Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mqsiuser
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
20 ms
·
91.
▲
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
Fred Brooks statements are like 40 years old and it's important what he said :) I am on the things sucks side. IT seems to be in it's dark age And it's negative that teams don't scale ;) And the single one genius (that h
92.
▲
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
Scrum just heavily annoyed me (and others) on my last project The software business has problems that are not properly solved and we need to do work with that (create business value) But it's even on heavy debate HOW to DO things (not
93.
▲
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
I have a MBPR with the current Ubuntu. For non techies I'd say: Too hard (just use MacOS). For techies: No {, } and no @ (need to copy it from somewhere). I still prefer it over MacOS. Nice Hardware + dualboot with MacOS. I actually li
94.
▲
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
Basically Marc created a super successful company And now there are a lot people profiting from that I don't say that she might not be a great designer or that her contribution isn't awesome or that the job is easy. I am just sayi
95.
▲
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
Very nicely written. With key value stores and NOSQL we correct the mistake (a bit)? Things just develop and afterwards you can explain (the failure). My Professor said, it's with people that had success with one thing and then everyon
96.
▲
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
Hey, I am doing the "case against XML" here. On JSON: I'd require others to comment, whether it is declarative or extensible (enough). Whether this is required (or not) for the use cases we have. Mark-up?! ;)
97.
▲
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
I've never been to Hursley. Just www.mqseries.net :)
98.
▲
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
who knows of it, who uses it ? There may be like circles (ofc... the circle of live ;), but not the same (different things are different :)
99.
▲
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
That is so old (2003). It is so much (am I supposed to read it?) (what is LISP ;). And it is so wrong: "XML is simple to parse": If I (I am a parser... or parser writer) hit the end of something then it is just the end: So it is &
100.
▲
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
JSON seems to be fine without (a "schema language") Why is that ? I know the answer: No-one ever requested it O.k. xsd uses XML and I just made the CASE AGAINST XML (itself) You may reduce XML to "elements only", but the
101.
▲
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
> but XML is cool when it flows and has available tools That's just excuses ("having tools") for failing (on an aspect) If flows ? :-) It's been a great contribution thank you TBL! Thank you. (Let's move on) >
102.
▲
Killing XML (it's my pleasure)
3 points
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
|
11 comments
103.
▲
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
This project is about Computer Science. It is about finding THE SINGLE RIGHT WAY THERE IS (for fast message transformation) I helped IBM on some (important) parts of Broker... this will get interesting to divide this up ;)
104.
▲
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
There is nothing, there is no problem SOA invented a problem and then tried to solve it: You hack together HTTP + JSON and that's it (Roy Fielding... thank you for "REST", but I am not sure what you are saying) The backend do
105.
▲
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
> Do you have some programs that can benefit by having an open source version? It's always and ever beneficial to (have the ability) to look into the source code And the price ;) > It will be a wonderful exercise in digging up su
106.
▲
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
> I'll agree that Microsoft, IBM and Oracle (Tibco, etc) would prefer that you were passing SOAP/XML over enterprise busses They better say bye to this idea... it's hard to see why curly braces are good and angle brackets
107.
▲
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
So I have been open sourcing the heart of a super expensive IBM software product, which IBM currently/today sells regularly for 100 tsd (Dollar or Euro, doesn't matter much) per CPU core (discounts of 40% to 95% usually apply). Th
108.
▲
Open Sourcing super expensive proprietary software
(usethetree.com)
8 points
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
|
13 comments
109.
▲
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
Let's say mildly that SOA failed and unfortunately the remaining parts are not "a lot". I was in fact able to understand them and it's been possible for me to open source the very most important parts in a POC. So the ve
110.
▲
SOA – the good parts
(use-the-tree.com)
1 points
by
mqsiuser
12y ago
|
1 comments