mrbukkake

5 ms·

31.
by mrbukkake 5y ago
Nice idea, naive implementation which leads to the output being unconvincing as hypothetical English words. I had a brief look and it seems to be proportionally selecting and sticking together sequences of letters sampled from English words
32.
by mrbukkake 5y ago
Absolutely. These debates are as old as linguistics, there was a lot of controversy in the 19th century between supporters of the tree and wave theories. It's an active area of debate now too with a lot of cross pollination between bio
33.
by mrbukkake 5y ago
Some of the assumptions about language in this paper are just total junk lol... this one is particularly good "...and for the rest, overlapping vocabulary is a good proxy for similar languages" - this is so wrong I don't even
34.
by mrbukkake 5y ago
you have no idea what you're talking about mate
35.
by mrbukkake 5y ago
>Scala also seems to have something of a racism/white supremacy/misogyny problem. lol what
36.
by mrbukkake 5y ago
I can't tell whether or not this article is parody... is this a new kind of turing test
37.
by mrbukkake 5y ago
Can anyone tell me what the value of GPT-3 actually is other than generating meaningless prose? What would a business use it for
38.
by mrbukkake 5y ago
This comment is pretentious gibberish. What are you actually trying to say? The only concrete critique you seem to be making is that people don't learn "cellular biology" or its "electromagnetic phenomena" at medica
39.
by mrbukkake 5y ago
Yeah the results speak for themselves alright - mass surveillance, hideous pollution, oceans of pointless junk. Get a grip man