motoxpro

5 ms·

31.
by motoxpro 3mo ago
super interesting
32.
by motoxpro 4mo ago
Have you never gone to a bookstore in real life and just browsed? Not everything has to come from recommendation or reviews or research. It can just be pure exploration. Its the same process online and offline: See an interesting cover&#x2F
33.
by motoxpro 4mo ago
So in the conext you just laid out, you can apply that to this. "Artificial Intelligence Strategy for the Department of War" https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jan/12/2003855671/-1/-1/0&#x
34.
by motoxpro 4mo ago
Estimation is by definitely not final. Did you watch the demo? It’s a workflow tool. You can trivialize anything like this, salesforce is just a Postgres wrapper, doesn’t mean it’s not valuable.
35.
by motoxpro 5mo ago
Claude would RUN for longer than 30 mins building something like this. its 29 a year. At an hourly wage of $40 an hour. You would have to spend less than 45 minutes thinking about this and then NEVER touch it again for a year. No security u
36.
by motoxpro 5mo ago
The workflow/ultracode mode is absolutely unbelievable.
37.
by motoxpro 5mo ago
Interesting that humans can't be trained to improve ("be less biased") but AI can. I would say this is a much more damning conclusion for the AI replacing ICs than managers. Whats easier, training AI to make good bets (what d
38.
by motoxpro 5mo ago
Management advocates for AI because see ICs as commodities that just need to be coordinated to "do the thing." In this situation, remove the mid-managers, replace the ICs with AI, and use AI to enable them to coordinate the "
39.
by motoxpro 5mo ago
And its 28% on the noai.duckduckgo.com domain, not in total. So it's even smaller.
40.
by motoxpro 5mo ago
So you've got that market. Let's call it the demand BY knowledge workers to do the work. You've also got: 2. The companies themselves buying tokens for operations to make the work more efficent. e.g. Salesforce agent or Micro
41.
by motoxpro 5mo ago
One of the most common functions in programming is sleep(ms). There is wake, heartbeat, handshake, orphan, listen, starve, parent/child, etc. This is not anything new, its just a word that fits the function.
42.
by motoxpro 5mo ago
I just have different moral preferences. I think its morally wrong to do illegal/morally wrong/irresponsible things in general, whether I am using a hammer, a car, a company, or AI. It's worse to ask someone else to break a w
43.
by motoxpro 5mo ago
I am not arguing its RIGHT to stop supporting games. It's just a sad situation where people frame these things as moral/ethical debates when they have real world costs to players who get less games and game makers who will go out
44.
by motoxpro 5mo ago
its such a bummer that because of laws like this, less games will be made. Most games dont ever make money and dont succeed. The alternative to companies shutting games down without supporting them is not them supporting them, it is them no
45.
by motoxpro 5mo ago
People who haven’t been hacked just haven’t been looked at. If someone wants to hack you, they will hack you. It’s really unfortunate that people have this level of confidence in their ability. Here’s an example. https://hacks.mo
46.
by motoxpro 5mo ago
It just seems like you are saying if you found out Claude code was a bunch of remote working doing work for you, then it would be morally wrong to do illegal/morally wrong/irresponsible things with them, but because it is NOT a hu
47.
by motoxpro 5mo ago
at which point you realize you never had a plan written down and you are using the code as a spec
48.
by motoxpro 5mo ago
I think it's closer to asking a remote (human) assistant to do something that someone doesn't want done (e.g., view the source of a closed-source product, whether through reverse engineering, going into their office, or social eng
49.
by motoxpro 6mo ago
Men must be going through a lot of breakups and deaths! 26% have cried in the last week 39% have cried in the last month 64% have cried in the last year
50.
by motoxpro 6mo ago
I appreciate the sentiment. The point I was making in my initial reply was in response to the trivialization of what someone else cares about ("sad enough to cry over productivity software"). That to me is by definition judgmental
51.
by motoxpro 6mo ago
Becuase you're associating their reaction to "a serious medical condition" because it is "not normal." I wanted to add a counter to that and say they are very normal and support them rather than suggest they go to t
52.
by motoxpro 6mo ago
This is not good intentioned, you're a jerk, and it's 100% fine (and healthy) to care about things in life.
53.
by motoxpro 6mo ago
A better headline would be "AI finds mistakes made by human" It's not that it's doing something novel, every single person in this thread has made mistakes, and big ones, not because we aren't trying, it just happen
54.
by motoxpro 6mo ago
why would the systems go down if the models are better at the humans at finding bugs. Playing a bit of devils advocate here, but why would the models be worse at handling the complexity if you assume they will get better and better. All sof
55.
by motoxpro 6mo ago
I mean sounds like you are asking the question "What is the job of a CEO?"
56.
by motoxpro 6mo ago
Thats like saying Claude Code is targeted at coders who cant code (which I know some poeple believe)
57.
by motoxpro 6mo ago
100% agree. Photo is a much muuuch bigger market.
58.
by motoxpro 6mo ago
Then substitute another word for emotion that fit better for you, but I would much rather take into account what this article is saying (e.g. using this string of text is likely to give you hallucinations. see my example) then have producti
59.
by motoxpro 6mo ago
I think you missed some of the point. If you say "Display information A using B format" but the model doesn't know A then you will get a more negative "emotional" response (e.g. desparation "I don't know t
60.
by motoxpro 7mo ago
Why not just have a throwaway email account for these types of things. Opens up a lot of great software if this is a barrier for you.

More ›