Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
monocasa
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
331.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
Is anyone running a horizontally scaled instance jellyfin? I have a weird setup where power isn't really a concern, have a bunch of ancient blades, access to a fast uplink, and am looking to set this up for a smallish collective of abo
332.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
> With developments such as the Ferrocene-qualified compiler, Rust can now meet all the analysis requirements under DO-178C, one of the most stringent safety-critical standards worldwide.
333.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
They absolutely are.
334.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
https://blog.pictor.us/rust-is-do-178-certifiable/
335.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
> Generally speaking, a bunch of Russian silos lighting up would put us at DEFCON 1. We’re not waiting until it passes Ukraine. It we want to engage any boost-phase ABM, we’re not going to let it. (Which leads to its own issues.) I alrea
336.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
You pick people for that job that aren't that concerned with the popularity polls, and who's main value add is a willingness to turn the key when told to. Either directly or because they were previously told to follow the process
337.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
> What are you basing this on? Even back when warheads were strictly ballistic we couldn't do that. Russia's arsenal, today, contains maneuverable warheads. > Flip it around: if we committed to a first strike on Russia and C
338.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
> The only reason Ukraine joining NATO is a problem is if Putin/Russia (or someone else) wants to attack them. I mean, that's objectively not true since Libya, who attacked no one, but had a NATO bombing campaign to assist thei
339.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
> Which is indistinguishable from a Russian first strike. It's really not. Once they've launched, it's pretty clear where they're going. All NATO needs is enough time to respond, and they absolutely have that. >
340.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
> an unpopular Head of State Heads of state are generally pretty good at delegating the C&C of their nukes to people they are pretty popular with. That's orthogonal to popularity polls of the populace.
341.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
> Not quite. Actually, exactly. We're specifically talking about the arsenal of the 43rd Rocket Army of the Soviet Strategic Rocket Forces. A force not reorganized until much later to be under the Russian Federation, and the relev
342.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
Sure, but that practically looks like Russia telling NATO what it's going to do, then most of NATO sitting at DEFCON 1 and being ready to respond the instant any Russian missiles look like they're not going towards Ukraine. NATO
343.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
> Your computer is designed and built in China therefore your computer belongs to Chinese and China. Right? The previous owner was the USSR, who ceased to exist, and who Ukraine was a part of. > Maybe you should see how good the Ukrai
344.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
Sure, but I think these discussions are more enlightening when we model superpowers as rational actors within their ideological system rather than just whatever propaganda is locally convenient.
345.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
There's still a lot of information coming out, a lot of it conflicting, so that's hard to say. And frankly, the Venezuelan military is absolutely tiny and has been facing the same economic issues as the rest of the country. They
346.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
You don't leave room to escalate beyond use if nukes anymore. Russia's response to a tactical nuke would be to turn Ukraine into glass. All leaving additional escalation on the table does is make sure that you don't make go
347.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
Or, MAD means that neither a nuke launch or an invasion happen in the first place.
348.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
You don't think that Ukraine, the country that designed and built those ICBMs, and had one of the highest per capita counts of nuclear physicists could handle at least a few decades of upkeep on those nukes? And the point of nukes isn&
349.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
To be the devil's advocate, I don't think Russia foresaw a situation that had Ukraine looking to join NATO right after NATO had been used offensively for the first time ever to put its thumb on the scale of a civil war that didn&#
350.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
1) It's complex. Formally, Moscow controlled the launch codes. However Ukraine designed and built the ICBMs, and are near the top of nations with the highest nuclear physicist per capita ratio. On top of that the Soviet nuclear locko
351.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
How does the explanation without labor power dynamics explain the post-1971 decline? Electricity is cheaper inflation adjusted than it was then, and technology has certainly progressed since 1971.
352.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
It's based on 20H2, so there's software that doesn't support it like Starfield.
353.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
It looks like Germany's GDP has increased every year in recent memory except 2009 and 2020. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Germany#Data
354.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
When I say casual, I mean youtube style comments where people just post memes rather than engaging, thoughtful content for whatever niche they're in. Which is essentially noise for training data. Your interpretation of casual as stuff
355.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
There's a bunch of keys. Some are in mask rom, and would be incredibly expensive to make different per console.
356.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
Interestingly, I've heard on the grapevine that AMD PSP was originally from the hardware security in the Xbox One (ie. the third line of Xboxes), hence why it's an ARM core. And it's also another branch in the lineage that a
357.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
Just about anything it cost them was more than offset by the marketing win of 'a console so powerful, the military uses it as a supercomputer'.
358.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
The causal users (to say nothing of the the massive uptick in bot traffic) are some of the more useless data from an AI training perspective.
359.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
Google's $60m/yr is the only thing keeping them profitable. Mozilla's business model isn't really something to emulate, even if the stock market doesn't really see it that way.
360.
▲
by
monocasa
10mo ago
Co resident threads might not get any speed up here since coherency instructions are functionally operations on the L2 cache.
More ›