Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
monocasa
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
421.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
Modern cores can have more sram for branch prediction than they do for L1I$.
422.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
To be fair, on the x86 side those branch prediction hint prefixes have been functionally ignored by pretty much all cores for about two decades.
423.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
I mean, original Dartmouth BASIC only had if and goto, and was definitely designed as a human readable language.
424.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
How far did you get, and what do you mean "regardless of cost"? The big issue is going to be getting the vehicle to pass FMVSS, and it looks like no one has successfully done it. Have you talked to an RI to see if they know why?
425.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
Unfortunately Rivian somehow has even worse reliability than Tesla. And you can buy a BYD in America. There's just a pre-Trump 100% tariff on Chinese EVs with bipartisan support that isn't going away any time soon.
426.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
I'm not saying it doesn't work; I'm asking what special sauce they've added to make it work, and noting that despite the replies I've gotten, foveated streaming doesn't help latency, and in fact makes the effec
427.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
Enough bandwidth to absolve any latency issues over a wireless connection is not really a thing for a low latency use case like foveated rendering. What do you do when another device on the main wifi network decides to eat 50ms of time in t
428.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
It's not exactly what I'd call a rounding error, but it's manageable. But yeah, tube computing in general is an exercise in building a really fancy space heater. I'm trying to keep my tube computer I'm building dow
429.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
Foveated rendering very clearly works well with a dedicated connection, wiht predictable latency. My question was more about the latency spikes inherent in a ISM general use band combined with foveated rendering, which would make the effec
430.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
> Note that between each stage there's a capacitor in the signal path. That's to block DC. If you want an amp that amplifies DC, each stage has to run at a higher voltage than the previous stage. The plate must be above the gri
431.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
The thing is that I'd expect foveated rendering to increase latency issues, not help them like it does for bandwidth concerns. During a lag spike you're now looking at an extremely down sampled image instead of what in non foveat
432.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
Yeah, nesting JITs was kind of always an Achilles heel of this kind of architecture. IIRC, they had a research project to look at shipping a custom JVM that compiled straight to their internal ISA to skip the impedance mismatch between two
433.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
More of an issue when your phone's wifi or your partner watching a show while you game is eating into that one channel in bursts, particularly since the dedicated fob means that it's essentially another network conflicting with th
434.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
Even 5.8Ghz is getting congested. There's a dedicated router in this case (a USB fob), but you still have to share spectrum with the other devices. And at the 160Mhz symbol rate mode on WiFi6, you only have one channel in the 5.8GHz
435.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
Foveated streaming is wild to me. Saccades are commonly as low as 20-30ms when reading text, so guaranteeing that latency over 2.4Ghz seems Sisyphean. I wonder if they have an ML model doing partial upscaling until the eyetracking state is
436.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
A lot of devices that you commonly plug and unplug like flash drives and passkeys still make sense as USB-A for a lot of people because of the specifics of the USB spec. C to A converters for devices are technically verboten since they woul
437.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
Skewed execution are just different traces. Basic blocks don't have a requirement that they don't partially overlap with other basic blocks. You want that anyway for optimization reasons even without skewed execution. Self modif
438.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
I mean, if you're a storage business, hopefully you've designed your architecture such that you assume drives will go bad, so you characterize the models of drive to make sure that not all the copies are on one manufacturer, and t
439.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
He was also one of the world leaders at the time of people who understood x86 privileged space like the back of their hand, and hadn't signed any AMD or Intel NDAs. Linux was originally designed not to be portable, but as a platform f
440.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
There's levels of microcode. It's not too uncommon for each pipeline stage or so to have their own uop formats as each stage computes what it was designed to and culls what later stages don't need. Because of this it's n
441.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
> That said, I don't know what the Transmeta CPUs did. Maybe they had a low-level instruction set that had all sorts of hacks to help the translation layer avoid the problems of branch destination translation. Fixed guest branches j
442.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
It's hard to call it decompilation as opposed to just regular compilation though.
443.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
They wanted no reform. When they were politically required to put up literally any alternative, this was absolutely their proposal.
444.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
> Right? So Republicans did not support it, or want it. It was just part of the Clinton Plan politics and negotiation. When Clinton failed, HEART totally disappeared. The ideal Republican plan was to have no healthcare reform. When face
445.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
> Good point! But HEART was just a tactical response to the Clinton plan. Never a part of the party platform, not something candidates ran on, and it disappeared as support for the Clinton plan died. When Republicans won the presidency b
446.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
It was straight up co-sponsored by very nearly a majority of Senate Republicans (18 out of 42 at the time). It's hard to say a "vast majority of R's didn't support it". Though recently Republicans have been trying
447.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
The 1993 HEART Act was very much like the ACA, built around the individual mandate to purchase private health insurance, primarily through your employer. Romneycare was massaged out of this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki&#x
448.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
You don't have to mandate anything of landlords. Public housing is a thing. There are very successful examples. And on the car side, there's plenty of very cheap new options. I can literally lease a new EV for ~$100/month.
449.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
It's easier than most people give it credit for. A lot of the complaints are from attempts to loosen the building code. There's savings of many millions on the table per refit if they manage to pass those, but they're not a
450.
▲
by
monocasa
1y ago
You can also build affordable housing directly. We powered the post war period with a huge supply of starter homes. Other countries have also directly attacked homelessness by simply building enough public housing such that anyone who want
More ›