Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
moe
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
1478 ms
·
3721.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
Yeah, and nobody ever reported about that bag of rice that fell over in china yesterday. It's a media conspiracy!
3722.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
If you really think that then you have obviously never tried it. Look here for the real solution, which is slightly more involved: http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/perfect-3-column.htm
3723.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
Sorry but that is an understatement. Creating a three column layout is surprisingly hard and completely counter-intuitive and it gets only harder when you want liquid columns. IE is part of the problem but many of the other browsers also
3724.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
cherrypy and sqlalchemy. and closely looking at werkzeug for future projects.
3725.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
Yeah, same here. During the day I usually only get small things done, if at all. Only after 10pm, sometimes closer to midnight, I really manage to zero in on a task and work it through. Most of the time I'm either done or get tired at aroun
3726.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
I'm with cstejerean on this issue. Remember the premise of the original article was an idealistic one, it basically said: "Which kind of programmer should you hire when you have a choice". Given the goal is to make money I know which kin
3727.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
I think your pizza topping selector example is dead on. Because yes, that's your task as a programmer. You deliver a pizza-topping-selector-configurator that has all the flexibilities built in that the client needs and it will be easier t
3728.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
After a bit more research on the subject I think it's fairly safe to call bullshit on that $200/hour figure. It's either a concerted PR stunt or the app developer is trying to push his market value. While I didn't find much information abou
3729.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
I'm somewhat doubtful about the original claim of making $200 per hour exactly because of the math that you present. Or rather, $200/hour for how long? Even if all 20mio(?) iphone owners downloaded and used the app once that only amounts to
3730.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
Didn't I just explain that in my previous post? Ultimately all programming is about "garbage in / garbage out" or, as you put it, input, validate, store, output. Summing up a specific programming domain like that is a bit like saying "archi
3731.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
Well, unfortunately the population of dog-loving barefeet coders does not entirely overlap with the population of rockstar programmers. But nonetheless our main criterions remain quality of code and ability to communicate in a meaningful wa
3732.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
That's nonsense, web programming is not (at least not in the general case) about forms and reports. If forms and database queries eat up a large portion of your time then I'd suggest to look into proper frameworks. In fact, that's what web
3733.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
Well, that depends on your environment ofcourse, but I'd say when you're spending 90% of your time on forms and reports then you're doing something wrong. A smart programmer would probably find or build a framework that allows the consumers
3734.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
Because you can learn typing without loving it and you can learn mopping without loving it. Not so with programming which is ultimately a creative task. I know plenty of people who went through university and learned the mechanics of progra
3735.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
I think your first point is invalid. Using either kind of table marks up your content with presentation details. There is no difference between <table><tr><td></td></tr></table> and <div&#
3736.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
Being in the process of launching an own company I can wholeheartly second both of your points. During our recruiting efforts we noticed that most people are mindboggingly risk averse, up to the point of irrationality. In one sentence they'
3737.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
What improvement over HTML tables does display:table provide? I see none. It requires the identical nested markup, except that all your tr 's and td 's are called div now. Really, why would anyone even consider using display:table inste
3738.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
We're in the same boat here and found equity share plus an adequate (although not exactly "market level") honorary a good balance. It lowers the barrier of entry for the would-be partner because he'll at least get something out of it imme
3739.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
Very vague article, indeed, looks like they're mainly trying to stir some hype for their book. Praising css tables as "the next big thing" is just backwards. Matt Wilcox has a good article about that misconception: http://mattwilcox.net/ar
3740.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
I think UI patterns are a good thing because there is only a small number of good solutions to any given UI-problem but an infinite number of ways to screw it up. Identifying and explaining a few proven solutions for the most common tasks c
3741.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
infoq is overrated.
3742.
▲
by
moe
18y ago
Idea 3 also sounds like the only one to me that may realistically roll in some money. Idea 1 is technically intriguing but more of an OSS side-project. Idea 2 calls for legal hassles, taxes will eat into your profits and especially the "hig