morshu9001

24 ms·

1. 721.▲
   by morshu9001 1y ago

   Or, I can focus on getting the project done. If IPv6 is a requirement then I'll do it, no complaints. Chasing nice-to-haves is how the project explodes in complexity. Which btw, is what ipv6 did. They just needed to enlarge the address
2. 722.▲
   by morshu9001 1y ago

   You do have to mess with the port forwarding etc if you're dual stack.
3. 723.▲
   by morshu9001 1y ago

   NAT is actually useful besides just avoiding address exhaustion. Many IPv6 networks are on NAT anyway, like pretty much every cell carrier, which maybe accounts for most ipv6 traffic.
4. 724.▲
   by morshu9001 1y ago

   Making v6 a separate network from v4 was a mistake in hindsight. They needed to roll this out in steps, first one being you keep the same IP address and all except you're just using v6 instead of v4, with a NAT etc like before (which o
5. 725.▲
   by morshu9001 1y ago

   There are many new projects that are ipv4-only, and it doesn't mean they failed.
6. 726.▲
   by morshu9001 1y ago

   I tried making an app once that was like RSS but with reposts, and each friend only gets to occupy one spot on your feed per day. Worked pretty nicely with my friends on it. Probably a lot of things like that exist.
7. 727.▲
   by morshu9001 1y ago

   Where I work is definitely positive-sum, but I still have to make a little noise, build connections, etc. And it's not one of those things where the situation would be better if nobody did that.