motoxpro

21 ms·

151.
by motoxpro 1y ago
I have the complete opposite take to the person who wrote this article. Most business books are collections of experiences with the takeaways that a person had based on those experiences, whether strategy, market dynamics of the time, uniqu
152.
by motoxpro 1y ago
Reduced the number of cases by 99%* That's amazing and I am very happy I live in a world where someone helped that many people, regardless of who you compare their accomplishments to.
153.
by motoxpro 1y ago
With that argument, you should use a “real” lawyer, or coder, or designer, or strategy consultant. Instead of an indifferent shrug, I would argue that paying attention to the fact that all of the things you mentioned are available now and p
154.
by motoxpro 1y ago
The HBR article I linked.
155.
by motoxpro 1y ago
It’s just the same thing as a take profit in the stock market. Intellectually it seems reasonable but because a lot of the bets go straight down (never raise another round for that take profit opportunity) you need a higher multiple of the
156.
by motoxpro 1y ago
The wild thing was this is what people "wanted" - The agreeableness came from heavier weighted user signals, not from OpenAI. The users give better feedback when the answers positively respond to their questions. - The most common
157.
by motoxpro 1y ago
I know the anthropomorphizing feels inaccurate to some. What is the "correct" way to describe this in one word other than "personality"? We use "respond" in programming, but a machine can't really "re
158.
by motoxpro 1y ago
Well articulated :). I can get on board with that
159.
by motoxpro 1y ago
It's just how you define "want." They a-b tested the algo vs chronological feed and the algo one because more people used it. It's just stated vs revealed preference. As a business, who's goal is to make money, does
160.
by motoxpro 1y ago
Just found https://radar.com/pricing 100k free calls/month.
161.
by motoxpro 1y ago
I think you're missing what makes consumer companies valuable. It's all about distribution. They get way more data (usage, browsing, etc.), they get 3.5 billion users (this is the main thing) and they get to be the interface for a
162.
by motoxpro 1y ago
Now ask your 10 year old to have a realtime conversation with you in over 50 languages in a few seconds with a perfect accent. I don't think it's very useful to think of the thing that humans/AI is the worst at and index on t
163.
by motoxpro 2y ago
You may not like them, as another poster said, it's all subjective. That doesn't mean they aren't incredibly good at what they do and that millions (billions) of people have tried to do what they have and failed. One of the r
164.
by motoxpro 2y ago
Totally agree. This is what Instagram and YouTube did and we got MrBeast and Kylie Jenner making billions of dollars. The cost of creating content is tapping record on your phone and the traditional "quality" as defined by visuals
165.
by motoxpro 2y ago
Looks like it is a "No" from them and a "All good" from us. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-meet-with-el-salvador...
166.
by motoxpro 2y ago
Don't let perfect be the enemy of fun
167.
by motoxpro 2y ago
TPU's are vertically integrated. If I was an investor and Google said they are going to now compete with Nvidia and TSMC I would take that as a sign they the leadership has completely lost the ability to see what their core competency
168.
by motoxpro 2y ago
So what you're saying is that people need to be aware of software being an iterative process and that maintainers of libraries can't know in advance all the things that might come up in 4 years time? I don't know of any softw
169.
by motoxpro 2y ago
I have no idea if this will be as big as an iPhone, but the early iPhone apps and development followed a similar trajectory. Viral flashlight apps and others that then got integrated into the OS, similar to API wrappers and viral photo make
170.
by motoxpro 2y ago
That's incredible how much it broadly aligns with what has happened. Especially because it was before ChatGPT.
171.
by motoxpro 2y ago
I would say that 99.99% of humans do the same. Most people never come up with anything novel.
172.
by motoxpro 2y ago
"creating a demand where there wasn't one before" Yes, 100% if it's a new product, there was no demand for it. "exploiting psychological weaknesses to prompt actions not necessarily in a person's best interest
173.
by motoxpro 2y ago
I guess my point is that "pushed on you whether you like it or not" is just a fact of if you re interested in said topic. Is it that you don't want an interruption? Because for the information to be out there, someone had to
174.
by motoxpro 2y ago
There no way to find out about anything if people don't advertise. Make a website? Advertising. Wear a band T-Shirt? Advertising. Make a website called Hacker News as VC firm? Advertising.
175.
by motoxpro 2y ago
Marketing is just raising awareness for things you might enjoy. I don't think it has to be that deep. They are doing marketing to get me to buy things. You are doing marketing to get me to NOT buy something. The iPhone enabled everyone
176.
by motoxpro 2y ago
My view is that the model is not the value. GPT-4o is not at the top of most LLM leaderboards, but ChatGPT is at the top of the AI product list. So far, there is at most a few months' gap between state-of-the-art and commodity, if for
177.
by motoxpro 2y ago
Seems fun! You choose any time to start (mutually agreed upon) You can choose any row you want. The chance (skill?) comes into play in that people can get up from those seats and new people can come in. That's why you have to choose an
178.
by motoxpro 2y ago
But then what is the benefit to them? If the don't maintain the repo (benefit from bug fixes, features, security, etc) and it's free for people to build on, how does that make them money?
179.
by motoxpro 2y ago
Ironically, the common (used to be common?) trope about foundation models being picks and shovels and LLM wrappers having no values is probably backwards. ChatGPT is the most valuable AI product and it's just a wrapper around an underl
180.
by motoxpro 2y ago
They are not supporting the decision in this comment, they are just pointing out that Elon had a positive experience with the twitter layoffs which led him to want to run that playbook again. I would even venture the guess that they DONT su

More ›