Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
modo_mario
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
31.
▲
by
modo_mario
26d ago
Not him but. >For example here they discuss economic life vs operational life, when you live in reality rather than grasping for straws: It's essentially just saying the market can't think long term enough leading to drastic di
32.
▲
by
modo_mario
26d ago
That's far more than 4 per year? Their speed when building them has been pretty damn good.
33.
▲
by
modo_mario
26d ago
>because the clampdown on immigration was effective (though they obviously are continuing to shout about immigration and immigrants They still have 2-3 times the amount of migration they did in the 90's and that is assuming they
34.
▲
by
modo_mario
26d ago
>And who buys furniture to pass it on to your kids? Your kids will be unburdening themselves of your old furniture before you are in the ground. My great grandparents and grandparents did and I appreciate it a ton. I think modern consume
35.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
I think less people expected those to cause generational trouble and so a common pro-migration argument 1-2 decades ago was that these people from mena regions would assimilate. After all the people from (in our case italy) mostly already d
36.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
Regarding point 1 I refer to point 3 and regarding point 3 i refer to point 1.
37.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
>Mali would be wealthy empires. Slavery was a foundational economic and social pillar of the mali empire.
38.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
There's a growing amount of visible homlessness near here in Brussels and the other big cities in Belgium and a lot of other western european cities Influences related to migration have overwhelmed whatever support systems there are to
39.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
>Then, when the AMOC stops, and we join Canadian weather West canadian weather which is in itself more moderate. The amoc is not the only moderating effect that makes europes climate possible. It'll still suck tho.
40.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
I am indeed eliding the dynamic of professionalism. I don't think it has to be "ludicrously" labour intensive and I think "professional art" is overvalued and an absolute minority of all art ever created. It just so
41.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
I feel like a good number of people have gotten fatigue from the share of mindspace given to art that is deemed valuable due to some art history, that you maybe even can only get if you have knowledge of art history or read the plague attri
42.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
Maybe it's just semantics but: I wouldn't use the nomer americana which is a grouping of styles itself becoming less comon. Secondly I wouldn't ascribe intentionality to all if it. That's what made it so dangerous a
43.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
>Basically when people stopped only drawing religious art and portraits of nobles. We drew vastly more art. The kind you describe was just more likely to be preserved as the institutions they were on about and the buildings they resided
44.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
I think this worked out quite well when there was a societal expectation of conformity in various ways and so everyone's good actions was either directed to the good of everyone or the good of the tribe depending on the person and thei
45.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
>But before that, why You can ask that question about a lot of things whether it's one entrepeneurial baby or their nature conservation effort which reveals it to be somewhat meaningless question.
46.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
I think being a proper dad (or mom of course) you realise that that is something extremely "significant and meaningful". My ambition is to become a dad. I have other ambitions too whcih require a lot of time but if need be i'
47.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
I think the right thing in this context relates more to every day matters that affects people and how they interact with the world. Corruption, unsafety, tax avoidance, vandalism, not paying the bus/tram ticket, littering. As for el si
48.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
Truly secular states simply don't exist anywhere in the middle east so it seems wild to expect it there of all places and a multicultural population simply means barelling towards a monocultural future for much of the israelis I think.
49.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
The thing is nobody wants to be South Africa. Decline, corruption, sectarian parties and a general bleak long term outlook for the population who gave up control. The jews in this picture would likely see a much bleaker fate due to their cu
50.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
No i mean like. How do you picture the end result?
51.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
How would you envision the end of the state?
52.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
>but France got the UK on their side by appealing to anger over the Lockerbie bombing. I don't believe anyone still gave a shit at that point or expected ghadaffi to redo after he paid for it. I think it might be better to look at t
53.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
Did those predictions involve companies investing in eachother in a circular manner? i only remember similar rethoric in retrospect about repeatedly repackaged and resold debt in retrospectives about 2008 but those weren't wrong.
54.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
We're well into that 30 years. You'd have to start doing so sincerely and i don't see nor expect it.
55.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
In the end you have to replace those panels and nobody in your country now produces them or has the incentive to start producing them unless they not only drop the subsidies but sell well over market value.
56.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
I think a good engineer still reads the majority of what llm's put out for him and understands it so trust doesn't really come into the picture.
57.
▲
by
modo_mario
1mo ago
What is cheap and what is expensive in this context tho? Presumably we don't want to be using blue hydrogen forever but if the alternative is sufficiently harder to get (if i remember well hydrogen isn't exactly winning the energy
58.
▲
by
modo_mario
2mo ago
It's not dumb and promotes what's engaging for users individually algoritmically without categorising. That's the not dumb part about it. >They serve you content that they think you will find engaging, and there has to be
59.
▲
by
modo_mario
2mo ago
>They can, at any moment, de-rank rage-bait, but they don't. That clearly signals "make rage-bait for our platform and we'll pay you." They don't because they don't select for it. They disporotionally push e
60.
▲
by
modo_mario
2mo ago
Oh true and we consequently need to eat less cow meat, more different meat and/or have less people. but focusing on that is shifting blame in an innefectual way of course. Pointing at cow farts puts the pressure on the individual and s
More ›