mjolk

145 ms·

601.
by mjolk 14y ago
>You really come off as an amoral jerk here. I'm okay with this. I'd rather be calculating than have my head in the sand about the business models of social networking what-have-you applications. >What if a casual hookup site texts
602.
by mjolk 14y ago
Yeah, that negative publicity around Foxconn's workplace conditions really tanked Apple.
603.
by mjolk 14y ago
>Maybe it's time to create a Hippocratic Oath for developers to publicly commit to? This is silly. Stop trying to add grandeur to writing some code at X,Y startup/company. People don't die or get harmed when some social-messaging applic
604.
by mjolk 14y ago
You read it when it came out, but keep in mind that not everyone is exposed to the same content, due to any number of reasons. The site is designed to allow its users to control the visibility of posts - if its interesting to others and yo
605.
by mjolk 14y ago
What's your point, that people should not read content that's over a month old?
606.
by mjolk 14y ago
Likewise. The bulk of America's workforce spends a majority of their waking hours on "what they do," so it's a perfectly valid introductory topic that expresses interest in communication.
607.
by mjolk 14y ago
Don't confuse a reduced number of jobs that can be replaced by machines or algorithms with total capacity or demand for human labor.
608.
by mjolk 14y ago
In the past, I've done an invite-only beta to limit the exposure of issues with my code while in a QA-phase (minimize embarrassment) and to retain control over the load/expense of hosting. I suppose that others could be going with the "kee