motorest

40 ms·

451.
by motorest 1y ago
> I mean, people usually call those 'feature' when they're built-in. No, that's specious reasoning. A message queue is still a message queue if you use one provided by the OS. An exception is still an exception even i
452.
by motorest 1y ago
> You're effectively talking about an attacker breaking https aren't you? No. There are many ways to fish bearer tokens. Encryption in transit only addresses some of them.
453.
by motorest 1y ago
> Design patterns aren’t solutions to common design problems. They’re after the fact descriptions of solutions for design problems. That’s the issue. No, they are not. They describe a way to design something. They are called design patte
454.
by motorest 1y ago
> The desirable properties for tokens is that they have some means of verifying their integrity, that they are being sent by the authorized party, and that they are being consumed by the authorized recipient. Those are desirable properti
455.
by motorest 1y ago
> Fair. I assume you mean asymmetric key cryptography and not JWKs in particular? There's some degree of confusion in your comment. JWKs is a standard to represent cryptographic keys. It is an acronym for JSON Web key set. > JOSE
456.
by motorest 1y ago
> What am I missing here that makes this a better fit? From a cursory read, the answer is "it doesn't". The blogger puts up a strawman argument to complain about secret management and downloading SDKs, but the blogger ends
457.
by motorest 1y ago
> That's interesting - why do it this way rather than including a "reusable" signed JWT with the request, like an API token? Why sign the whole request? Supposedly bearer tokens should be ephemeral, which means either shor
458.
by motorest 1y ago
> We don't really have this problem in .NET 8, we mock stuff just fine using an in-memory database provider. No, you don't. At best in-memory databases represent a test double that you can use in integration tests. If you need
459.
by motorest 1y ago
> I really appreciate how this article explains why certain design patterns became a thing. Usually, it was to address some very practical problem or limitation. I don't agree at all. I feel that those who criticise design patterns
460.
by motorest 1y ago
> I've never seen anybody do that... I feel the blog post is a bunch of poorly thought through strawmen. I was browsing through the singleton example and I was wondering why would anyone use buggy code to implement something it clea
461.
by motorest 1y ago
> Great post. Now let's do C# because if I see a repository pattern doing nothing but calling Entity Framework under the hood again I'm going to rip the planet in half Your comment shows a hefty amount of ignorance. Repositorie
462.
by motorest 1y ago
> 118 pi I wonder why this features so low in the list. The default user:pass combo for Raspbian/Raspberry Pi OS is pi:raspberry https://forums.raspberrypi.com/viewtopic.php?t=151745
463.
by motorest 1y ago
> Not everyone makes websites by hand. OP literally said "I wish there was still something good that just edited HTML and CSS locally and uploaded it."
464.
by motorest 1y ago
> Being in the possession of a password or key implies having permission to use that key. No, it doesn't.
465.
by motorest 1y ago
> Wait until they remove the feature YOU rely on hundreds of times a day. So they renamed a menu entry to "Open image in new tab" from "View image". Is this what you qualify as a problem that... Forces you to switch t
466.
by motorest 1y ago
> I wouldn't call that stealing. It is a forced refund. If someone took money out of your pocket would you call it stealing? What if they gave it to someone else, like a past employer or your parents or a humanitarian organization?
467.
by motorest 1y ago
> Sure things have changed now and the internet has become more corporate, but I reckon there are still people out there doing this stuff l because they can. I recall a while back there was a story here about a recipe app that used LLMs
468.
by motorest 1y ago
> There are bots which crawl the web, not to make an index, but just to find vulnerabilities. You can download a few of them out of GitHub and run them immediately, too.
469.
by motorest 1y ago
> It was crazy just how fast it was exploited. The internet is a wild place in any aspect of it. You should try spinning up a random virtual private server on any cloud provider, plug in a public IP address,and listen to traffic. Sometim
470.
by motorest 1y ago
> I don't think I buy that. It's hard to build a nice web app without JS, but an informational website doesn't need JS to be beautiful. It's not that I disagree with the premise, but you should understand that the &qu
471.
by motorest 1y ago
> I wish there was still something good that just edited HTML and CSS locally and uploaded it. What's wrong with launching a file watcher, opening the page in a browser, and editing away with any IDE of your choice?
472.
by motorest 1y ago
> Some vibe coder saw nothing wrong with this. What do you think is wrong with the site?
473.
by motorest 1y ago
> I have plenty of arguments against Firefox, but engaging in browser holy wars is so tiresome. I think you're trying to make up irrational excuses. If you feel the need to criticise something and be vocal about it, the very least t
474.
by motorest 1y ago
> Firefox is still terrible (...) Explain in your own words why did you believe Firefox is terrible.
475.
by motorest 1y ago
> Because where there are no checks there are the cheaters. Were there any instances where people cheated in spite of testing, and were undetected for years?
476.
by motorest 1y ago
> That's why I include "massive leagues". If a city or school district is large enough to impel doping, the entire premise of sport is undermined. I don't think you understand. Some amateur athletes purposely resort t
477.
by motorest 1y ago
> Sports + capitalism is bad already (...) I love a good bashing, but are you aware doping runs rampant in amateur levels of any sport or even physical activity? Why do you presume that competitions would be different?
478.
by motorest 1y ago
> I believed him 100% about EPO but the motor stuff is silly. they check for motors for over a decade now. If it's silly then why are they trying to counter it for over a decade?
479.
by motorest 1y ago
> Have you seen that Mozilla has basically become an ad agency? Even taking these comments at face value, this blend of arguments is pretty stupid given that you're making this sort of claims about Firefox when discussing not using
480.
by motorest 1y ago
> How do you get ublock to work in chrome after the update? Why does anyone keep using Chrome if they care the slightest about privacy? You're using a browser owned by a company that sells online ads. What do you expect?

More ›