mola

59 ms·

751.
by mola 7y ago
Good, I believe media outlets will benefit, unless Google deliberately undermine their business model in some way. As a deterrent for others.
752.
by mola 7y ago
If you have this protection, it's like insurance. You, and everybody else, pay an insignificant amount of money and you get a much more expansive treatment incase of failure. Sure you have a choice, back the politicians that are agains
753.
by mola 7y ago
In my opinion it's not the supposedly ignoring friends part. It's the fact that replacing then non virtual world with a virtual one means that you are giving your life entirely to a commercial entity. You basically lose all freedo
754.
by mola 7y ago
A major problem with this is, that our politicians also use the same inflammatory tatics to gain power. cyber publicists also understand that being inflammatory means more clicks and interactions. So you don't need an actual "enem
755.
by mola 7y ago
But you are not really opposing his theory. The terrorists are counting on this effect. They want to trigger radicalization of the populous in their target countries. Their idea is to stir up war, because in chaos there's a potential o
756.
by mola 7y ago
Science won't help you here. Ofcourse his argument is no more than a hypothesis, but you can't really disprove it because of scale. You might find a model that shows this dynamic, but it won't be a proof, And vice versa. Beca
757.
by mola 7y ago
We should thank Obama for pushing green energy initiatives
758.
by mola 7y ago
On the other hand, these doomsayers also caused public outcry that changed a few things. We can never know if these changes are the reason doom didn't happen, or because the prospects were imaginary. Anyway, I believe that it'll b
759.
by mola 7y ago
This
760.
by mola 7y ago
These are valid points but I still think it's reasonable trade off. Yes, I believe the popups banners etc might be annoying, but all companies share this problem. And I find it hard to believe it really hurts a business with a valid p
761.
by mola 7y ago
Don't forget that it's not only about spotting a bad deal when you see it. We're not talking about a deal between two individuals. To oppose the deals, you need political power. I.e convincing the populus. These deals are bac
762.
by mola 7y ago
They operate like the mafia. Take that offer you can't refuse, then they own you. This, on a macroeconomic geopolitical level.
763.
by mola 7y ago
The European Union has decided that growth based on clandestine tracking of users, selling their PII without consent is not a legitimate growth tool. You know, like the way we outlawed violence as a "growth tool" Your other claims
764.
by mola 7y ago
what could be the reason for Google to avoid publishing the site list? There's something being hidden here..and how could they even discover this? Is not like they did basic cyber research and found the exploits
765.
by mola 7y ago
They have zero power. The US can destroy the UN in a flash. But in that instance, humanity would pay much more than extra bucks for shipping crap we don't need. A strong AND fair UN is a good deterrent for world wars. Of course, it&#x2
766.
by mola 7y ago
I dunno, Anti vaxxers are definitely going against power. (Not to mean they are correct) I think call conflating 'white saviour tourism's with this phenomena is missing the point. We live in an age where basic trust in authority h
767.
by mola 7y ago
Yeah, it's a shame. They were a really exciting company when they were about creating good products and not just about making us the product. Search was a game changer. Gmail was an amazing product compare to the incumbents at the time
768.
by mola 7y ago
It might, but most people would agree that causing cancer intentionally is immoral. So cognitive dissonance is a valid assumption.
769.
by mola 7y ago
Brilliantly deceitful. We should use correct adjectives if we are to make truth the norm again...
770.
by mola 7y ago
Then you get news sources that maximize their bias as a competitive differentiation. This is how we got MSNBC and fox news etc.
771.
by mola 7y ago
What makes you think I understand this? my comment originated from the opaque language which read more like works of satire than actual analysis. All I can tell is that the whole way this company and its investors are acting is bat shit cra
772.
by mola 7y ago
I don't understand why all analysis of the craziness that is The We Company is filled with opaque language and colorful mind bending terms. The company is a fraud, it should be explained with facts, and clear simple language. Everythin
773.
by mola 7y ago
Sounds like an enabler for a new tax
774.
by mola 7y ago
Because the amount of force use by employers against unions in very anti social countries such as corporate US is extreme, then you might get that feeling. But countries where business and unions understand that they're partners and no
775.
by mola 7y ago
It's dumb money. A bunch of irrational investors that seem to be influenced by charismatic CEOs more than by actual business models.
776.
by mola 7y ago
I don't quite understand. Which element is measuring the second. The microwave frequency or the atom ball time of travel?
777.
by mola 7y ago
I think we should stop calling these things "dark patterns" This is just plain old deception and scamming.
778.
by mola 7y ago
Yeah replace a monopoly you have a vote and moral grounds to demand changes in, with a dictator...eh.. a single board member majority ... Great idea, monarchy was so awesome!
779.
by mola 7y ago
Vat isn't paid on the ad space these companies sell to other foreign businesses.
780.
by mola 7y ago
Because these large tech companies don't pay taxes currently. The current tax laws have a huge loophole in respect to large foreign internet businesses. Now they're trying to close that loophole.

More ›