mrangle

44 ms·

541.
by mrangle 3y ago
Provide proof by de-anonymizing one data set from research within the past five years.
542.
by mrangle 3y ago
Data has been sufficiently anonymized for decades.
543.
by mrangle 3y ago
You're attempting to make an argument against any anonymized data being used in research. You'd have to do better than a hypothetical to make headway with it. Moreover, the logic would have to carry over to the very common practic
544.
by mrangle 3y ago
The "actual scientific research" will be most abundant and reliable for ADHD being correlated with this symptom. In fact, ADHD is frequently diagnosed using only this symptom along with any quantity of unavoidable life inhibiting
545.
by mrangle 3y ago
>Well I feel seen today. At times in my youth I seriously questioned whether I had schizophrenia... but I never developed the symptoms. Autism has seeming yet superficial symptomatic crossover with schizophrenia to the point that only a
546.
by mrangle 3y ago
Masked ADHD? Just ADHD. There is no progression. Meds are unreliable. Moreover, my opinion is that this particular place on the spectrum is where ADHD and Asperger's meet. Stated differently, the puzzle of ADHD-PI may be that it is ins
547.
by mrangle 3y ago
True. Over time, I noticed less undesirable weight fluctuation and even weight loss when eating pasta. Also, it felt like a light meal. The trick is to not eat pasta with bread. Many people forget about the bread that they commonly combine
548.
by mrangle 3y ago
Yes, there's a benefit. Sugar is beneficial in moderation. On the subject, see biochemist Ray Peat's writing.
549.
by mrangle 3y ago
As someone who has a couple of decades of zero sugar fasting, strict paleo, and ultra low calorie dieting under his belt, this isn't true. There's nothing just fine about what happens when muscle glycogen depletes after several da
550.
by mrangle 3y ago
Again, with the misuse of language in order to create the illusion of a point. In this case, in an attempt to create a ridiculously reductionist hallucination that the human brain is in the same essential category as a tree, toy, or compute
551.
by mrangle 3y ago
There's isn't a mathematical model of how thinking works, let alone of the entire organism. So no, respectfully. A theory that thinking equals math and so math must at some point equal thought (and then emotion) remains inhibited
552.
by mrangle 3y ago
>"Asked whether AI systems might one day have emotional intelligence and understand that they have feelings" There isn't a relationship between these two states. It's weird that anyone would pair them in conjunction.
553.
by mrangle 3y ago
Now do the inverse analysis. Hold liable anyone in an official position who directly incited virtually an entire election-year of violent riots that mostly targeted and victimized innocents. There's precedent in the making for that typ
554.
by mrangle 3y ago
Don't interrupt grand nationalist narratives and proofs with logic. Especially when the proofs are in the form of cowboy quips from its heroes. You won't win.
555.
by mrangle 3y ago
Arguing the personnel politics of the hypothetically fake Moon landing addresses a different argument than the one that I and the OP were addressing. Whether or not I agree with your assessment. In regard to the need to "fool" the
556.
by mrangle 3y ago
However, you miss the point of the American Revolution and the government that followed. Which specifically is to suppress tyrants. Stated otherwise, it is to limit those who are willing to act on their own behalf in a manner that oppresses
557.
by mrangle 3y ago
The amount of people necessary to fool people believing something happened that didn't isn't necessarily (much) greater than the amount it would take to pull it off. For argument's sake, imagine that everyone at NASA was work
558.
by mrangle 3y ago
Yes, a flippant response. The flippant response is well deserved. It's audacious of you to defend unreadable grammar. An indecipherable double negative is word salad, as is the referential sentence that follows it. Again, because the s
559.
by mrangle 3y ago
It would be inaccurate if the charges were limited to property destruction.
560.
by mrangle 3y ago
Read assault laws. As is common, you are conflating assault with battery.
561.
by mrangle 3y ago
There are no protected class allowances for assault. This thread is a menagerie of legal misunderstanding and buzzword abuse.
562.
by mrangle 3y ago
>No. No cop goes into the profession expecting puppies and rainbows. Going into potentially unsafe environments with potentially aggressive people is what they signed up for. That's not how law enforcement works at all. What you are
563.
by mrangle 3y ago
Uses aggregate numbers then transitions to relative probability as if the math logic follows. This thread is a clown show.
564.
by mrangle 3y ago
As with crime statistics, you need percentages to make a point and not aggregate numbers. Also tell us which other professionals are murdered by guns on American streets for doing their jobs, at this rate.
565.
by mrangle 3y ago
"Doesn't work" is nonsense language that arises from a clinically neurotic view of reality, which is in response to my patronizing (if practical) response to a clinically neurotic view of urban life.
566.
by mrangle 3y ago
Garbage poll. It utilized questions that close to zero Americans would disagree with, in that the policies in question aren't controversial and are already enforced. Ignoring the intentionally murky language of the third question. And
567.
by mrangle 3y ago
Very, very few innocent people are being shot and assaulted by police. You're using hyperbole to throw the discussion off track. Read the post to which I was replying and stop ruining any chance of discourse with nonsense claims. Your
568.
by mrangle 3y ago
Take a step back from what, exactly? What they stated was factual and generally complete. The event in question was not someone telling a cop to F off. There are plenty of chargeable variations within the gamut of your polar examples.
569.
by mrangle 3y ago
There aren't protected class allowances for assault. This thread, more than others on HN, fatally suffers from abuse of jargon. Your last two sentences are word salad. Between the double negative and hyperbole I have zero idea what you
570.
by mrangle 3y ago
They're being prosecuted for smirking at cops while destroying pro-cop signage, which can be read as assault. Ask yourself whether in today's age someone could get away with destroying an LGBT sign amidst a pro-LGBT protest, while

More ›