mnarayan01

14 ms·

91.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
Since you're presumably intending to at least glance at all the output, it's hard to imagine speed being a limiting factor here. Also internal bookkeeping done by the terminal is probably going to limit how much command speed ma
92.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
Bah I can't read...you two are correct.
93.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
You could potentially add something like: HISTIGNORE='dpg *' to e.g. your .bashrc -- not sure if the version of bash on OSX supports HISTIGNORE though (plus many other issues).
94.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
The Accept-Encoding header is used to specify the acceptable transfer encodings. Certainly all browsers set it, and most "advanced" frameworks will at least handle the common values of Transfer-Encoding regardless; a "malicio
95.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
At least according to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/28728#issuecomment-... this is a more general issue with clang/llvm -- even e.g. `while(1);` in C is being optimized out.
96.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
A semi-esoteric bovid does not strike me as easily distinguishable given the style of the illustrations.
97.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
> it simplified the business logic aspect to such a degree that even non-devs were able to be productive with it * bash (or any shell) -- Might seem odd to call it a DSL, but it certainly embodies the abbreviation. * Matlab/R&#x
98.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
No. This is just an ad for why you'd use their service, disguised as a blog post.
99.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
I think the point of this post is: You can use https://cloud.google.com/spanner/ to work with a CP model (typically much less of a headache than AP), while sacrificing so little availability that it's essentially
100.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
> In what way is this not strictly better for the defender than if that same process was running as SYSTEM? You need to make sure there are no holes in the IPC. Like I said, it's presumably not infeasible, but it would have to be do
101.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
Are you asking about Defender itself or the emulation component? I'd think that Defender does need the higher privilege level for obvious reasons, though conceivably the more "risky" emulation could be done in a separate proc
102.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
Yea this seems like the key question. I don't know if Level 5 in two years is feasible, but if it's Level 5 or bust, then LIDAR won't fly (AIUI; would certainly welcome corrections). On one hand, not pulling in potential safe
103.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
Yes. I believe Windows requires you to specify a maximum reserved stack size in the program executable. That's...not going to happen for e.g. Linux.
104.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
No: See http://en.cppreference.com/w/c/string/byte/memset#Notes -- if you don't read from it, the call may be optimized away.
105.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
Yea I'm in the same boat. It's nice, though there are definitely warts. For third-party stuff stubs are a big help. For stuff I'm actively working on I've found comments/docstrings (I've used reStructuredText)
106.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
If you do the work suggested in https://www.jetbrains.com/help/pycharm/type-hinting-in-pycha... which references https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0484/ and https://www
107.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
"Indent with tabs, align with spaces" (e.g. [1]) would be my strong preference in a perfect world. In addition to its "ethereal" benefits, some languages which support HEREDOCs have nice "tab ignoring" versio
108.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
If foo/bar does not exist, it should be silent. Via http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/utilities/rm.... on the -f option: > [...] Do not write diagnostic messages or modify the exit status
109.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
The big upside to Markdown is that unprocessed readability is fully first-class; if something doesn't provide at least some utility when reading the raw document, then it doesn't exist. Of course, that's also one of its downs
110.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
I'm not sure that I've ever seen a CEO get extensively criticized on HN for their pay . I feel like this needs at least a single anecdotal comparison from both the WSJ and HN for the question to get any sort of real answers.
111.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
You got my point in your first comment in this thread. Unless that comment was the result of hours of striving, it doesn't seem as if the point was hidden well . If you did spend hours working at it, then I apologize and commend you o
112.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
// ... Well typed things ... if (arbitrary_well_typed_function()) { v = 0xF00 + "bar" } // ... Well typed things ... Let's say this program is well typed iff `arbitrary_well_typed_functio
113.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
> What is the undecidability result you are referring to? Just the correspondence between static type safety and the halting problem. > I kind of have the feeling you are trying to make a point about formal languages being "the s
114.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
The article could probably do with at least some discussion of https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0484/ . Also: > Our optional type system was designed from the perspective that a single language can consi
115.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
True, though note that the limit is on active requests on the browser end (obviously). If your subrequests are "heavy" and the user refreshes a bunch, you're now going to have 6x (or 8x or whatever the limit is on their bro
116.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
Having 32 bits of 1-second resolution time and 128 bits of random payload makes the idea that these are "semi-sortable" a bit odd. Consider: 1. Let's be super-lenient and say that we'll consider an average size bucket
117.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
It would be interesting to have a language with first-class(ish) support for "tagged" aliases, where an IDE could then expand to short/long versions as configured. To some extent you could already do it in a lot of languages
118.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
Political discussion tends to be of a fundamentally different type vis-à-vis technical discussion. Discussion mechanics like voting and flagging (particularly apropos here) which work well for technical discussions are often...lacking...whe
119.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
That one jumped out at me too. Particularly since, given the multiple spellings, entering "How to spell gray" (cf. just "gray") actually makes sense.
120.
by mnarayan01 9y ago
Possibly related to conversion to/from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECEF which uses ellipsoidal height (Geodetic), potentially in ways which would be problematic for negative values.

More ›