moralestapia

705 ms·

3511.
by moralestapia 4y ago
Process isolation (security) belongs to the OS so there's nothing stopping one from doing the same, also, it shouldn't be much difficult to implement.
3512.
by moralestapia 4y ago
Sure, and most of them have been addressed properly. Honestly (as another commenter said), V8 being behind one of Google's largest revenue streams makes it feel "safe enough" for me, they have all the resources and incentive
3513.
by moralestapia 4y ago
I know V8 from back to front and I feel that it is quite safe, after all, there's not much you can do with a javascript interpreter ... Regarding the CVEs mentioned, the overwhelming majority of them have a "denial of service&quot
3514.
by moralestapia 4y ago
I DO think it's a great setup, this kind of thing obliterates nepotism and favors meritocracy, that's a win on my book!
3515.
by moralestapia 4y ago
Huh? But we DO have the data for "groups of drivers who don't use these systems" ...
3516.
by moralestapia 4y ago
Sure, but is there a reason to assume (mere speculation allowed) that Tesla's software is being used more than GM's?
3517.
by moralestapia 4y ago
1 ms < 30 seconds, so that data is there as well. Also, >I'm no Tesla fan, but ... Sounds like he's vouching for them. Anyway, the argument is not against @bradfa, it is about whether AP makes driving safer or not.
3518.
by moralestapia 4y ago
It's not disingenuous, The whole point is "my new system reduces crashes", if it doesn't, in the bottom line, then it doesn't.
3519.
by moralestapia 4y ago
Like in "I sell software for franchisors/franchisees"? or like in "I sell this IT thing through partners who behave like franchisees"?
3520.
by moralestapia 4y ago
Imagine someone records you answering lots of interesting questions, stating that you're conscious, solving a couple problems, saying that you don't want to die, etc... Is the recording a sentient being? I think a similar thing is
3521.
by moralestapia 4y ago
Yup, that's true. Let's see.
3522.
by moralestapia 4y ago
99% of everything is speculation at best, even this site is pretty much (high value) speculation as a service. The NHTSA has a reputation of not f*king around so I would definitely side with @dangrossman on this thing. As of today, Autopilo
3523.
by moralestapia 4y ago
1. The article omits </p> liberally. 2. The spec details situations where the </p> tag may be omitted. 3. None of these (2) apply to what's going on at (1).
3524.
by moralestapia 4y ago
Read the quoted sentence again (from the source you brought here), none of those clauses apply to: <p> Block of text ... Which is what they do in the article.
3525.
by moralestapia 4y ago
>A p element's end tag may be omitted if the p element is immediately followed by an address, article, aside, blockquote, details, div, dl, fieldset, figcaption, figure, footer, form, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, header, hgroup, hr, main
3526.
by moralestapia 4y ago
This kind of intellectual theft is extremely common in academia, particularly between <an immigrant from a different country> vs. <someone who is a national wherever this happens>. Recommended movie, Dark Matter [1]. 1: https:&
3527.
by moralestapia 4y ago
>That’s a big opportunity for scammers. People who are unable to discern scam from not scam get scammed. Queue ESG in the current time. I own a startup in that space, we are not scammers (source: trust me, bro) but the amount of charlata
3528.
by moralestapia 4y ago
So you're telling me Do Kwon was a scammer?! Wow, no one would've thought of that! What's even more absurd is that in a couple years from now it will do a similar thing again, and people will give him its money ... again.
3529.
by moralestapia 4y ago
He can't just back out of the deal (according to analysts like Levine).
3530.
by moralestapia 4y ago
You're right, Although I didn't mean it as an attack it def. didn't add to the discussion, so I'll be more careful onwards.
3531.
by moralestapia 4y ago
Usually these things clear up until there's litigation involved.
3532.
by moralestapia 4y ago
Nice comment, you opened a new perspective on this. >But what if you actually do want your dependency list to trigger invalidation? I (we, as it was a team) once had a scenario where there was a big dependency graph with a lot of replica
3533.
by moralestapia 4y ago
Caches, clients, Facebooks, hosts, Metas, Redises(?), ... all those things don't really matter. What matters is B* reads from A, but how often should that be? That's it, literally. That's the whole problem.
3534.
by moralestapia 4y ago
>Are you claiming cache invalidation is simple in that case? No. >I believe it's a solved problem It's not. Suppose you have source-of-truth A (doesn't really matter if it's a key-value store or whatever, it could
3535.
by moralestapia 4y ago
No, mine was not a question, it was a statement. You misnamed the problem you are trying to solve.
3536.
by moralestapia 4y ago
??? We seem to have different concepts with regards to the cache invalidation problem. The one I know has to do with "Is there a change in the source data? How should I check this? How often?" and such things. Yours seems to be &q
3537.
by moralestapia 4y ago
Proof that something was there at some time in the past + proof that the contents haven't been tampered with.
3538.
by moralestapia 4y ago
Nah, Long way for that, you'd have to (at least): * Prove the report contains false info * Prove it happened on purpose AND with an intent to commit fraud * Prove it affects the transaction in a substantial way * Prove this is enough t
3539.
by moralestapia 4y ago
It comes down to not being able to state that he was unaware of a bot problem (as an argument for walking out of the deal) if he has very publicly said that he's doing this because of and to fix the bot problem.
3540.
by moralestapia 4y ago
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jB0vBmiTr6o

More ›