monocasa

6 ms·

121.
by monocasa 3mo ago
Itanium had all sorts of specialized machinery so that you could issue a load that's required in the future, and then keep chugging away at the instruction stream, similar to what an OoO processor does with it's reordering logic.
122.
by monocasa 3mo ago
All the more reason to treat it as a commoditize your complement situation.
123.
by monocasa 3mo ago
There's also at least the galactic orbit. There might be a very large scale orbit as well around the Great Attractor, but the jury's still bery much out on that one.
124.
by monocasa 3mo ago
Anthropic isn't a hyperscaler, but instead a hyperscaler customer. And I've seen first hand hyperscalers go to extremely large lengths to eradicate any use of Oracle (which mainly comes in these days through their acquisitions).
125.
by monocasa 3mo ago
I think the hyperscalers are smart enough to not let Oracle be their landlord.
126.
by monocasa 3mo ago
Yeah, LVGL is probably what you'd want in that environment.
127.
by monocasa 3mo ago
On x86, basically whatever XSAVE writes out. FWIW, I wouldn't be surprised if you only have a couple threads using this at a time max since it looks an awful lot Apple's AMX/SME stuff. Those Apple execution units only have s
128.
by monocasa 3mo ago
Early utilities tend to not be built on standards. See how early electric utilities within a country or even a city couldn't agree on voltage, frequency, phase, or even AC vs DC.
129.
by monocasa 3mo ago
Most utilities are monopolies.
130.
by monocasa 3mo ago
AWS is essentially a utility and gets way better than 3%.
131.
by monocasa 3mo ago
Microsoft never shipped Alpha support for win2k in the release builds, but only the betas and release candidates, so I doubt anyone ran it in "production".
132.
by monocasa 3mo ago
If the cost to orbit does get low enough as is the assumption in this article, I would be shocked if we didn't start to see amateur space based telescopes.
133.
by monocasa 4mo ago
They're talking about Doom, not Dune.
134.
by monocasa 4mo ago
You're calling it CoWoS, but also said "this shift eliminates the need for silicon interposers", but also said "CoWoS uses a passive silicon interposer" Something's got to give here. I think it's your ori
135.
by monocasa 4mo ago
> So make the union for-profit instead? In other words the distinction isn't corporations vs unions, it's for-profit vs non-profit. This seems.. okay? What's the alternative, that organizations can get tax breaks and do wh
136.
by monocasa 4mo ago
> Doesn't that apply to corporations as well? If you click on a random company[1], you see a notice that says No. For profit corporations can donate to PACs that are directly in support of a candidate rather than a broad swath of p
137.
by monocasa 4mo ago
Weaving was very much women's work. There are some exceptions that prove the rule, but society's labor expectations were extremely delineated along gender boundaries for adults in the middle ages. There's so many linguistic
138.
by monocasa 4mo ago
> ??? It's complex, but those are not donations to a candidate, even more so than the normal PAC and Super PAC song and dance. You have to give up your non profit status to donate more directly to a candidates campaign. > Seems
139.
by monocasa 4mo ago
They already have. Unions generally can't donate to political campaigns, and can't do things like strike in solidarity with other unions which would be pretty clearly be speech if we're counting corporate donations to politi
140.
by monocasa 4mo ago
The point is that the data we have is on men's work. No one said that women were bored SAHM hobbies. Just that pointing out extra tasks that need to be done in addition to the record we have of men working 150 days a year doesn'
141.
by monocasa 4mo ago
> It's still work. It doesn't magically have zero value because it was done by women. The methodology cited by the book counts only counts hours worked if it's farming or wage employment, but doesn't count any househo
142.
by monocasa 4mo ago
The students and researchers weren't the customers, but instead the large institutions they belong to. In a sense, they should be the same from this context, but the amount of consolidation that has occurred in the academic publishing
143.
by monocasa 4mo ago
Except that kind of work would have been split up by gender. The etymology of "woman" is literally "weaving person", and those kinds of tasks were up to the mostly adult women who also wouldn't have been working in
144.
by monocasa 4mo ago
As your article states, they're already using CoWoS; that's not a new technology for Apple to adopt. Also, InFO-oS is a CoWoS technique.
145.
by monocasa 4mo ago
https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/users/rauch/worktime/hours_...
146.
by monocasa 4mo ago
Ok, part of my confusion was that it was being presented in contrast to InFO-oS and InFO-PoP, but it appears to mostly be a modified version of InFO-PoP called InFO-M? Because Apple has been using InFO-PoP for almost a decade at this point
147.
by monocasa 4mo ago
Do we have any explanations of what WLCM means that are more industry focused? I couldn't find anything that didn't look like blogspam. And that explanation of the DRAM being on the same wafer doesn't really make sense. Fo
148.
by monocasa 4mo ago
I mean, patreon seems to work that way if my YouTube feed is to be believed
149.
by monocasa 4mo ago
Fun fact: operating systems were originally programs intended to replace most of the work of a human job description, that of computer operator.
150.
by monocasa 4mo ago
I bet it's just running llvm-pipe to render in software.

More ›