mpthrapp

10 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by mpthrapp 12y ago

   No, I know that's what it is. I just want to hear the justification from the legal system how it's anything but that (assuming there even is one).
2. 32.▲
   by mpthrapp 12y ago

   I agree. This is a completely victim-less "crime". The part that bothers me the most, however, is that the girlfriend is not being charged too. Explain that. EDIT: Not that I think either of them should be charged, just that if on
3. 33.▲
   by mpthrapp 12y ago

   There's an unofficial ratings system for those who post the jobs[1] that most people who use MT with any sort of regularity (including myself back in the day) use. If a requester consistently fails to pay out, they'll stop getting
4. 34.▲
   by mpthrapp 12y ago

   I'm not as up on Quantum Computing as I'd like to be, but the title seems to imply that QC as a concept is no faster than regular computing. Which may be true for general purpose computing, but that's never what QC was intend
5. 35.▲
   by mpthrapp 12y ago

   The title is slightly misleading. This article is only talking about the performance of one specific quantum computer. (The D-Wave Two).