Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mk89
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
48 ms
·
661.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
in my team we don't micromanage, however I agree that some scrum events can be adjusted a bit. For example the sprint reviews don't make much sense if you can deliver any time you want, and we do. It's probably just a way to
662.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
We do it at my company/in my team. It's OK, come on, it's not that bad. It's also a way for our team to get together and talk BS, have a little bit of fun etc.
663.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
Interesting, I had a very similar experience in the past. I think we just were part of a software factory that is not necessarily bad, it's just a different approach to work. It's much more convenient for a manager to just apply &
664.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
The 3 times rule is good, I also apply it quite often, although it's not always an easy sell.
665.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
That's a really interesting product/website. I just looked at: https://lowimpact.organicbasics.com/eur/collections/all-mens... You have to click on the images to actually see the real clothes you'd
666.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
I think I misread your comment :) I think that another way to prevent it is by asking yourself if the other person will find it funny. That's a general advice not just specific to firing/leaving a company.
667.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
How is it funny that your manager tells you as a joke that he is gonna fire you? The truth it: neither of them is a joke. It's just pure BS that comes either out of sheer and innocent incompetence or stupidity.
668.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
> Qt is probably fine but their licensing turns me off from ever using or considering it. If I may ask why? They provide GPL and LGPL, and this last one is quite permissive. See: https://www.qt.io/licensing/open-sour
669.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
> I see no need to play with VPNs for Netflix. I am surprised, because there is some content on Netflix region-specific which you can't access from another country.
670.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
ops, my bad. that's exactly what I meant. Thanks for the correction
671.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
I recommend "learning microservices 2nd edition". The first edition is good, the second gives more practical advice.
672.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
I am not the author of the original message, however, I also recommend "Building microservices 2nd edition" if you are trying to answer such questions
673.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
I agree, it's just that you're not the average user. I am also surprised to see the spam folder surprisingly empty all the time, almost as if my email addresses were unknown to the world (which I am pretty sure they are not). The
674.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
Probably it's more convenient for them to trust X big players rather than checking one by one. And somehow an empty spam folder looks better than a full one, as it gives the user the feeling that the service itself doesn't receive
675.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
What a lame excuse to buy yourself a Mac. Totally recommended :)
676.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
ahhahah This is awesome.
677.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
I agree with this comment. Sleep is ridiculously underestimated in our society due to the fact that it's perceived as a waste of time, while you could do something else more "productive" or "fun" - binge watching, l
678.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
Like it was always done before DNA testing, I guess...
679.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
I just saw the product. My reaction was "it's freaking brilliant". Great work, guys!
680.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
I disagree. There are more and more services providing logistics, delivery, payments, etc. And they are quite reliable. Just 2 years ago I was entirely relying on Amazon as a good ecommerce. As of 2020/2021, to be honest, there is near
681.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
Well, it's something that is slowly backfiring. It's under the eyes of everyone, and not enforcing such policy will only make it even worse for Amazon itself that eventually will end up selling only non-branded products. Finally i
682.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
Because we know how something can be abused until there is another way to abuse it. It's an endless way to abuse it, where a PM with an even more cynical goal will introduce an even more disgusting way to monetize a product. Finally, i
683.
▲
by
mk89
5y ago
Imagine the fun when you give gas and the display shows that your subscription can only reach 100km/h, if you want to go faster, please subscribe to the PRO subscription :) This is/was inevitable. I really think that we will be ab
684.
▲
by
mk89
6y ago
I am not sure if these are the only options we have here. Did you see the list of commits that this bunch of guys sneaked in? It's quite big, it's not just 1-2. A smart attacker could have done 1 commit per month and would have be
685.
▲
by
mk89
6y ago
Sorry I think I didn't understand/read correctly what it was about. It's just f** brilliant! :)
686.
▲
by
mk89
6y ago
This is for me unrelated and even a little bit minimizing the issue here. The purpose of the research was probably to show how easy it is to manipulate the Linux kernel in bad faith. And they did it. What are they gonna do about it beside
687.
▲
by
mk89
6y ago
So you are just fine knowing that any random guy can sneak any code in the Linux kernel? Honestly, I was personally expecting a higher level of review and attention to such things, considering how used the product is. I don't want to l
688.
▲
by
mk89
6y ago
Bug bounties are a different beast. Here we are talking about a bunch of guys who deliberately put stuff into your next kernel release because they come from an important university, or whatever other reason. One of the reviewers in the thr
689.
▲
by
mk89
6y ago
I have the same questions. So far we have focused on how bad these "guys" are. Sure, they could have done it differently, etc. However, they proved a big point: how "easy" it is to manipulate the most used piece of softw
690.
▲
by
mk89
6y ago
You can achieve that with a tool like Kustomize maybe. Or docker-compose.
More ›