mojzu

13 ms·

121.
by mojzu 5y ago
Whilst demanding what could be compared to a participation trophy (unearned search rankings)
122.
by mojzu 5y ago
No, but by using Google you did decide they were most likely to have a good answer to your query (or that they were most convenient), and if they're not allowed to rank results because of 'fairness' that would kind of break t
123.
by mojzu 6y ago
There are a few I'm aware of: - Fear of nuclear accidents, 'not in my backyard' reactions from communities - Dealing with radioactive waste safely - Cost/time overruns building nuclear plants Although I think all of thes
124.
by mojzu 6y ago
I use recursive queries like these at work, for hierarchical accounts/groups/locations/equipment/etc. where each level can have permissions that cascade down or not. Loading the hundreds of rows into memory necessary to
125.
by mojzu 6y ago
That's definitely a concern I share, I manage a couple of work related servers that are miniscule in scale compared to social media companies, and the quantity of attempted spam/FUD/astroturfing they receive would render them
126.
by mojzu 6y ago
My understanding was the origins of section 230 were because of a couple of lawsuits that targetted ISPs for content that users posted on their services. One company moderated their content, they were found liable for libel in user content
127.
by mojzu 6y ago
Those seem like some decent mitigations, but I still have a hard time believing that wealthy corporations and people won't be able to abuse such a system for their own gain as they have done with the DMCA. And how those well meaning re
128.
by mojzu 6y ago
Yeah, based on the article Facebook reactly quite positively to the proposed laws, which isn't a good sign. I'd like to be proven wrong, and there are some parts I like, such as not allowing preinstalled/unremovable apps. But
129.
by mojzu 6y ago
I agree, I understand the concerns about the ballooning complexity of browsers. However I think overall an open app ecosystem built on the web using PWAs/wasm/other stuff, is a preferable outcome to all software having to go throu
130.
by mojzu 6y ago
Plus they seem to last a lot longer than your average android smartphone in terms of longer term performance/updates. I'm holding out a (faint) hope that they'll make at least one generation with USBC before going port-less a
131.
by mojzu 6y ago
For programming I keep meaning to get around to testing code server. It would require using another computer or server to actually run it, but since vscode is essentially a browser app anyway I think there’s a decent chance it might be usab
132.
by mojzu 6y ago
You can use pgTAP for postgres unit testing, with docker you can make the process pretty fast too. Id highly recommend looking into the features/extensions of postgres, there's a lot of great stuff that goes beyond just being a da
133.
by mojzu 6y ago
That is impressive, makes me wonder whether there's a potential future where Apple puts chips like these into servers to run existing software faster/on lower power
134.
by mojzu 6y ago
I reckon it's worth waiting a few months for longer term testing, and probably a little bit longer for software support to catch up. There's also a decent chance that M2 chips are somewhere on the horizon and those might help answ
135.
by mojzu 6y ago
Although I’m definitely not convinced enough to make the jump yet, those emulation benchmarks are impressive (and seem to also apply somewhat to general use based on another review I read). Running x86 code faster than native equivalents, u
136.
by mojzu 6y ago
I think it’s more targeted specifically at Epic, although maybe they thought it might help more generally with antitrust too. Epic made a big deal in their lawsuit/PR about how apples policies negatively impact smaller developers, and
137.
by mojzu 6y ago
They've definitely earned some credit in my eyes for the async/await syntax. There was quite a bit of pushback for deviating from the norm there, but after using it for a few months other languages async/await just feels clun
138.
by mojzu 6y ago
I'm not entirely convinced by UBI yet either, however I think there are arguments that could made against your headline cost calculation. It could eliminate/save other huge portions of the budget. It would also probably have to be
139.
by mojzu 6y ago
What relevance does a 10 year old article from a US hospital have on this UK news? As long as the opt-out is respected I also don't see what's totalitarian about it.
140.
by mojzu 7y ago
After spending a long time trying to figure this out I came to the opposite conclusion of the article. Unless you're only operating in one/a small number of countries trying to normalise addresses is too much of a moving target. T
141.
by mojzu 7y ago
It has probably been improved since I last tried it but this is one of the reasons I picked Angular over React. Having a router, HTTP client, forms, i18n, etc. out of the box compared to having to find/evaluate/integrate/main
142.
by mojzu 7y ago
That is standard legal boilerplate that allows them to host/display content that you mark as public. All sites that share user generated content publicly have similar clauses.
143.
by mojzu 7y ago
I've been in the process of switching to tonic for the last few of weeks. Based on hyper/tower and has async/await support. It's a gRPC server rather than HTTP, so I've been using it with grpc-gateway to provide an
144.
by mojzu 7y ago
For some reason I thought serde was using macros to perform deserialisation. Now I know that isn't the case and it's a coincidence the default recursion limit and the serde default nesting limit is 128.
145.
by mojzu 7y ago
I think the reason that the nesting level limit is 128 and the file size is 256 bytes for serde_json in this test is that the recursion_limit attribute is not configured. https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes&#