mpalmer

5 ms·

31.
by mpalmer 1mo ago
All credit to you for writing this yourself! PageRank, at its core, symbolizes these basic properties. This isn't what "symbolizes" means. You could use "embodies", "satisfies", "models&quot
32.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
Barely even a "distro"; it's built atop Arch.
33.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
The Solar Roof was never just a product. It was a pitch. All products long to become pitches. Most never do
34.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
AI;DR The maintainer(s) of the gosub browser engine are working on functionality intended to securely expose interactive/customization capabilities without allowing arbitrary scripting across all domains. One such capability is filteri
35.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
I did read it, thanks!
36.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
Which ones do you suppose they want their users to think of in connection with them?
37.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
It is way more accurate to say you authorized this rather than authored it. Honestly asking, do you think this post is easy/enjoyable for people to read? Do you intend for people to just paste it into an LLM chat to digest it?
38.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
I'm willing to bet it's because model providers have gone all-in on programming and reasoning ability when training new models. It's where the money is, if nothing else, and the writing quality will have suffered as a knock o
39.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
You're celebrating Bun 1.4 on literally day one. I'd suggest waiting for it to hit prod. irrespective of the political turmoil etc Quite the hand-wave!
40.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
This is the opposite of clickbait. The topic is obvious from the title.
41.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
How are you deciding that either of these things worked out fine
42.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
Was the idea to put a human face on the automated refactor? Can't say it's especially effective
43.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
This is not to brag is just to show how relatively easy you can do this on your Android phone. You haven't really explained how it works or how you did it, so at the moment it does just sound a bit like bragging :)
44.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
You seem to be responding the way Mr Altman wants.
45.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
I would genuinely like to hear from anyone who considers these 5000-word-plus AI-authored posts to be worthwhile, persuasive, and/or impressive.
46.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
It's a 400 word post stretched to over 6000 words, you go find the argument.
47.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
Maybe if you weren't really coding to begin with, or didn't enjoy it. There's a ton of "temporarily embarrassed CEOs" who seem to be unable to think about LLMs as anything but their employees, which is an incredibly
48.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
Next you'll tell me that Time Cube took a round of funding.
49.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
I'm glad to see someone feels similarly. There is nothing wrong with ignorance, but there's no excuse mistaking learning for invention. Especially from someone bearing the title "Developer Educator" I don't think
50.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
Yes, it's the reading equivalent of walking over gravel barefoot. The model didn't even help OP understand this thing which most investors learn pretty darn early.
51.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
Definitely. It's an inference crutch, like all the annoying uncanny features of LLM text. Models probably start doing this following reinforcement, because it's one of the nearest "paths" to staying on track with what th
52.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
That would be doing the wrong thing for precisely the wrong reasons.
53.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
The README is slop, so I truly don't care.
54.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
The game itself looks fun! The copy is awful. Which I suppose is expected at this point. It reads like the same Claude-ified marketing site slop we get in every third HN post. Why couldn't the author(s) spend the five minutes it would
55.
by mpalmer 2mo ago
Asking it explicitly is entirely, unavoidably, incomparably different from OP.
56.
by mpalmer 3mo ago
You should apply that big learn-y mind of yours to the policy around commenting. Don't be an asshole.
57.
by mpalmer 3mo ago
Yes, I understand normalcy bias. But who's talking about a collapse? Not OP. They say they are in an existential crisis, but not what it is, other than a vague "machines are getting smarter". They never describe what it is th
58.
by mpalmer 3mo ago
It feels so surreal watching all these things. People are still going to work. People are still planning vacations. And you know what. Maybe they are right and I am wrong. Maybe in their lifetimes, they won’t see any meaningful chang
59.
by mpalmer 3mo ago
Titling articles isn't about warning you.
60.
by mpalmer 3mo ago
We didn't add this for the post. It's just what the swarm already does, and it's the same machinery behind Script Workflows. What we hadn't done is measure it against Anthropic's own yardstick, with our

More ›