morelisp

34 ms·

481.
by morelisp 3y ago
I'm sure there's literally any overlap at all between that and this.
482.
by morelisp 3y ago
You don't need to change the license to the software, only the license to access the bug tracker.
483.
by morelisp 3y ago
Is the specific person important to the point? Edit to replies: Both the context and the employer were in the original post. Blasting the actual GitHub issue when it's clear the author specifically tried to avoid that is awful behavi
484.
by morelisp 3y ago
I'm not surprised it happened, but I am surprised at the @us.ibm.com sender address.
485.
by morelisp 3y ago
In Germany it depends on how you look at it, at the more conservative / "traditional" companies (which is still a lot of them, including almost everything I hear about outside Berlin/Hamburg) programmers without degrees
486.
by morelisp 3y ago
> Switzerland is No. 1 Time to rename the region CHAD I guess.
487.
by morelisp 3y ago
I find that if you are seeking lots of consumers around large topics no amount of RAM is really sufficient, and if you are mostly sticking to the tails like a regular Kafka user, even 64GB is usually way more than enough. CPU isn't usu
488.
by morelisp 3y ago
I don't know if this is the only reason, but mass storage devices seem to have a ludicrously unacceptably high failure rate and short lifetime to be something I key large potions of my life to.
489.
by morelisp 3y ago
Kafka is also a system that can make pretty good general use of more CPUs and more storage, but doesn't have much need for RAM. Tying the CPU and RAM together whether by CPU model or cloud vendor offerings is annoying if you're tr
490.
by morelisp 3y ago
https://aws.amazon.com/msk/pricing/ prices scale linearly with CPU beginning with m5.large, and I wouldn't really want to run a production Kafka on anything less than m5.xlarge. (They do at least keep linearl
491.
by morelisp 3y ago
The kind of server you'd run Kafka on tends to already be pretty far up the curve. I don't think I can get 10x our default broker for 20x the cost. Maybe 100x the cost. (I could probably get 2x it for 2x the cost but once you valu
492.
by morelisp 3y ago
Cute, but over years of explaining it I think any explanation of Kafka that presents it as a queue is bound to leave the reader with more misaligned expectations than when they started (while also making them think they learned something, w
493.
by morelisp 3y ago
Depending on the function you may even be able to use "two for one" hashing, splitting e.g. a single 64 bit hash into two different 32 bit ones and combine those. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.08654
494.
by morelisp 3y ago
Any medicine that is disproportionately represented in our post hunter-gatherer treatment plans, especially synthesized chemicals, must have an element of "bad for you" in it. Drink clean water and boil willow bark and don't
495.
by morelisp 3y ago
The mass of men serve the state thus, not as men mainly, but as machines, with their bodies. They are the standing army, and the militia, jailors, constables, possee comitatus, etc. In most cases there is no free exercise whatever of the j
496.
by morelisp 3y ago
> it would be really hard to do anything that is fully, end to end, open source. We've developed the code on Macs, hosted the code on GitHub, written plugins for Obsidian and GitHub, hosted the website on AWS. Yeah, nobody did open
497.
by morelisp 3y ago
Given how many people made the same reading (even to the point of the same joke), I'd argue they're arbitrary rules applied largely consistently , except when some marketing droid shows up.
498.
by morelisp 3y ago
Be serious.
499.
by morelisp 3y ago
> I don't understand the presumption that the AI should be open source here. Because it literally says "open-source AI".
500.
by morelisp 3y ago
> I am also very against going for people's job for something they said in their personal capacity... I say if you prioritize the ability to say shit on twitter over your job, then it's not a question of free speech, it's
501.
by morelisp 3y ago
Inventing an entire pseudoscientific field and then being mad no one wants to engage your arguments is ultimate "debate me" poster behavior.
502.
by morelisp 3y ago
I said someone claiming to be a pony, not someone assigned pony by rando.
503.
by morelisp 3y ago
I don't know about that, the smartest man in the world can't seem to stop posting while multiple distinct sets of complete idiots have managed to take over Afghanistan in the past two decades.
504.
by morelisp 3y ago
I don't think anyone is debating VMWare's legal right to fire her, just the wisdom of such a decision. If I was a big tech company especially one trying to find people interested in working lower down the stack, I wouldn't go
505.
by morelisp 3y ago
There's even a middle ground where we don't have to agree with everything our employer does but also they don't get all whiny when we tweet about it.
506.
by morelisp 3y ago
There is also nobody claiming to be a pony. If you're a trans woman you shouldn't be baited so easily. I assure you they would keep "hate criming" you no matter how many cartoons you like.
507.
by morelisp 3y ago
VMWare wants your authentic self to work, unless of course your "authentic self" has opinions. (Anyone thinking this about "the pony" is missing the point, probably disingenuously so.)
508.
by morelisp 3y ago
Neither is not bombing civilians, yet here we are.
509.
by morelisp 3y ago
Your critique only makes sense if she's working for the DoD, or negotiating those contracts for VMWare, or VMWare's business is significantly DoD contracts, none of which are true.
510.
by morelisp 3y ago
> VMware is committed to harnessing the power of human difference by enabling a workplace where we can all be proud to be our authentic selves.

More ›