Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mkoubaa
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
181.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
Monkey patching python modules is waaaaay more straightforward than this. setattr(mod, name, new_func)
182.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
They're nationalizing it
183.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
What a stupid reason to cut off your child - so late in life too.
184.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
It's a shame both sides can't lose
185.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
I don't see why a trade group of affected industries can't collectively fund this
186.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
HyPeRbOlIc SiNgUlArItY
187.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
And then, 'for sandboxing and security reasons', this will become mandatory
188.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
Library development and application development are activities of a different kind entirely.
189.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
In the end, the mainframe wins
190.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
Buddhist?
191.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
Technically it is an experience that is internal to the nervous system... but a doctor telling someone that it's imagined because they can't identify the root cause is criminal!! If we have to make something up about it we're
192.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
Your phone has a "do not disturb" feature
193.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
Are you allowed to code while sitting in the cockpit but not actively flying?
194.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
Nobody talks the way that text was written anymore. This is a test of a different skill than ability to grok a bit of narrative.
195.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
I think you're confusing critical and analytical reading with narrative reading. It is definitely true that critical reading ability is uncommon but that doesn't mean a typical reader can't follow a story. Sidenote - Dickens
196.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
In some ways we are 30-50% literate now which means I completely agree with you. I only meant the above about the literate 18 year old. If a 17 year old kid with a 3.2 GPA can't follow the prose without a headache then it isn't th
197.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
To produce a good work of fiction its important to both 1) have a story to tell and 2) tell it masterfully. By the time people collect enough life experience to satisfy (1) they've aged out of the demographic that's willing to put
198.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
Even the most challenging work of fiction wasn't challenging to an 18 year old contemporary reader of average intelligence. The fact that in order to appreciate these works in present day requires more intellectualism doesn't act
199.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
No need to apologize, I am unashamedly an opponent of rationalism and I hold the entire movement and every one like it in history in withering contempt.
200.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
The problem with rationalism is we don't have language to express our thoughts formally enough nor a compiler to transform that language into something runnable (platonic AST) nor a machine capable of emulating reality. Expecting ratio
201.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
Not wrong, but Meta in particular is uniquely compliant to the wishes of state actors.
202.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
Right, but the individual in question could rightly find the causal change in their own behavior.
203.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
It's not that wild to notice the connection between drug use and domestic abuse.
204.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
If I was a prisoner one day I think I'd rather spend my days in slave labor than weird ethno-status games.
205.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
Unless the author was raised by chimps I'm out
206.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
When translating from French to English, find someone that speaks both fluently and had domain expertise over the content being translated. Don't find a linguist who understands grammatical structure and claims to be able to map the so
207.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
A unique identifier for a movie is the same thing, like an ISBN number. What the label means in each area is going to be different. That said, some things like "director", "budget" are immutable properties of a movie but
208.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
Wittgenstein sends his regards
209.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
Love it
210.
▲
by
mkoubaa
1y ago
You don't believe in science, you believe in a metaphysical claim about science that you haven't articulated.
More ›