Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mrb
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
95 ms
·
931.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
The author of TFA didn't write "perfectly accurate" but "land mass size on a relative scale". Bud is correct.
932.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
« Fidelity also has an extremely attractive product in their cash management account (free checking account with ATM reimbursements) » Yes, just like Charles Schwab. I wonder why most Americans don't know about this and either pay ATM
933.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
« it turns out today a top consumer (not HEDT) CPU barely matches this pair of CPUs » Well, the X5670 was a high-end 2P server CPU sold for $1400 ( https://ark.intel.com/products/47920/Intel-Xeon-Processor-X5... ) s
934.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
« Using Gmail as a smart host defeats the point as mentioned in the root comment of this thread: Google can read your email. » Many things wrong with this sentence: • Don't like Google? Then use any of the hundreds of other smart host
935.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
I don't think you read or understood what I wrote. You were not routing through a smart host (third party SMTP relay.) This is your problem. There is a specific reason I recommend doing so: the reputation of the sending IP address al
936.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
You can perfectly "host your own email server" while sending outgoing mail through a smart host. No falsely-tagged-spam issue that way.
937.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
« Don't keep it all in one place » It's shocking how many people make this error. Walter White buries millions of dollars in only one spot in Breaking Bad. People make only one copy of their cryptocurrency wallet seed. People have
938.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
Well, remember the entire point of U2F is to not be phishable. Authentication codes—and your smart watch—are phishable.
939.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
« I think the truth about blockchain is that the fad is over. It’s been 9 years. At one point I could buy coffee with bitcoin, today I can’t even turn my remaining crypto into fiat. » It's pretty clear that being able to transact and s
940.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
Decidedly, statistics is hard. Everything above is wrong. Let's label the twenty drives D0 through D19. There are 2^20 possible scenarios, which can be represented as a string of 20 bits: • 00000000000000000000 = all 20 drives are work
941.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
Yes, but this was the OP's scenario: what happens when 3% of drives all fail at the same time when the DC is powered back on. Edit: actually the math is still wrong. The chance any 4 out of 20 drive is failing is: .03^4 × C(20,4) = .03
942.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
Oh you are right. The OP still has a slight error though. C(20,4) = 4845 possible combinations of failing drives (4 out of 20.) Therefore the chance a file is irrecoverable is: .97^16 × .03^4 × 4845 = 0.241% (not 0.3%) But the OP's con
943.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
« The chances that you only have 16 good drives for a file is about (0.97^16 ∗ 0.03^4)∗20∗19∗18 = 0.3% Yet your customer has 100k files! The chance they can recover all their data is only (1-0.003)^100000... Which means every customer suffe
944.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
Highly doubtful. You don't even have to trust the word of their financial auditors to get convinced. Just knowing that AMZN's growth over the last 10+ years was entirely self-funded is clear evidence they have cash laying around t
945.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
« They are not wildly profitable (if at all). » Often repeated, but wrong. Their financials might show almost no net income (just $3B) but that's just because they choose to reinvest every dollar of gross profits into themselves to gro
946.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
« I am not sure how you are getting half hour indications on that weekly chart. » See https://i.myimg.io/wi9J.png « The EIA web site was talking about October » This is why I also showed an October chart, with a peak at 3-4
947.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
Your chart is even less granular than mine (hourly vs half-hourly), and it has a timezone conversion error. The source they use (ISO New England - https://www.iso-ne.com/isoexpress/ ) shows the peak of a typical October
948.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
Residential-only energy use is irrelevant. What matters is peak grid usage (ie. residential+industrial) and it is actually mid-day—perfect for solar. For example the UK's real time grid monitoring system clearly shows this peak on the
949.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
Can I use it‽
950.
▲
Unicode – Full Emoji List, v11.0
(unicode.org)
2 points
by
mrb
8y ago
|
0 comments
951.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
You are right that Summit is overbuilt if it was going to be used just for raw crypto mining hashpower. However, even so, it would be quite profitable... The last double spend attack on BTG stole ~$20M. There is no reason to think it couldn
952.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
The trend of power consumption is no different between GPUs and ASICs. Either way, miners will always be competing to add more and more capacity.
953.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
The number one supercomputer on the TOP500 list, Summit, is able to majority-attack about 95% of cryptocurrencies that are GPU-mined: https://twitter.com/zorinaq/status/1007005472505978880 That's one advantag
954.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
Agreed. I'm worried SAE hasn't received as much peer review as other PAKE protocols. IMHO they should have gone with J-PAKE ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Password_Authenticated_Key_Exc... ) which is one of th
955.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
The author claims Satoshi Nakamoto's vision was that miners would use repurposable chips ("one-CPU-one-vote") but this is false. Satoshi correctly envisioned mining farm would eventually use specialized hardware: « as the ne
956.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
« As stated in other comments, Bitcoin is hardly anonymous anymore » Cryptocurrencies ≠ Bitcoin. There are quite a few cryptocurrencies that provide full anonymity (eg. Zcash with its zk-SNARKs.) Besides, Bitcoin is sufficiently anonymous f
957.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
I use the NATO alphabet when spelling my name to people in customer service. About 1 in 4 service representatives seem completely baffled, like they have never heard anything like it, and ask me to respell a 2nd or 3rd time. I even say &quo
958.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
I'm surprised you think the price matters. It doesn't. It's an index fund. Crypto traders will trade it regardless if it's low or high. In fact it's probably even better to launch it now (low price = buying opportun
959.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
« So given that for BTC to become a successful reserve currency » Your premise is wrong to start with... BTC could be very successful without necessarily being a major worldwide reserve currency! « But that's more electricity than curr
960.
▲
by
mrb
8y ago
« Why choses to owe more in interest when they can afford to pay the debt? » Easy: they could expect to make more profits than the cost of interest. « I think in the absence of actual numbers... » In the absence of actual numbers, the journ
More ›