mlyle

17 ms·

331.
by mlyle 1y ago
> They should, in my view, have had y as a function of t, and dropped x. Then you could have only had a flat floor that moved up and down. If you need shape that changes, you need it to be a function of both x and t. So e.g. (x-t)^2 &#x
332.
by mlyle 1y ago
I agree that testing from a vanilla machine is important. But there's also that your language to the user doesn't necessarily say what you think it does. You can't read it from the position of someone new. Only someone new
333.
by mlyle 1y ago
I don't know how he'd be deciding which oncoming cars are equipped with this feature, as it's still uncommon. And he said " How hard is switching between high and low beams?" which seems to be more talking about au
334.
by mlyle 1y ago
We're not talking about auto high-beams. We're talking about headlights that mask out a portion (of even the normal beam) based on where other cars are.
335.
by mlyle 1y ago
I don't understand your logic, and your statement isn't true. Fraud doesn’t require someone to be "tricked into giving something for nothing." Courts have long recognized that it’s also fraud when one party induces anoth
336.
by mlyle 1y ago
You never get someone to pay a large application fee without some kind of reasonable prospect of getting an exclusive right. Else, if company A pays a $100k fee, company B has an incentive to give the worker $90,000 more to jump ship. And
337.
by mlyle 1y ago
> Normally fraud involves lying to someone to get them to enter into a business relationship with you, not to keep one. There is no distinction of the sort in the law. e.g. California: (3) “Fraud” means an intentional misrepresentation,
338.
by mlyle 1y ago
Well, e.g. I am at a nonprofit using Slack and would rather not get rugpulled in the future. So I'm particularly interested in any evidence that Slack can give that this was an isolated, unintentional circumstance and won't happe
339.
by mlyle 1y ago
I think there's a reasonable question about whether this was really an accident or something deliberate that they walked away from after bad PR. Fixing the immediate problem is only step one. It's reasonable to ask for accountabi
340.
by mlyle 1y ago
Please either support your original point or retract it. Don't try and gallop and change the goalposts. You stated he was convicted for abusing his kids and wife repeatedly. It appears this never happened. Now you have a new set of
341.
by mlyle 1y ago
No one is ever going to pay per-seat for tens of thousands of teenage volunteers. If you're an unusual customer (nonprofit, with lots of volunteers and program people in the slack) you might end up with a long term special deal recogn
342.
by mlyle 1y ago
> Went to jail for abusing his kids and wife > Got out, was arrested for beating his pregnant wife again > Got charged again for beating a kid This, as best as I can tell, is false. There was testimony from his ex-wife about viole
343.
by mlyle 1y ago
Uber and Lyft calculate that their cooperation doesn't affect Waymo's trajectory too much, and they immediately benefit from "more drivers." > Or is the idea that Waymo becomes a hardware provider and uber / lyft
344.
by mlyle 1y ago
Almost certainly Waymo has given Uber some kind of time-limited exclusivity in that market.
345.
by mlyle 1y ago
Yup, marketing. And Waymo can launch at a smaller scale in the market knowing that overflow and rides that Waymo can't do can be done by human drivers. It's a way for Waymo to prepare to turn on the spigot, too, if they dump a bu
346.
by mlyle 1y ago
The funny thing with the community status page is that stations can't report they're down when they're down :P There's big holes in individual stations' history and it looks normal. https://www.reddit.co
347.
by mlyle 1y ago
You spend a third of your life at work. Better for it to be something you can enjoy and be proud of than not. Or, from another lens: My father was an awesome man, and incredible to his family-- and he went on an incredible personal journey
348.
by mlyle 1y ago
> Had a quick look at the patent, had a quick look at the code. To me it appears that 99,999% of all involved research has been taken from prior research from tons of scientists. How'd you arrive at this conclusion? The stuff in th
349.
by mlyle 1y ago
Yup. Obviously you want to fix the bias in the early version of the numbers eventually. But you don't want to change what you're doing all the time, so you stay an easy product for everyone else to use. (Interesting that this &qu
350.
by mlyle 1y ago
There's a little bit of a philosophical thing here -- do you adjust the earlier measurement by some function because it's usually been high and revised downwards? If you do, you need to let every user know that you're doing s
351.
by mlyle 1y ago
Hyundai absolutely does a lot of training of US-based employees in Korea. But sometimes you have a shorter-term need for some setup talent (especially when language skills and understanding local engineering conventions is important). This
352.
by mlyle 1y ago
I think there's still people hacking around doing cool stuff. Things like PICO-8, etc. It's much harder to throw a big party these days in general, and especially so about technical niches. Hack Club is popular with youth, but mu
353.
by mlyle 1y ago
Yah-- there's been no desire to enforce ESTA/B-1 visa restrictions for ordinary abuses, because we don't have a workable short term productive work regime. We don't really have a mechanism where Hyundai can bring over la
354.
by mlyle 1y ago
This is one of those weird edge cases that comes from us having an incoherent immigration policy. We know that fitting out and commissioning these kinds of factories takes foreign workers who have the subject matter expertise on how the par
355.
by mlyle 1y ago
There's no secure enclave output here. Stop the bogus reports. If I want to talk to ChatGPT, I'll go to the site or use the API kthx.
356.
by mlyle 1y ago
Shared resources isn't a "hardware bug." It's a design choice. I2C is always vulnerable to one device locking up the bus-- indeed almost all buses are. But it's intended to be a bus hooking up multiple pieces of
357.
by mlyle 1y ago
I don't believe the APIs are actually under marginal cost. Inference is cheap, but people are using a lot of it. The problem is, the arguments you're making could be used for almost any industry, including ones that we've se
358.
by mlyle 1y ago
Probably not. But we don't tend to see P=MC where there's any differentiation or barrier to entry, and I do not believe that AI is fully commoditized or will be soon.
359.
by mlyle 1y ago
Almost anything has a utility scale which is diminishing. But we still see MR=MC pricing in industries with barriers to entry (IPR, capital costs). TSMC and Mercedes don't price cheap to avoid giving others a toehold. > There is a
360.
by mlyle 1y ago
> So long as there is competition it’ll be available at marginal cost. Most things are not perfect competition, so you get MR=MC not P=MC. We're talking about massive capital costs. Another name for massive capital costs are "

More ›