Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
monooso
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
121.
▲
by
monooso
6mo ago
> This is the dumbest, most pointless military conflict in American history. You've picked a high bar there.
122.
▲
by
monooso
6mo ago
Genuine question: is Fox News a credible, unbiased source for these figures in particular?
123.
▲
by
monooso
6mo ago
I believe the phrase you're reaching for is "carrying out extra-judicial executions of civilians alleged to have been smuggling drugs."
124.
▲
by
monooso
6mo ago
My clients love non-deterministic invoices.
125.
▲
by
monooso
6mo ago
I believe capitalism is defined by private ownership (not necessarily by investors) of the means of production.
126.
▲
by
monooso
6mo ago
If you don't use any AI assistance when coding I suspect you're already in the minority. If you refuse to use software that was built with any AI assistance, well... good luck finding an operating system to run.
127.
▲
by
monooso
6mo ago
Dumb Starbucks begs to differ. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dumb_Starbucks
128.
▲
by
monooso
6mo ago
Paul Kinlan published a blog post a couple of days ago [1] with some interesting data, that show output tokens only account for 4% of token usage. It's a pretty wide-reaching article, so here's the relevant quote (emphasis mine):
129.
▲
by
monooso
6mo ago
A documented breaking change does not mean the application is unstable. The Neovim developers have been extremely clear that part of the process of getting to 1.0 is finalising the API, and that there will be breaking changes en-route.
130.
▲
by
monooso
6mo ago
I've found Neovim to be remarkably stable, even when building from main.
131.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
I would argue that ambiguity and uncertainty slow down reading, and more importantly comprehension , far more than a few additional characters.
132.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
> I have no intention at all of hosting anything I've made by hand, be it code, photos, recipes, etc. Do you publish any such items on platforms you don't own (you specifically said you "have no intention of... hosting any
133.
▲
"Lab Leak: The True Origins of Covid-19" from Whitehouse.gov
(whitehouse.gov)
4 points
by
monooso
7mo ago
|
1 comments
134.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
Two decades. Rails was released in 2004, IIRC.
135.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
I appear to be in the minority here. Perhaps because I've been practicing TDD for decades, this reads like the blog equivalent of "water is wet."
136.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
"Welcomes" seems like a stretch.
137.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
I view it as a collection of potentially helpful tips which have worked well for the author, which is exactly how it's presented. There's no suggestion that this is The Only Blessed Way.
138.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
If you must "choose to enable" encryption, that implies it's off by default. If so, GP's statement is accurate.
139.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
I'm confused. Are you criticising the article, or simply expressing concern for what may happen? The context suggests the former, but your criticisms bear no relation to the linked content. If anything, your edict to "write tests
140.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
Thank heavens for that separation of powers, otherwise the President would be declaring wars and levying tariffs willy-nilly, without even bothering to check with Congress first.
141.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
I assume the reasoning is if they're so capable, why would they need to steal secrets and technology? I use "reasoning" in the broadest possible sense.
142.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
A source for your claim would be helpful. Here's an alternative take, with source: > In Q2 2025, the number of attacks involving malware, adware, and unwanted software decreased compared to Q1. https://securelist.com/
143.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
A Samsung phone. I've owned several (not Samsung) Android phones, and have never had to deal with such nonsense.
144.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
It's interesting to contrast this take with the opinions expressed on an earlier thread about OpenAI's moat (or lack thereof). Several people pointed to Google Search as an example of "user count as moat", and an explana
145.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
I agree with your assessment, but given the past behaviour of this administration I wouldn't be shocked to discover that the real reason is "petulance".
146.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
It's almost like the democratically elected Congress gets to decide the name, not the President! (Spoiler: it's still legally called the Gulf of America)
147.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
I responded to another comment in this thread with the details, but in summary, no. See this previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46708678
148.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
This is false. Kagi had a post discussing this which made the front page of HN about a month ago [1]: > Google does not offer a public search API. The only available path is an ad-syndication bundle with no changes to result presentation
149.
▲
by
monooso
7mo ago
Not GP, and not saying I agree with them, but it may be worth remembering that Netscape had 90% market share at one point. Active user count may not be the moat you imagine.
150.
▲
by
monooso
8mo ago
As do humans, who produced all of the work on which AI was trained. If an AI favours a particular sentence structure or turn of phrase, it's probably because humans favour it.
More ›