Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mlindner
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
28 ms
·
511.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
They're not $500k. And currently it's $4M missiles shooting down $10k ones, and you need to often shoot several of them to ensure that you down the target.
512.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
The "Italian" company is a former American company that was bought up by the Italian company, the same is true of the "Australian" company.
513.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
Yep exactly. The companies building the ships are often US companies that were bought and then build the ships in the US.
514.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
The "terms" of the enemy are an abrogation of sovereignty to Russia to create its "russian world". Russia wants to have its own dedicated sphere of influence and feels that the world owes that to it. You don't placa
515.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
What does Lancet have to do with this?
516.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
The US DoD is not buying any naval ships from Italy. In fact I'm not aware of a single ship in the US Navy that was built outside of the United States.
517.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
It's some kind of rendering issue difference between Firefox and Safari/Chrome. Safari/Chrome don't have the extra newline there.
518.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
> I can see them capturing US DOD budgets, but predict that much more cost effective competitors emerge internationally. The selling point of Anduril according to one of its founders has always been "Make billions of dollars while s
519.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
After he got fired by Zuckerberg you mean, after the media lied about and dragged his name through the mud. He's recently called that company his "life's work" https://twitter.com/PalmerLuckey/status
520.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
Personally, as someone who likes Anduril and isn't much a fan of Palantir, I never had issue with the people. I had issue with what they were doing. If Anduril was selling primarily to law enforcement/border control/spying li
521.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
> China dominates anduril by a landslide I mean, obviously. Anduril is one company, and still a relatively small company at that. > And if you want quality, anduril is not at the forefront of this at all. The US, as you mention, alrea
522.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
This is about the new release of Anduril's new Roadrunner drone that has multiple uses. Bloomberg article: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-12-01/anduril-r... Video of a demonstration strike
523.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
Odd the repository has "safety" in the name. Are NSFW images considered "unsafe" in some weird way?
524.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
If the future we're talking about is a future where AI is in any software and is assisting writers writing and assisting editors to edit and doing proofreading and everything else you're absolutely going to be running into the eth
525.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
It's already available in Germany.
526.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
> How can it be a good idea to have such an important company to national security public? They've made themselves important by working very hard... It's interesting how the narrative switches immediately from mocking someone
527.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
A lot of retirement funds invest in private companies.
528.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
> without ever deviating into under age material So is this a "there should never be a Vladimir Nabokov in the form of AI allowed to exist"? When people get into saying AI's shouldn't be allowed to produce "X&quo
529.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
Well that's disappointing. They might as well disband the entire concept of the non-profit as it's clearly completely irrelevant and powerless.
530.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
> Clearly, they don't in this case. Or the controls are for another case. I mean the lawsuit (and preceding tweets by Yaccarino) allege that they do indeed work and Media Matters effectively committed a denial of service attack of s
531.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
Corrected title: X sues Media Matters to silence alleged fraudulent manipulation and libel It's not just X suing, it's also the Texas AG opening an investigation.
532.
▲
Sorry doubters, Starship had a remarkably successful flight
(arstechnica.com)
60 points
by
mlindner
3y ago
|
55 comments
533.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
I'm always logged on and using adblockers. So no, that's not it. I also use Youtube probably every day and am a very active user.
534.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
Using firefox 118 on Mac here and seeing no issues. Videos load instantly or near instantly.
535.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
I still use adblockers perfectly fine on Youtube. There was never a real interruption in adblocking either. You just need ublock origin + bypass paywalls.
536.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
I like your extremist example, however I fear what "properly aligned" means for more vague situations, where it is not at all clear what the "correct" path is, or worse, that it's very clear what "correct"
537.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
What does "properly aligned" even mean? Democracies even with countries don't have alignment, let alone democracies across the world. They're a complete mess of many conflicting and contradictory stances and opinions. Th
538.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
I'm really happy about this. Hopefully this sets OpenAI back on a course toward positive and open uses for AI. Maybe even properly open sourcing things again.
539.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
I don't understand what point you're trying to make. Yes Microsoft uses OpenAI APIs. What is the point you're trying to make beyond that? It's still OpenAI software.
540.
▲
by
mlindner
3y ago
I personally really hope Altman doesn't return if he's really the one who pushed OpenAI away from its non-profit roots.
More ›