'm always wondering who has the time to consume all the new code that is being produced. Like sure, you can produce at 5-10X the speed, but is someone using those features? Not sure if the typical consumer mind can keep up with such s
43.
by mrbungie 5mo ago
Investors actually want slop-branded AI on everything right now, so it checks out for companies to maximize for it. We are so fucked.
44.
by mrbungie 5mo ago
You usually don't get immediate responses from hires which means delayed gratification and avoiding much of the potential dopaminergic effects you get when engaging with LLMs. You can play overextending the hire analogy all you want bu
45.
by mrbungie 5mo ago
The gambling part is because of the (hopefully emergent and not purposefully designed) intermittent reinforcement due to the limits. You don't get that with regular hires.
46.
by mrbungie 6mo ago
The user will be adversarial and probably learn new tricks to trick the machine, this is not solvable (only) via training data.
47.
by mrbungie 6mo ago
Is it though? I thought elite engineers needed to consume billions of tokens monthly and/or pay >100 USD subscriptions to AI tools to realize their potential.
48.
by mrbungie 6mo ago
Is psychohistory a thing now? They are just another actor, for sure they have relevant usage data but (1) their view are biased in multiple ways (at least due to perverse incentives), knowingly and unknowingly (2) they are experts in their
49.
by mrbungie 6mo ago
That’s on Anthropic, but also on the broader trend. AI companies and the current state of ML research got us into this reproducibility mess. Papers and peer review got replaced by white papers, and clear experimental setups got replaced by
50.
by mrbungie 6mo ago
They are in a three-way tension between price, quantity/quality and promises of growth to investors (time horizon-sensitive). Nudge one factor too much and the house of cards falls down.
51.
by mrbungie 6mo ago
Then it's contained but depending on the user it can be a vector for a (para)-social engineering attack. PS: It is Gemini based, that's an LLM.
52.
by mrbungie 6mo ago
Not defending GH, but that's what tsunamies of slop can do to a system.
53.
by mrbungie 6mo ago
Pretty sure simonw's lethal trifecta [1] has not been "fairly well" mitigated. [1] https://simonwillison.net/2025/Jun/16/the-lethal-trifecta/
54.
by mrbungie 6mo ago
At the same time I'd say sloppy code (human or AI generated) is rarely the best choice. I'd say the best is in between.
55.
by mrbungie 6mo ago
We can thank our AI overlords like sama and damodei for that.
56.
by mrbungie 6mo ago
They need to offer more 9s of availability before this happens though.
57.
by mrbungie 6mo ago
> So for a lot of companies, it's worth using AI to create a replacement. I'll add the nuance that those might be big companies with slack capacity, or at least firms that already are at a point in their effort/performance
58.
by mrbungie 6mo ago
I've seen Antigravity outputting chinese characters in its thinking traces from time-to-time. I also remember chinese being discussed as a potential orchestrating language but I don't remember the sources, so 100% anecdotical.
59.
by mrbungie 7mo ago
His argument is not about LLM tools but rather about which architecture is better suited for coding with LLMs.
60.
by mrbungie 7mo ago
From you can tell from they long-term strategy they are not marketing geniuses, but rather they try to signal are "moral geniuses". That's the game they are playing, I don't really know if it is going to work or not.

More ›