mlrtime

24 ms·

751.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
Isn't x the same (I don't use it much). Can' you just look at posts from people you want?
752.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
This is not pointing to the Russia government trying to influence the election to gain favoritism. "For the most part, the people who run troll farms have financial rather than political motives; they post whatever receives the most en
753.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
Anything to do with money being made will have manipulation, niche or not.
754.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
Oh yeah, I forgot about that. Anyone remember WinNuke?
755.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
Correct, and taken over reddit which has the same issue as X.
756.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
You could easily builds this, but my guess is people would use it but very sparingly. My small neighborhood has a non-anonymous chat group, which is 2-3 streets (~50 houses) inside a village which is inside a city. It is basically just a mi
757.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_September
758.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
Reddit (at least anything that ever shows up on /r/all) is no different than X/Twitter. Even nice tech subs have the same issues occasionally. X and Reddit are no different.
759.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
Which ones do you use then besides HN obviously? I'm interested to know what you think = anonymous + trust.
760.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
It was a bad example as it's quite easy to detect cloud operator endpoints (their internet gateway). Try it sometime and see how many web site make you go through some captcha maze. They would most likely use residential proxy/vpn
761.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
It seems a little self evident? A heroin addict might say they love it and never want to quit, at the same time say it's harmful, should be banned and nobody should ever try it.
762.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
> Ironically many of the people in favor of banning VPNs are themselves using a VPN. How do you know this as a fact?
763.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
Reddit even more so, thats why you see these 'touch grass' comments littered around.
764.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
This research has nothing to do with wealth inequality or homelessness. It's simply documenting that young children form attachment bonds with consistent caregivers, whether that's mom, dad, grandma, or a stable daycare worker. Th
765.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
Right, and that's exactly the point. It was extended family and close community, not institutional strangers. Grandma watching the kids while mom works the fields is completely different from dropping an infant at a commercial daycare
766.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
What age? 0-18 months, there is no skill other than being the parent(s).
767.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
We're talking about different age ranges here. For 0-3 years, especially infants, the attachment research is very consistent primary caregivers matter enormously for development. A 1yo doesn't need to "expand their social lif
768.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
Hold on - you're conflating "traditional housewife with zero financial independence" with "choosing to be the primary caregiver for your own kids." Those are not the same thing. The fact that your mom and MIL needed
769.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
What do you mean?
770.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
They give up pay for guaranteed work and benefits, maybe a pension? Most likely little risk of being fired or laid off. You have to keep finding clients (I'm sure it's easy now, will it always?) and pay all your expenses.
771.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
>Is there anything that annoys you about your current workplace? Not just compensation, but really anything at all. Yes, of course, I'm human! But the things that mostly annoy me are the other 20 employees, not "the system&quot
772.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
I don't know??? I'm an American SWE, I still haven't seen one good reason why I would want to be in a Union.
773.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
You asked if I heard of [the] hollywood strike, I have. I didn't care because most of what hollywood puts out is not worth consuming. The writers could go on strike for years, so what?
774.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
>Makes no sense. You can build until demand goes down. It makes a lot of sense when you realize who builds and brings capital. Debeers for an extreme example.
775.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
"Drug addicts and mentally ill people can be down-on-their luck. That somebody is mentally ill or have an addiction does not mean that society should discard them." This line of thinking (IMO) is both manipulative and harmful. At
776.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
Good for you for doing better! But people have a mental picture of homeless, and it is people on the streets they see everyday, not families living in a van or someone couch surfing for years.
777.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
What is your point? I mean I get it, people don't like sleeping in the snow, but what are you saying? Where are they going when it snows? You're saying CA cities wouldn't have this problem if it snowed but still gave out bill
778.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
Why is wealth inequality an issue for people who have mental disorders, chronic drug issues or people who just don't want to live by societal standards?
779.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
It's still a poor question IMO. 99% reading this thread is not the problem. They are not taking your hypothetical offer. But there is a small slice of the population that would take your offer. The small percent of people that would ta
780.
by mlrtime 11mo ago
I think the only way is to give up a bit of freedom for the person's best interested AND societies. This never works though because once you decide to do this, it is abused. So to prevent abuse, you use law enforcement. What I mean is

More ›