morpheos137

4 ms·

31.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
neither. An llm is a hopelessly.inefficient real time controler.
32.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
Actually the point is total cost wise outside of subsidy it is not cheaper than humans. the bigger problem is as the parent said open AI created a market. It is selling a commodity service with investor funds. There is no moat. your second
33.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
misleading title first "easily manipulated" does not equal "spontaneously generates" we have to stop thinking of LLMs as beings and think of them as interactive libraries. There are gorey books in the library too; examp
34.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
it is text generator. just like an interactive library or smaet search engine. if we dont ban books on cryptography putting this under ITAR is rather absurd. Anthying these models train on is already public or accessible information. They j
35.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
persists productively. if agent bankruots its owner or.itself.then that is not productive (who funds paper clip maximizer?) an answer that takes forever has no score and answer that is arrived at quickly and is good enough scores well. agen
36.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
persists productively. if agent bankruots its owner or.itself.then that is not productive (who funds paper clip maximizer?) an answer that takes forever has no score and answer that is arrived at quickly and is good enough scores well. agen
37.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
what evidence do you have?
38.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
show me an agent that persists productively in a goal without stopping. Does not exist. LLMs run on gradient descent. The agent is looking for the most efficient way to halt. AGI paperclip maximizer woukd likely recognize the absurdity of i
39.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
Lol good place for multiple eyes to view how limited "ai" is.
40.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
My opinion is there is a category error in the discourse on AI. It treats ai assisted output as other than human. AI is a human tool. AI output is human output.
41.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
the water cycle exists. unless data centers are being built in deserts or run off fossil aquifers the or other water constrained circumstance the waste is supurious. As other commenters have said closed loop cooling exists. Billions of moto
42.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
this assumes general intelligence as an abstract principle vs an adapation to specific constraints is even a thing. we also dont have a low level understanding of how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
43.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
Ok i honestly was not aware opinionated titles were not allowed. sorry about. Why doesnt HN autopopulate the title in that case? Given this is a discusion site I lead with my point of view. Obviously the content behind the link is unchanged
44.
Anthropic being a good citizen or pushing ideology?(anthropic.com)
2 points by morpheos137 4mo ago|7 comments
45.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
No serious mathematical model that I am aware of has been made as to how LLMs have the potential to grow exponentially in intelligence or has any one show how the application of open source based knowledge (i.e. the training corpus) is a n
46.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
if life didn't suck and there were not the time out of death there would be no drive to optimize the time we have.
47.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
I wonder if this would qualify as illegal anticompetitive behavior?
48.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
I made an encrypted static site framework: https://github.com/4pito3pito2pi/unveil-static-site/
49.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
what if superintelligence is a myth? There is no mathematical reason why it should exist. The exploitablity of the environment is finite. Humans seek utility not intelligence as it own end. It is entirely possible we have overinvested in co
50.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
Nobody owes me anything. Absolutely agree. I more read than contribute. Making an observation is not asserting an entitlement. I am only asseying it seems in the past the forum was more dynamic.
51.
HN seems dead compared to say 10-15 years ago
43 points by morpheos137 4mo ago|45 comments
52.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
shadowy cabal, no but nice strawman, instead billions of people with divergent interests who rationally optimize for indivual utility instead of truth. Nothing significant is unsolved in physics. That's why bullshit tech religions are
53.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
The point one must recognize is imperfection and pet theories are what drives the research. a full theory of cognition would not require billions to store once known. People seek rents so they have an interest in maintaining mysteries and c
54.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
Second statement: same reason mathematicians and other knowledge professionals fret about LLMs. When your niche is something you know that others don't commoditization is a threat. If someone can distill insights chances are others can
55.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
Yes Deepseek V4 is as good or better than western sota models in my experience for practical coding given an appropriate harness. cost per solution is certainly cheaper.
56.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
the funny thing to me is money and wisdom are somewhat inversely corellated. thus the "core algorithm" is knowable but almost nobody would want to know it because then there is not mystery to rent seek from. The cost of discovery
57.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
I don't mean to piss on your parade but llm generation is human output just like a car welded by robots is a human product. This contrived dualism between llm generated things and human generated things makes the llm into an independen
58.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
Seems to me that state sponsorship of ai platforms would violate separation of church and state given looney transhumanist ai fanfic is entirely unsupported by empiricism or mathematics. Again can anybody name an economcially useful technol
59.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
Is this a joke? Again what technology has an llm autonomously developed?
60.
by morpheos137 4mo ago
this would.be a long term disaster for the us economy. you would have an unproductive or deflationay technology subsidized by the federal goverment. if ai raises productivity then it will be deflationary (making nominal gdp shrink). if ai d

More ›