mlrtime

14 ms·

451.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
>Maybe we shouldn't be turning corns into cows Why? We like beef. I don't want it to go away.
452.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
Because it goes against the urban popular group think. "Blue States subsidizing Red States" "NZ did it, so US can to" Provide any real or partial claims this isn't the whole story and it's difficult to change y
453.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
>What is hurting farmers are reduced markets I know there is a rule about reading the article, but did you? This [trend] is nothing new, USAid has nothing to do with it other than short term changes.
454.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
No, the US will not depend on foreign aid to [primarily] feed it's citizens. Never going to happen.
455.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
The ability for a nation to feed itself is national security, period. Anyone who says otherwise is wishfully thinking or naive. The quickest way for a government to collapse is famine. IMO it is the role of the federal government to ensure
456.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
You are correct, no replies but people don't like your message.
457.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
And every single time there is discussion from liberals talking about rural voters, they have to mention that they know whats best for them, how they vote against their interests. I keep telling them this strategy doesn't work. The smu
458.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
>Most large farm owners are very well off Most family farms (From my area) are land rich. The land is worth a lot, but they never sell it. The farming essentially pays for the land, and maybe a little to live off of. They are NOT raking
459.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
>and I listened to some pro-Trump people who seem otherwise intelligent that tried to explain this effect. If all you know is by listening to people recently on TV then you don't know farmers very well.
460.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
Agreed, and thats why I continue to vote for representatives who won't raise those taxes. The corruption will continue but at least I don't have to continue to feed it.
461.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
I'm rejecting your claim that voters didn't act rationally relative to any other human. No human is 100% rational, doesn't matter if you are Progressive or Conservative, you don't get to claim to be rational and others n
462.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
No, meaning the online world is MUCH different than reality. Reddit is a great example, it's like a different dimension of reality.
463.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
Because actual weapons are much worse, don't you try to exhaust all options until you stop dropping bombs on people?
464.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
After 9/11, America had a brief moment of world support that we royalty screwed up. But that was only because we were attacked. Besides that its all nations for themselves. And even today, if the UK or Germany [just examples] were atta
465.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
Hopefully the Democrats don't double down on it.
466.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
I was thinking the same. It's just a hunch, but very few people vote on what the rest of the world thinks of the candidate that they vote for. They think, how this president will serve me and my family.
467.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
>you wouldn't expect if voters are acting rationally Here we go again. The "You aren't rational" or "You should vote for my cause if you know what is good for you" This does not work, it never will. I don&#x
468.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
>You are delusional if you think January 6th was not an insurrection. Anyone who willingly denies the reality of what happened that day is nothing more than a traitor to this country. Was it a "insurrection", yes, sure. Was it
469.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
The only places I see that Trump 'tried to use a coup to stay in power' is far left commentary and online political discourse. Same exact thing as calling him a pedo. It seems impossible to talk about him without resorting to wild
470.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
It wasn't by mistake, it was there to let replies know I had reflected on it. Humans aren't [100%] rational, never will be. That is why Spock is so popular.
471.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
I remember when /r/technology was more about technology, now it is /r/politics with a microchip hat. I ignored that sub long ago.
472.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
It is 100% compatible when your basis is just finding a local gas station to fill up. 600 days later, you may know where a charging station is, but not any more convenient... yet.
473.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
100% true, and it may not be rational vs statistics. However in your case your control is still > 0. Seasoned drivers have a six sense about the environment. * Everyone over estimates their driving ability vs the average * No matter how
474.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
The boat could do a lot of things, but providing tech for free is not high on the list.
475.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
True, I don't drive or take public transportation for a commute so I wasn't thinking of that scenario. I wasn't thinking of a scenario where I HAD to do it frequently.
476.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
There are top posts daily of either 100% false images or very doctored images to portray a narrative (usually political or social) on reddit. Then the comments are all usually not critical of the image but to portray the people supporting t
477.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
It sounds like to me he [artist] was disappointed that more people were interested in his video editing than his musical efforts.
478.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
The icloud/google ads are worse IMO. They are impossible to remove once you fill up icloud. Try filling your icloud photos to fill up your space, then try to figure out how to download them all and clean your space efficiently, or don&
479.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
I knew this would come up so specifically searched for the comment. And I knew the death rate for cars would be >>>> than trains. HOWEVER, there is something unique scary about a single incident that kills more people that fit i
480.
by mlrtime 9mo ago
I liked the article, anyone with a lot of experience in sysadmin/ops/devops/SRE should feel a connection. "Yes, we should absolutely be treating our product developers like customers, and thinking critically about the in

More ›