motbus3

20 ms·

451.
by motbus3 1y ago
I was wondering if my comment seemed like accusing of being of ill intent. I hope not, if it does I'm sorry about that. I just meant the way it is presented it is a long stretch to conclude B from A. I am sure it happened, but I think
452.
by motbus3 1y ago
This text reminds me much of tylervigen.com/spurious-correlation. The data presented is completely insufficient for the claim and based on cherry picked narratives. Anyone can slice and cut numbers the way they want to prove a point. T
453.
by motbus3 1y ago
You are probably right, my point is that Populism, and at least it, does need to perpetuate de problems, hence, no populist leader is/was ever effective. Not an answer but an appendix. There is common misconceptions on the definition o
454.
by motbus3 1y ago
That is true but you miss one thing. Populism depends on having problems. If people feel safe they don't need a strong hand in control. Populism creates problems or do not solve them in order to exist. That's why there is a need t
455.
by motbus3 1y ago
Look. If the government is worried with people who are already there is not because it is going to get better. This is just populism. They want you to think you need to be saved, they want to be your figurative father
456.
by motbus3 1y ago
Now with AI, cheap labour is overrated and all Those people want is for you to make a contract with openai/meta whatever or to break your business for them to take. There will be no new jobs. The BBB comes with a hidden line saying tha
457.
by motbus3 1y ago
For me it is funny to remember it differently from you because I used the www much before AOL. When I tried AOL I felt it was so closed and limited. I understood the idea but the WWW was at the same time less professional but also free. I w
458.
by motbus3 1y ago
Ironically I cannot read the article because the telegraph wants me to pay.
459.
by motbus3 1y ago
I guess all you said is correct but there is one important point. Data has being systematically being gathered and analysed to have an individual profile of your behaviour and needs without people understanding. It is not about knowing how
460.
by motbus3 1y ago
I don't agree. You can have a good life from Open source. The problem is that people assumes the money that keeps rails and whatever going is guaranteed and that no one should contribute too because it is free. Sidekiq has all the righ
461.
by motbus3 1y ago
Please read his post on his blog to take your own conclusions, but as I and many other read it his post, basically non white people are incompatible with British culture and immigrants are solely a problem and serve only purpose to foster
462.
by motbus3 1y ago
Maybe the lack of support from all other companies and people to the ruby foundation was the culprit. Sidekiq was help without obligation.
463.
by motbus3 1y ago
It is lovely overall. I just think the camera is almost too close for the character. It could be just a little tad farther so I could control it better when playing on my phone
464.
by motbus3 1y ago
Where do you assume they are not in good health? Or many of them are not in good health? Most of them are university students or economic active people as far as I know. Cutting those places will put UK in even a worse place then after Brex
465.
by motbus3 1y ago
It is happening already. Some insurance companies in my country wants to demand DNA testing and to withold that information for indeterminate time and to be able to sell that info. Thankfully, although not even close to EU data protection t
466.
by motbus3 1y ago
Thank you for the numbers. Could you please clarify how much money this translates to, both in terms of income and expenses generated by skilled workers who are legally employed in the UK? I must say I am not doubting nor being pedantic. I
467.
by motbus3 1y ago
The digital id is not the reason for that comment, or not solely. I mean having AI cameras, legalised racial profiling, attack on vessels in international waters without proof (likely killing innocent civilians too when it could be intercep
468.
by motbus3 1y ago
Maybe they plan to ask Uber and deliveroo to authenticate the workers via facial recognition?
469.
by motbus3 1y ago
I don't think it is only online. It is really a distopean future in US and UK right now. I honestly understand the problem with immigration, but at the same time, I think this way of approaching the problem is just to create "the
470.
by motbus3 1y ago
Can anyone really point me out the real problem about the immigrants? How big is it compared to, for example the lack of funding of the NHS or the hyper funding of other initiatives such as war in Ukraine. Or are those things somehow relate
471.
by motbus3 1y ago
I guess the guy above is right. It is about the data and the right to use your face and track you everywhere. This can be easily paired with that UK bonkers camera ai thing. They might not need to know who is illegal, but if the camera does
472.
by motbus3 1y ago
I'm sure you can easily find a out its creator saying he cannot make a living from brew despite putting lots of effort in it. Initial plan was to bake some sort of payment in it so companies would need to pay, then it became something
473.
by motbus3 1y ago
It would be a shame if people starting to break it
474.
by motbus3 1y ago
It is all true. I do the same. But it is not the healthy thing. C suite abuse should not be tolerated. People needs money but not at the cost of healthy. I have someone in my family heavily affected by this mentality. 25y of treatment and i
475.
by motbus3 1y ago
Omg! I was worried. I got dizzy. I looked to my feet, and there was no feet! I am trapped in a 1980s yellow tinted case! Someone help me!
476.
by motbus3 1y ago
I agree, on the other hand, financially supporting someone that you fundamentally agree with the principles is also not doable. This is all a callout for people to step in and really help open source and free software before it is too late.
477.
by motbus3 1y ago
Totally on that one. Recently investments in homebrew almost turned it to be a paid tool. I can totally see someone seizing the opportunity there. (And if you think it is a good idea, you are a terrible person) I work for a small company wh
478.
by motbus3 1y ago
You have good points but there is no way that the costs wouldn't blow the ceilings off if those measures are taken as is. I do agree that the immigration system is broken. But I do not agree that immigrants are the problem. Simply retr
479.
by motbus3 1y ago
You have an interesting take Whatsoever it is, for sure it will not solve any of the root causes of UK's problems. The lack of structured internal investment with good planning and execution is what has been causing the UK to fall beh
480.
by motbus3 1y ago
This will soon be turned into a political weapon. You do what I want or I cut your internet.

More ›