monocasa

23 ms·

481.
by monocasa 1y ago
Oh, I like that. You should be able to build up a nice capability model to get access to those memfds from daemon too rather than having to spawn out of a process manager if that model fits your use case a bit better.
482.
by monocasa 1y ago
Sure. But practically the amount you leak is infinitesimal. For a lot of applications that's the right call given the rest of the posix semantics you're constrained to and the kinds and frequency of data you pass via env vars.
483.
by monocasa 1y ago
In service to the pun, there is a relatively famous demo of using erlang for embedded development where they show off hot code reloading of a drone's flight software while it's in flight. https://www.youtube.com/wa
484.
by monocasa 1y ago
> Roslin: It tells people things like where the restroom is, and- > Adama: It's an integrated computer network, and I will not have it aboard this ship. > Roslin: I heard you're one of those people. You're actually a
485.
by monocasa 1y ago
I also don't believe they install OTA updates while in flight.
486.
by monocasa 1y ago
But my read is that the electron application is out of the docker container. It's distributed as an appimage. So then what is the docker container doing?
487.
by monocasa 1y ago
Why do they need a docker container and a vm?
488.
by monocasa 1y ago
Counter example: my windows 10 machine can't play my copy of crysis, but my Ubuntu machine can under wine.
489.
by monocasa 1y ago
Except WSL doesn't actually use any of the nt subsystem machinery in either of its incarnations. And also, it doesn't really follow that nomenclature. Those all follow "user code target" Subsystem. Windows Subsystem, O
490.
by monocasa 1y ago
And they also value for the size of the set to not be bounded, and for those operations to occur without allocation.
491.
by monocasa 1y ago
Trump turns on his friends the moment it's convenient to do so.
492.
by monocasa 1y ago
> It would be a destruction of the nation of Israel as the people of Israel see it. Just like the people in my home states of Georgia, Florida, and Tennessee thought that ending Jim Crow would destroy them. They were wrong, just as the
493.
by monocasa 1y ago
That's absurd. It would be a major change, but hardly in the way that could be described as the destruction of the state. Abolishing Jim Crow in the south hardly destroyed the south, despite the gloom and doom of the racists of the ti
494.
by monocasa 1y ago
Gaza at the time had farms as well as a small fishing industry, and thus needed fewer imports to feed the population.
495.
by monocasa 1y ago
I am not. Before the war Gaza had the ability to produce much of its own food. To subsist totally on imports, about 500 trucks a day is what's needed.
496.
by monocasa 1y ago
One piece I would find interesting to see data on, but don't really know how to get meaningful information on against modern, non-academic cores is the fact that reorder buffers I've seen aren't just arrays of single instruct
497.
by monocasa 1y ago
Being against Israel's status as an ethnostate is hardly "anti-state".
498.
by monocasa 1y ago
Who is in Gaza right now selling arms?
499.
by monocasa 1y ago
The requirement is about five hundred trucks per day of food (so each truck feeding about four thousand people). The fact that on rare occasions they'd let in about half that isn't really a point in your favor.
500.
by monocasa 1y ago
Hadash is not an anti-state party. For instance it explicitly supports a two state solution.
501.
by monocasa 1y ago
To be fair, Israel has had a complete naval blockade of Gaza for some 20 years, and is probably the more effective part of their blockade.
502.
by monocasa 1y ago
The explosives are the part that obviously should be given the main focus. And quite a bit of what's being talked about wrt to re-manufacturing Israeli unexploded ordance was stockpiled prior to Oct 7th. Israel did not start bombing G
503.
by monocasa 1y ago
There has been smuggling of course, but (perhaps unintentionally) Israel gives them most of what they use. > But recent intelligence has shown the extent to which Hamas has been able to build many of its rockets and anti-tank weaponry ou
504.
by monocasa 1y ago
Because Netanyahu is already saying he wouldn't comply with the deal that he's already agreed to, and isn't treating it as a peace deal. > While Netanyahu agreed to the plan on Monday, he already appears to be pushing back
505.
by monocasa 1y ago
20 years of economic warfare where all exports were banned as a mechanism for destroying their economy being a primary reason. https://web.archive.org/web/20100612001046/http://www.mcclat...
506.
by monocasa 1y ago
It is both. That being said Egypt being complicit doesn't make any of this better.
507.
by monocasa 1y ago
And even before then, Egypt's peace with Israel (and Egypt's subsequent ~$1B/yr in defense aid from the US) depends on playing nice with Israel in several respects, including deferring to Israeli policy on the Gaza border.
508.
by monocasa 1y ago
> Most editors seem to agree that Al Jazeera English and especially Al Jazeera Arabic are biased sources on the Arab–Israeli conflict and on topics for which the Qatari government has a conflict of interest. > Al Jazeera's live b
509.
by monocasa 1y ago
> We don't know much many of the interceptions Hamas was behind, but that isn't really important. Sure it is when Israel is funding other groups that are known for stealing aid. It changes the entire narrative. Israel backs an
510.
by monocasa 1y ago
Would reporting from the NYT citing Israeli military officials saying that this didn't happen on any notable scale help convince people? No Proof Hamas Routinely Stole U.N. Aid, Israeli Military Officials Say https://www.nyt

More ›