Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
monokh
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
They do often supply some coins to themselves to create the illusion that there is activity.
62.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
That explorer probably does not count unconfirmed transactions.
63.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
Some reports that this was related to compromised OAuth tokens. How would someone know and what is the source of the compromise? A third party app that all of these accounts use?
64.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
This must be a twitter exploit. Just too many high profile accounts have been pushing out scams at the same time.
65.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
Feels more like a twitter exploit. Just about every prominent crypto account is pushing this scam out.
66.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
Run git on a personal server[1]? It's not as complicated as you might think. Probably much more usable to setup gitlab. Then set up the alternative remote on your repos. [1] https://www.linux.com/training-tutorials/
67.
▲
SEC Charges App Developer for Unregistered Security-Based Swap Transactions
(sec.gov)
2 points
by
monokh
6y ago
|
0 comments
68.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
Good point, I had taken the mechanism for granted. So the scenario is that miners drop off at a pace where you don't reach the next adjustment? Taking that into account, the "mining death spiral" theory doesn't seem too
69.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
The adjustment happens every 2 weeks. It's unlikely that miners would go offline simultaneously across the globe to the extent that it would completely grind the network to a halt.
70.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
2 powered raspberry pis and a moderately functioning internet is the answer. The network adjusts it's requirement for power based on the total power thrown at it. This is called "difficulty adjustment". Beyond total world col
71.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
"The path to decentralisation" for these projects are usually very primitive and don't actually arrive at the broad claims. Too often it's just putting wall paper over the hole in the wall. A DAO it self doesn't bri
72.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
> These can't happen on Bitcoin but they already exist on Ethereum and DeFi. All possible in a trustless way. In reality, just about every DeFi platform is not trustless nor are the usecases possible in a trustless way. Uniswap is o
73.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
Twitter is already way ahead of curve[1] > Dummy value => Placeholder value, sample value Any clues on who this terminology is excluding exactly? [1] https://twitter.com/TwitterEng/status/12787333051
74.
▲
Bitcoin from Scratch – Part 2 – The Node
(monokh.com)
3 points
by
monokh
6y ago
|
0 comments
75.
▲
Brave Browser Fork Makes a Bold Move Citing Legal Pressure
(cointelegraph.com)
1 points
by
monokh
6y ago
|
0 comments
76.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
> Of course, there will be some extra requests from bots, but having such statistics is better than nothing. I think this is a bit understated. A simple number coming off the image requests is going to be very unreliable. On average, you
77.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
I've also been keeping an eye on Braver. There was an initial flurry of work that seemed to have gotten it to a decent point but no activity since.
78.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
Thanks, that was a mistake. I've corrected it.
79.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
It also: - Acts as the primary mechanism to make the data in the chain immutable, as the cumulation of the work (chain of valid blocks) becomes harder and harder to reproduce. - Anti spam, i.e. you need to put something at stake (electricit
80.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
This is great. I especially like that it follows the protocol's implementation for the most part. i.e. you still have utxos and script verification even if it doesn't actually support the array of script op codes. There is a fully
81.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
(author here) I'd love to know the inaccuracies so I can address it. Generally I tried to simplify things to make it easy to follow in code. Anything worth noting can be added and I've done this with some things brought up in this
82.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
The article mentions the hash is required to begin with a certain number of 0s in hex digits (half byte) whereas the Bitcoin whitepaper refers to it as number of bits. I'm unsure about the comparison (== or >) but the whitepaper see
83.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
(author here) Absolutely. Thanks for pointing this out. If difficulty adjusted in factors of two, the ability of the network to accurately maintain its 10 mins blocktime become impaired. I try to keep these concepts rather simplified to eas
84.
▲
Bitcoin From Scratch – Part 1
(monokh.com)
293 points
by
monokh
6y ago
|
69 comments
85.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
I'm not sure it's accurate to say that doing open source gives you "complete freedom". In some way, you are responsible to your contributors / users and they are kind of paying your bills.
86.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
It's probably worth noting the horrible privacy characteristics of Ethereum. With the right resources, It's straightforward to track down the identity behind the seeders.
87.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
And the result is?
88.
▲
I checked over 1T mnemonics in 30 hours to win a Bitcoin
(medium.com)
2 points
by
monokh
6y ago
|
0 comments
89.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
The consequence of playing in a walled garden. Is there still no way to release an iPhone app out with the iOS app store?
90.
▲
by
monokh
6y ago
Zoom can either a) Keep their moral code and be happy in the idea that they will probably be cut off from that market (China) or b) Drop their morals, appease to the local laws as unjust as they may be in the hope that their business there
More ›