mpweiher

58 ms·

781.
We have outgrown the Process model(sidhion.com)
2 points by mpweiher 1y ago|2 comments
782.
by mpweiher 1y ago
They haven't ruled yet. I also read what they published so far. Bizarrely, it matches what the <checks notes> head of the ICJ said. Who would have thought?
783.
Swift 6.2 Released(swift.org)
2 points by mpweiher 1y ago|3 comments
784.
by mpweiher 1y ago
They have not. https://x.com/Mr_Andrew_Fox/status/1783621258032136550
785.
by mpweiher 1y ago
They have not.
786.
by mpweiher 1y ago
Go look at the report and the org and the people in it. There is nothing "legitimate" about it. The head of this alleged body is a staunch anti-Israel activist who is not taken seriously. https://en.wikipedia.org/w
787.
by mpweiher 1y ago
How is "running a pool of Python worker processes" different from having a microservice?
788.
by mpweiher 1y ago
No, I bring ChatGPT because you make sweeping generalized statements that are too ridiculous to bring any detail to. Anyway, there is no use discussing with you, as you just repeat the same lies over and over. Just one example: > Also lo
789.
by mpweiher 1y ago
> and nothing industrial yet. So you have a big nothing-burger. Once again: there is no significant investment, because there is no Uranium shortage . Uranium is cheap and plentiful. Applies to your entire reply, no need to go repeat
790.
by mpweiher 1y ago
Why do you lie so blatantly on something that is so easily checked and disproven? Japan has restarted at least 14 reactors. https://www.modernpowersystems.com/analysis/re-establishing-... https://pris.iaea.o
791.
by mpweiher 1y ago
I never disputed that it's a fact that China currently builds more renewables than nuclear. I said it is irrelevant . Those are different things. It's also not "way" more...unless you don't understand the irrele
792.
by mpweiher 1y ago
The "nonsense" from the "tabloids" with no direct involvement or experience with the subject...like former Chancellor Gerhard Schröder, who initiated/approved the Nordstream 1 pipeline https://www.youtube
793.
by mpweiher 1y ago
Sorry, I have no time to debunk all the disinformation you put out. > China: Keeps announcing reactors without starting to build them. I asked ChatGPT: Is it true that China keeps announcing nuclear reactors without building any? ChatGPT
794.
by mpweiher 1y ago
LOL. An overview article that was obsolete even in 2016 when it was published. You need to get with the times. "... the amount of uranium in seawater is truly renewable as well as inexhaustible." "New technological breakthr
795.
by mpweiher 1y ago
You are making the very common "mistake" of comparing 1 nuclear accident with 1 wind turbine accident. And are completely missing that you need a LOT more wind turbines, and these have a lot more accidents. For example, wind turbi
796.
by mpweiher 1y ago
Sorry, you are still incorrect. Nuclear had a record production year in 2024, despite the German exit. 2025 is predicted to be another record year. There are currently 60+ reactors under construction, 90+ in preparation and 170+ announced&#
797.
by mpweiher 1y ago
No you are cherry picking specific examples that fit your incorrect claim. 6.5 years is the current average.
798.
by mpweiher 1y ago
Once again: EDF receives subsidies for their renewables projects.
799.
by mpweiher 1y ago
[nuclear license to print money] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbeJIwF1pVY "Jetzt müssen RWE und Co. die ausgedienten Gelddruckmaschinen sicher abwickeln." But that was the well-known pro nuclear lobby group...g
800.
by mpweiher 1y ago
"Interesting" unsubstantiated opinions. And counterfactual, as nuclear is immensely profitable and the world is investing in nuclear.
801.
by mpweiher 1y ago
> Nuclear fans could only dream of this rate of improvement. Nuclear doesn't need this rate of improvement, because it was always cheap. > Nuclear doesn't work in the sense of being competitive. Empirically false. Also: if
802.
by mpweiher 1y ago
6.5 years. https://www.sustainabilitybynumbers.com/p/nuclear-constructi...
803.
by mpweiher 1y ago
> Using resistive heating with nuclear electricity would be very foolish, unless you have a money wasting fetish. Hmm. "... if electricity is cheap enough." > Nuclear district heating would be very difficult to retrofit. Wh
804.
UK and US Announce Major Partnership in New 'Golden Age' of Nuclear Power(nucnet.org)
2 points by mpweiher 1y ago|1 comments
805.
The Synchronization Framework in Swift 6(blog.jacobstechtavern.com)
1 points by mpweiher 1y ago|0 comments
806.
by mpweiher 1y ago
> Ask Japan, and especially Fukushima's residents, about this. Yes, let's ask Japan! https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-12-16/japan-see... https://www.japantimes.co.jp/c
807.
by mpweiher 1y ago
My comment is exactly correct. EDF gets subsidies from the state for their renewables projects. EDF pays nuclear profits to the state. And to the rest of French industry via the ARENH program. Facts. That private money going into renewab
808.
by mpweiher 1y ago
> Let’s begin with concluding that you could not find a source for your claims. The source is the report by the French Cour des Comptes. I am not your research assistant. > I find it interesting how someone so smart can just lie thro
809.
by mpweiher 1y ago
> [renewables massively increased electricity prices, not decreased them as claimed] > We all have to consider the total cost on the long term. Yes, we do. When you consider long term, it gets even worse for intermittent renewables.
810.
by mpweiher 1y ago
> That truly does not make sense Reality doesn't have to make sense to you. > renewable subsidies are being phased out around the world Nope. Countries are trying to phase out renewables subsidies. And failing. Recently, the

More ›