Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mlyle
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
151.
▲
by
mlyle
7mo ago
Spy chips could be just slightly different firmware for... any number of different things. It could be pretty stealthy, too.
152.
▲
by
mlyle
7mo ago
Run continuously, non-delayed, but only sweep the order book at a random time every [1,2) seconds. Run for something like our current extended market hours. Everyone gets the benefit of fast-enough execution and strong liquidity. Crazy hig
153.
▲
by
mlyle
7mo ago
Diversifying away from NASDAQ-tracking index as a component of my investments will be extremely tax costly. Maybe more costly than the gavage (as the NASDAQ/SpaceX folks seem to be betting). And most people won't even be informed
154.
▲
by
mlyle
7mo ago
> high-bandwidth, low-latency mesh network in a contested electronic environment. Hard to win at jamming, when you're further away and the opponents are frequency agile. 1. They can use directionality more effectively to their advan
155.
▲
by
mlyle
7mo ago
I don't think the online advertising field is tilted "wildly in Apple's favor". Yes, Apple squeaked out one area of advantage, eliminating some crushing abuse by others in the process. In a sane world, no one would have
156.
▲
by
mlyle
7mo ago
This isn't about the average voter-- this is about an entrenched industry creating structural barriers to entry to protect growing monopoly power.
157.
▲
by
mlyle
7mo ago
Sometimes something good (ATT). Sometimes something bad (this terrible age-verification thing that is a huge barrier to entry for small entrants and comes with massive state surveillance risk). In the end, all the little people are just co
158.
▲
by
mlyle
7mo ago
> Cost of enforcement matters. The exact same nominal law that is very costly to enforce has completely different costs and benefits then that same law becoming all but free to rigidly enforce. Hey, I really like this framing. This is a
159.
▲
by
mlyle
7mo ago
I really meant to say that there's no way to really know of any region of the CO2 vs. temperature graph if there's positive or negative feedback dominating. You're proposing it all runs away in one lump, and I'm sayin
160.
▲
by
mlyle
7mo ago
> This is an unassailable statement. No. I believe what you're saying is very likely to be true, but we know there's both positive and negative feedback and we don't really know how they really will interplay and where
161.
▲
by
mlyle
7mo ago
The models don't consider these because there's considerable uncertainty as to the size of these effects and potential countervailing forces of similar magnitudes. The fact is, for all of these other secondary effects etc... we ju
162.
▲
by
mlyle
7mo ago
If those customers end up profitable, it could be tempting for nVidia to vertically integrate. I don't think it's as easy as others say, though.
163.
▲
by
mlyle
7mo ago
There's nothing to say that you can't build something intelligent out of them by bolting a memory on it, though. Sure, it's not how we work, but I can imagine a system where the LLM does a lot of heavy lifting and allows more
164.
▲
by
mlyle
8mo ago
> I have built a quick demo This is obvs 5 minutes of LLM generated code > a regulator verifies the cryptographic proof without trusting the operator. No, the regulator verifies that the operator signed the proof, which isn't a l
165.
▲
by
mlyle
8mo ago
Proving policy controls are in place and that actions were taken is a fairly universal problem. Cryptography doesn't really do as much to improve it as one would think. Yes, providing evidence of sequence or that stuff happened before
166.
▲
by
mlyle
8mo ago
There's no mathematically verifiable proof that anyone followed the rules. There's a cryptographic chain, but it just means "this piece of the stack, at some point, was convinced to process this and recorded that it did this
167.
▲
by
mlyle
8mo ago
Why does whether the agent "commits" to a rule cryptographically matter? Surely it's just the enforcement, and maybe the measuring of sentinel events -- how far does it wander off course. How is cryptography an important part
168.
▲
by
mlyle
8mo ago
It looks almost entirely envisioned and implemented by AI. An agent signing a covenant doesn't do anything. You're not going to enforce a contract against it, and there's not some kind of non-repudiation problem to solve. Enf
169.
▲
by
mlyle
8mo ago
I think there's a notable distinction between "domestic mass-surveillance" and use in international intelligence gathering. The poster said: > Both their stances are flawed because their ethics apparently end at the border
170.
▲
by
mlyle
8mo ago
I'm really not sure what you're trying to say or assert, so you can put it more clearly.
171.
▲
by
mlyle
8mo ago
Which thing? Helping intelligence / international surveillance?
172.
▲
by
mlyle
8mo ago
> > Secondarily, we're talking about domestic surveillance / law enforcement. That would be domestic. > One of Anthropic's line in the sand was domestic mass-surveillance. And?
173.
▲
by
mlyle
8mo ago
? we're talking about autonomous weapons systems. That would be internationally. Secondarily, we're talking about domestic surveillance / law enforcement. That would be domestic. (But they do not find an issue with interna
174.
▲
by
mlyle
8mo ago
The market price of the ransom for a King is a King's ransom.
175.
▲
by
mlyle
8mo ago
One reason we end up with excess capacity is process improvements; adding new fabs to get more density or performance doesn't make old fabs go away, and so we go through cycles of excess capacity. Demand has been relatively constant. H
176.
▲
by
mlyle
8mo ago
The problems with any claim of consciousness are that they are unfalsifiable. But it seems to be pretty hard to come up with a coherent claim of meat-consciousness that really excludes the possibility of machine-consciousness without some
177.
▲
by
mlyle
8mo ago
This assumes all the energy is leaked when you open the door, and that the power is constant rather than ramping down. I'm guessing a -lot less- leaks than this. (And, of course, you don't absorb all of what leaks).
178.
▲
by
mlyle
8mo ago
Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46980929 , posted days before your comment. In retrospect, I should have put "just" in quotes. I think that would have made intent more clear.
179.
▲
by
mlyle
8mo ago
I built and debugged an embedded stub loader for Rp2350 to program MRAM and validate hardware status for a satellite. About 2.5 hours of my time, a lot of it while supervising students/doing other things. This would have been a couple
180.
▲
by
mlyle
8mo ago
You can absolutely put NM cable, etc, under a cover. It's just more trouble than it is worth. You still need the required setbacks from the wall, etc, and .. there's reasons why bored holes very low on the wall (like for a baseb
More ›